Subject-specific interests and subject-specific self-concepts

被引:2
作者
Feng, Xiaoli [1 ]
Wang, Jin-Liang [3 ]
Rost, Detlef H. [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Southwest Univ Chongqing, Coll Int Studies, Res Ctr Modern Linguist & Foreign Language Educ, Chongqing, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Marburg, Fac Psychol Philipps, Marburg, Germany
[3] Southwest Univ, Fac Psychol, Ctr Mental Hlth Educ, Chongqing, Peoples R China
来源
ZEITSCHRIFT FUR PADAGOGISCHE PSYCHOLOGIE | 2023年 / 37卷 / 04期
关键词
Interest; self-concept; school subject; academic achievement; commonality analysis; ACADEMIC-ACHIEVEMENT; TEST-SCORES; COMMONALITY ANALYSIS; REPORTED GRADES; MOTIVATION; MODEL; ACCURACY; EFFICACY; QUESTIONNAIRES; INTELLIGENCE;
D O I
10.1024/1010-0652/a000344
中图分类号
G44 [教育心理学];
学科分类号
0402 ; 040202 ;
摘要
Academic interest and academic self-concept are important correlated motivational variables.Their common factorial structure and their shared (confounded) and non-shared (unique) power for predicting subject-tied academic achievement has not yet been satisfactorily investigated. This study investigated 588 Chinese adolescents. Two subject-tied interests and the corresponding subject-tied self-concepts were measured. The associated school marks were collected. The major subject German (first foreign language) was chosen to represent the verbal oriented school subjects, the major subject Maths was chosen to represent the numerical oriented ones. Confirmatory factor analyses (CFAs) evidenced two motivational factors (academic interest and academic self-concept) within each school subject and two subject factors (German and Maths) within each motivational construct. Joined CFAs (which included all interest as well as all self-concept items) revealed four factors (interest German, interest Maths, self-concept German, self-concept Maths). Accordingly, four motivational scales were formed. Each scale consisted of five items. The scales had high reliabilities and displayed good convergent-divergent validities. Both motivational scales together accounted for 41.0 % (German) and 22.3% (Maths) of the total achievement variance. Of these. the common (fused) shares were 19.8% (German) and 12.4% (Maths). The proportions of the total achievement variance that could be explained exclusively by only one of the two motivational variables amounted to 0.3 % (interest) and 20.9% (self-concept) for German. Theses figures were 0.1 % (interest) and 9.8% (self-concept) for Maths. The discussion underscores that subject-specific academic interest and subject-specific academic selfconcept, while highly correlated, should still be considered distinct constructs. A subject-tied self-concept remains an important predictor of academic achievement even after controlling for the assigned interest. The situation is different in the case of subject-tied interest. Its predictive power for academic achievement collapses after controlling for the associated selfconcept.
引用
收藏
页码:322 / 335
页数:14
相关论文
共 104 条
[1]   FACTOR-ANALYSIS AND AIC [J].
AKAIKE, H .
PSYCHOMETRIKA, 1987, 52 (03) :317-332
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2000, INTERESSE LERNMOTIVA
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2018, Handworterbuch Padagogische Psychologie
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2008, STUDIERENDENAUSWAHL
[5]   The Structure of Academic Self-Concept: A Methodological Review and Empirical Illustration of Central Models [J].
Arens, A. Katrin ;
Jansen, Malte ;
Preckel, Franzis ;
Schmidt, Isabelle ;
Brunner, Martin .
REVIEW OF EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH, 2021, 91 (01) :34-72
[6]   Longitudinal Relations Among Self-Concept, Intrinsic Value, and Attainment Value Across Secondary School Years in Three Academic Domains [J].
Arens, A. Katrin ;
Schmidt, Isabelle ;
Preckel, Franzis .
JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2019, 111 (04) :663-684
[7]  
Badewitz M.E., 2021, SCH LER INNEN STUDIE
[8]  
Baron S., 2019, PSYCHOGRAMM WELTMACH
[9]   Measurement Invariance in a Grid-Based Measure of Academic Self-Concept [J].
Baudson, Tanja Gabriele ;
Jung, Nora ;
Freund, Philipp Alexander .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT, 2017, 33 (06) :467-470
[10]   Academic self-concept and self-efficacy: How different are they really? [J].
Bong, M ;
Skaalvik, EM .
EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY REVIEW, 2003, 15 (01) :1-40