A scoping review of the self-reported compassion measurement tools

被引:5
|
作者
Jiang, Hu [1 ,2 ]
Wang, Wenna [1 ]
Mei, Yongxia [1 ]
Zhao, Zhixin [1 ]
Lin, Beilei [1 ]
Zhang, Zhenxiang [1 ]
机构
[1] Zhengzhou Univ, Sch Nursing & Hlth, Zhengzhou, Henan, Peoples R China
[2] Zunyi Med Univ, Peoples Hosp Zunyi 1, Affiliated Hosp 3, Nursing Dept, Zunyi, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Compassion; Self-compassion; Compassion to others; Compassion from others; Scale; Scoping review; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; HEALTH-CARE; SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS; VALIDATION; SCALE; DEPRESSION; CHECKLIST; ANXIETY; OTHERS; LOVE;
D O I
10.1186/s12889-023-17178-2
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
BackgroundCompassion is closely linked to psychological well-being, and several assessment tools have been developed and studied to assess the level of compassion in different populations and for more precise measurement. There is currently a scarcity of comprehensive knowledge about compassion-related assessment tools, and our research provides an overview of these tools.AimsTo identify scales used to measure compassion from different flows, and to assess their measurement properties and quality.MethodsFocusing on compassion assessment tools, the authors conducted a thorough search of 10 Chinese and English databases from their establishment until August 14, 2022. Data extracted included the author, year, country, objectives, target population, as well as the primary evaluation content. Using the COSMIN checklist, the methodological quality and measurement properties of the included studies were appraised. This scoping review was registered with the Open Science Framework and followed the PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews) checklist.ResultsThere were 15,965 papers searched, and 36 compassion-related measurement tools were identified in this study. None of the 36 studies provided possessed all nine psychometric properties, as outlined by the COSMIN criteria. On the basis of a systematic evaluation of quality, measurement qualities were ranked. The results for internal consistency and content validity were relatively favorable, whereas the results for structural validity were variable and the results for the remaining attributes were either uncertain or negative. A Venn diagram was used to illustrate the overlapping groups of compassion measurement tools based on the three-way flow of compassion. An overview of the reference instrument and theoretical basis for the included studies was provided, and half of them did not contain any theoretical or scale-based evidence.ConclusionIn this study, 36 compassion-related measuring instruments were identified, and the methodological quality and measurement properties of the included studies were acceptable. The included measurements were consistent with flows of compassion. A further focus of further research should be on developing theories in the compassion domain and developing instruments for measuring compassion that are multidimensional, multi-populations, and culturally relevant.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] MEASUREMENT AND MISMEASUREMENT OF THE VALIDITY OF THE SELF-REPORTED VOTE
    ANDERSON, BA
    SILVER, BD
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE, 1986, 30 (04) : 771 - 785
  • [32] Systematic review of measurement properties of self-reported instruments for evaluating therapeutic communication
    Granados-Gamez, Genoveva
    Saez-Ruiz, Isabel Maria
    Marquez-Hernandez, Veronica V.
    Ybarra-Sagarduy, Jose Luis
    Aguilera-Manrique, Gabriel
    Gutierrez-Puertas, Lorena
    WESTERN JOURNAL OF NURSING RESEARCH, 2021, 43 (08) : 791 - 804
  • [33] Self-reported blood pressure measurement is reliable
    Nordmann, AJ
    Frach, B
    Walker, T
    Martina, B
    Battegay, E
    JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 1998, 16 : S271 - S271
  • [34] INVENTORY FOR MEASUREMENT OF SELF-REPORTED STRESS AND AROUSAL
    MACKAY, C
    COX, T
    BURROWS, G
    LAZZERINI, T
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SOCIAL AND CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1978, 17 (SEP): : 283 - 284
  • [35] MEASUREMENT ERROR IN SELF-REPORTED HEALTH VARIABLES
    BUTLER, JS
    BURKHAUSER, RV
    MITCHELL, JM
    PINCUS, TP
    REVIEW OF ECONOMICS AND STATISTICS, 1987, 69 (04) : 644 - 650
  • [36] Improving the measurement of self-reported medication nonadherence
    Voils, Corrine I.
    Hoyle, Rick H.
    Thorpe, Carolyn T.
    Maciejewski, Matthew L.
    Yancy, William S., Jr.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2011, 64 (03) : 250 - 254
  • [37] Use of the measurement tools of TeamSTEPPS®: a scoping review
    Dener, Humeyra
    Elcin, Melih
    BMC MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2025, 25 (01)
  • [38] Systematic review of measurement properties of self-reported instruments for evaluating self-care in adults
    Matarese, Maria
    Lommi, Marzia
    De Marinis, Maria Grazia
    JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 2017, 73 (06) : 1272 - 1287
  • [39] Self-Compassion Intervention Programs for Nurses: A Scoping Review
    Bian, Jing
    Chen, Fazhan
    Fang, Shihan
    Wang, Yanbo
    HEALTHCARE, 2025, 13 (02)
  • [40] Training Self-compassion: Exploring the Effects on Adolescents' Physiological and Self-reported Stress Responses
    Volkaert, Brenda
    Verbeken, Sandra
    Debeuf, Taaike
    Michels, Nathalie
    Braet, Caroline
    MINDFULNESS, 2022, 13 (04) : 897 - 907