Evaluating Environmental Impact of Natural and Synthetic Fibers: A Life Cycle Assessment Approach

被引:42
作者
Gonzalez, Victoria [1 ]
Lou, Xingqiu [1 ]
Chi, Ting [1 ]
机构
[1] Washington State Univ, Dept Apparel Merchandising Design & Text, Pullman, WA 99164 USA
关键词
life cycle assessments; natural fibers; synthetic fibers; textiles; environmental impact; sustainable fashion; COTTON; INDUSTRY; HEMP; LCA;
D O I
10.3390/su15097670
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This research aims to analyze the environmental impact of six fibers in the textile industry: conventional and organic cotton, silk, jute, flax, and polyester. The study used a life cycle assessment (LCA) methodology with a cradle-to-gate system boundary and analyzed the stages of agriculture, spinning, weaving, and dyeing. In agriculture production, five impact categories (i.e., fossil resource scarcity, global warming, land use, terrestrial ecotoxicity, and water consumption) have the most significant differences across these fibers. Polyester production significantly impacted the terrestrial ecotoxicity impact category, while stratospheric ozone depletion had a minor impact. In yarn preparation and spinning, silk has the most significant impact in most categories, followed by conventional cotton, while jute had the most minimal impact. In weaving, the most visible differences were in fossil resource scarcity, global warming, land use, terrestrial ecotoxicity, and water consumption. Conventional cotton dyeing showed significant impacts on global warming potential and terrestrial ecotoxicity. This study contributes to the limited literature on existing LCA research in the textile industry. Adding updated information will help increase the comprehension of LCA research and guide stakeholders in transitioning fashion supply chains more sustainably.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 81 条
[1]   Hemp as a potential raw material toward a sustainable world: A review [J].
Ahmed, A. T. M. Faiz ;
Islam, Md Zahidul ;
Mahmud, Md Sultan ;
Sarker, Md Emdad ;
Islam, Md Reajul .
HELIYON, 2022, 8 (01)
[2]   Ecodesign of automotive components making use of natural jute fiber composites [J].
Alves, C. ;
Ferrao, P. M. C. ;
Silva, A. J. ;
Reis, L. G. ;
Freitas, M. ;
Rodrigues, L. B. ;
Alves, D. E. .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2010, 18 (04) :313-327
[3]   Life cycle assessment of Indian silk [J].
Astudillo, Miguel F. ;
Thalwitz, Gunnar ;
Vollrath, Fritz .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2014, 81 :158-167
[4]   Life cycle assessment of organic and conventional non-Bt cotton products from Mali [J].
Avadi, Angel ;
Marcin, Maeva ;
Biard, Yannick ;
Renou, Alain ;
Gourlot, Jean-Paul ;
Basset-Mens, Claudine .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2020, 25 (04) :678-697
[5]  
Bain Marc., 2015, QUARTZ
[6]   Life Cycle Impact Assessment Workshop Summary Midpoints versus Endpoints: The Sacrifices and Benefits [J].
Bare, Jane C. ;
Hofstetter, Patrick ;
Pennington, David W. ;
de Haes, Helias A. Udo .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2000, 5 (06) :319-326
[7]   Effect of bio-friendly conditioning agents on jute fibre spinning [J].
Basu, G. ;
De, S. S. ;
Samanta, A. K. .
INDUSTRIAL CROPS AND PRODUCTS, 2009, 29 (2-3) :281-288
[8]   Life cycle assessment of cotton textile products in Turkey [J].
Baydar, G. ;
Ciliz, N. ;
Mammadov, A. .
RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 2015, 104 :213-223
[9]   Environmental analysis of a cotton yarn supply chain [J].
Bevilacqua, Maurizio ;
Ciarapica, Filippo Emanuele ;
Mazzuto, Giovanni ;
Paciarotti, Claudia .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2014, 82 :154-165
[10]  
Bhalla K., 2020, GREEN BUILDINGS SUST, DOI [10.1007/978-981-15-1063-2_22, DOI 10.1007/978-981-15-1063-2_22]