Feasibility of mitigation measures for agricultural greenhouse gas emissions in the UK. A systematic review

被引:5
作者
Jebari, Asma [1 ]
Pereyra-Goday, Fabiana [2 ]
Kumar, Atul [1 ]
Collins, Adrian L. [1 ]
Rivero, M. Jordana [1 ]
McAuliffe, Graham A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Rothamsted Res, Net Zero & Resilient Farming, Okehampton EX20 2SB, Devon, England
[2] INIA, Ruta 8 Km 281, Montevideo 33000, Uruguay
基金
英国生物技术与生命科学研究理事会;
关键词
Net zero; Carbon footprint; Farming interventions; Arable farming; Livestock systems; Mixed farming; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; NITROUS-OXIDE EMISSIONS; METHANE EMISSIONS; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS; ANAEROBIC-DIGESTION; CLIMATE MITIGATION; MANURE MANAGEMENT; LIVESTOCK SYSTEMS; BIOENERGY CROPS; MILK-PRODUCTION;
D O I
10.1007/s13593-023-00938-0
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
The UK Government has set an ambitious target of achieving a national "net-zero" greenhouse gas economy by 2050. Agriculture is arguably placed at the heart of achieving net zero, as it plays a unique role as both a producer of GHG emissions and a sector that has the capacity via land use to capture carbon (C) when managed appropriately, thus reducing the concentration of carbon dioxide (CO2) in the atmosphere. Agriculture's importance, particularly in a UK-specific perspective, which is also applicable to many other temperate climate nations globally, is that the majority of land use nationwide is allocated to farming. Here, we present a systematic review based on peer-reviewed literature and relevant "grey" reports to address the question "how can the agricultural sector in the UK reduce, or offset, its direct agricultural emissions at the farm level?" We considered the implications of mitigation measures in terms of food security and import reliance, energy, environmental degradation, and value for money. We identified 52 relevant studies covering major foods produced and consumed in the UK. Our findings indicate that many mitigation measures can indeed contribute to net zero through GHG emissions reduction, offsetting, and bioenergy production, pending their uptake by farmers. While the environmental impacts of mitigation measures were covered well within the reviewed literature, corresponding implications regarding energy, food security, and farmer attitudes towards adoption received scant attention. We also provide an open-access, informative, and comprehensive dataset for agri-environment stakeholders and policymakers to identify the most promising mitigation measures. This research is of critical value to researchers, land managers, and policymakers as an interim guideline resource while more quantitative evidence becomes available through the ongoing lab-, field-, and farm-scale trials which will improve the reliability of agricultural sustainability modelling in the future.
引用
收藏
页数:21
相关论文
共 157 条
[1]   The economics of alternative crop production systems in the context of farmer participation in carbon trading markets [J].
Abdul-Salam, Yakubu ;
Hawes, Cathy ;
Roberts, Deborah ;
Young, Mark .
AGROECOLOGY AND SUSTAINABLE FOOD SYSTEMS, 2019, 43 (01) :67-91
[2]  
ADAS, 2019, Mitigation against GHG emissions: agricultural practices review
[3]  
Al Dulayymi J R, 2017, New bis esters of ivy sapogenins for ruminants
[4]   Carbon implications of converting cropland to bioenergy crops or forest for climate mitigation: a global assessment [J].
Albanito, Fabrizio ;
Beringer, Tim ;
Corstanje, Ronald ;
Poulter, Benjamin ;
Stephenson, Anna ;
Zawadzka, Joanna ;
Smith, Pete .
GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY BIOENERGY, 2016, 8 (01) :81-95
[5]  
Alskaf K, 2018, Conservation agriculture for sustainable land use: the agronomic and environmental impacts of different tillage practices and plant residue retention: farmer uptake of reduced tillage in England
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2006, ISO 14040 2006 ENV M
[7]   Full adoption of the most effective strategies to mitigate methane emissions by ruminants can help meet the 1.5°C target by 2030 but not 2050 [J].
Arndt, Claudia ;
Hristov, Alexander N. ;
Price, William J. ;
McClelland, Shelby C. ;
Pelaez, Amalia M. ;
Cueva, Sergio F. ;
Oh, Joonpyo ;
Dijkstra, Jan ;
Bannink, Andre ;
Bayat, Ali R. ;
Crompton, Les A. ;
Eugene, Maguy A. ;
Enahoro, Dolapo ;
Kebreab, Ermias ;
Kreuzer, Michael ;
McGee, Mark ;
Martin, Cecile ;
Newbold, Charles J. ;
Reynolds, Christopher K. ;
Schwarm, Angela ;
Shingfield, Kevin J. ;
Veneman, Jolien B. ;
Yanez-Ruiz, David R. ;
Yu, Zhongtang .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2022, 119 (20)
[8]   Changes in soil C and N stocks and C:N stoichiometry 21 years after land use change on an arable mineral topsoil [J].
Baddeley, J. A. ;
Edwards, A. C. ;
Watson, C. A. .
GEODERMA, 2017, 303 :19-26
[9]   Interactions between climate warming and land management regulate greenhouse gas fluxes in a temperate grassland ecosystem [J].
Barneze, Arlete S. ;
Whitaker, Jeanette ;
McNamara, Niall P. ;
Ostle, Nicholas J. .
SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2022, 833
[10]   Mitigating the environmental impacts of milk production via anaerobic digestion of manure: Case study of a dairy farm in the Po Valley [J].
Battini, F. ;
Agostini, A. ;
Boulamanti, A. K. ;
Giuntoli, J. ;
Amaducci, S. .
SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2014, 481 :196-208