A scoping review of the self-reported compassion measurement tools

被引:5
|
作者
Jiang, Hu [1 ,2 ]
Wang, Wenna [1 ]
Mei, Yongxia [1 ]
Zhao, Zhixin [1 ]
Lin, Beilei [1 ]
Zhang, Zhenxiang [1 ]
机构
[1] Zhengzhou Univ, Sch Nursing & Hlth, Zhengzhou, Henan, Peoples R China
[2] Zunyi Med Univ, Peoples Hosp Zunyi 1, Affiliated Hosp 3, Nursing Dept, Zunyi, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Compassion; Self-compassion; Compassion to others; Compassion from others; Scale; Scoping review; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; HEALTH-CARE; SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS; VALIDATION; SCALE; DEPRESSION; CHECKLIST; ANXIETY; OTHERS; LOVE;
D O I
10.1186/s12889-023-17178-2
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
BackgroundCompassion is closely linked to psychological well-being, and several assessment tools have been developed and studied to assess the level of compassion in different populations and for more precise measurement. There is currently a scarcity of comprehensive knowledge about compassion-related assessment tools, and our research provides an overview of these tools.AimsTo identify scales used to measure compassion from different flows, and to assess their measurement properties and quality.MethodsFocusing on compassion assessment tools, the authors conducted a thorough search of 10 Chinese and English databases from their establishment until August 14, 2022. Data extracted included the author, year, country, objectives, target population, as well as the primary evaluation content. Using the COSMIN checklist, the methodological quality and measurement properties of the included studies were appraised. This scoping review was registered with the Open Science Framework and followed the PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews) checklist.ResultsThere were 15,965 papers searched, and 36 compassion-related measurement tools were identified in this study. None of the 36 studies provided possessed all nine psychometric properties, as outlined by the COSMIN criteria. On the basis of a systematic evaluation of quality, measurement qualities were ranked. The results for internal consistency and content validity were relatively favorable, whereas the results for structural validity were variable and the results for the remaining attributes were either uncertain or negative. A Venn diagram was used to illustrate the overlapping groups of compassion measurement tools based on the three-way flow of compassion. An overview of the reference instrument and theoretical basis for the included studies was provided, and half of them did not contain any theoretical or scale-based evidence.ConclusionIn this study, 36 compassion-related measuring instruments were identified, and the methodological quality and measurement properties of the included studies were acceptable. The included measurements were consistent with flows of compassion. A further focus of further research should be on developing theories in the compassion domain and developing instruments for measuring compassion that are multidimensional, multi-populations, and culturally relevant.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Self-compassion and related factors in severe mental illness: A scoping review
    Kurebayashi, Yusuke
    Sugimoto, Hiroshi
    PERSPECTIVES IN PSYCHIATRIC CARE, 2022, 58 (04) : 3044 - 3061
  • [42] Changes in self-reported cannabis use during the COVID-19 pandemic: a scoping review
    Kamna Mehra
    Jennifer Rup
    Jessica L. Wiese
    Tara Marie Watson
    Sarah Bonato
    Sergio Rueda
    BMC Public Health, 23
  • [43] Changes in self-reported cannabis use during the COVID-19 pandemic: a scoping review
    Mehra, Kamna
    Rup, Jennifer
    Wiese, Jessica L.
    Watson, Tara Marie
    Bonato, Sarah
    Rueda, Sergio
    BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, 2023, 23 (01)
  • [44] Use of the measurement tools of TeamSTEPPS®: a scoping review
    Dener, Humeyra
    Elcin, Melih
    BMC MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2025, 25 (01)
  • [45] Assessing Self-reported Medication Adherence in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Comparison of Tools
    Severs, Mirjam
    Zuithoff, Peter N. P. A.
    Mangen, Marie-Josee J.
    van der Valk, Mirthe E.
    Siersema, Peter D.
    Fidder, Herma H.
    Oldenburg, Bas
    INFLAMMATORY BOWEL DISEASES, 2016, 22 (09) : 2158 - 2164
  • [46] Screening tools for common mental disorders in older adults in South Asia: a systematic scoping review
    Fotheringham, Lachlan
    Paddick, Stella-Maria
    Millar, Evelyn Barron
    Norman, Claire
    Lukose, Ammu
    Walker, Richard
    Varghese, Mathew
    INTERNATIONAL PSYCHOGERIATRICS, 2022, 34 (05) : 427 - 438
  • [47] Psychometric properties of self-reported financial toxicity measures in cancer survivors: a systematic review
    Zhu, Zheng
    Xing, Weijie
    Wen, Huan
    Sun, Yanling
    So, Winnie K. W.
    Lizarondo, Lucylynn
    Peng, Jian
    Hu, Yan
    BMJ OPEN, 2022, 12 (06):
  • [48] Self-Reported Health Outcomes of Children and Youth with 10 Chronic Diseases
    Forrest, Christopher B.
    Schuchard, Julia
    Bruno, Cortney
    Amaral, Sandra
    Cox, Elizabeth D.
    Flynn, Kathryn E.
    Hinds, Pamela S.
    Huang, I-Chan
    Kappelman, Michael D.
    Krishnan, Jerry A.
    Kumar, Rajesh B.
    Lai, Jin-Shei
    Paller, Amy S.
    Phipatanakul, Wanda
    Schanberg, Laura E.
    Sumino, Kaharu
    Weitzman, Elissa R.
    Reeve, Bryce B.
    JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS, 2022, 246 : 207 - +
  • [49] Suitability of measures of self-reported medication adherence for routine clinical use: A systematic review
    Garfield, Sara
    Clifford, Sarah
    Eliasson, Lina
    Barber, Nick
    Willson, Alan
    BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 2011, 11
  • [50] Current Conceptualization and Operationalization of Adolescents' Social Capital: A Systematic Review of Self-Reported Instruments
    Ahlborg, Mikael G.
    Nyholm, Maria
    Nygren, Jens M.
    Svedberg, Petra
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 19 (23)