Understanding R&D transitions: From bottom to top?

被引:1
作者
Alvarez, Roberto [1 ]
Bravo-Ortega, Claudio [2 ,3 ]
Poniachik, Dan [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Chile, Dept Econ, Santiago, Chile
[2] Univ Adolfo Ibanez, Sch Business, Penalolen, Chile
[3] Diagonal Torres 2640, Santiago, Chile
关键词
R&D; Innovation; Productivity; Transitions; DEVELOPMENT EXPENDITURE; ECONOMIC-GROWTH; PRODUCTIVITY GROWTH; TECHNOLOGY FLOWS; INNOVATION; TRADE; SPECIALIZATION; INDUSTRY; EXPORTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecosys.2023.101143
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Over the last five decades a growing number of governments in developed and developing countries have implemented targeted policies to increase the R&D to GDP ratio. However, there is little evidence regarding the feasibility of achieving large and permanent changes in R&D investment. We study the incidence and effects of episodes of substantial acceleration in R&D expenditure, using a sample of 62 countries with data from 1960 to 2007. Among other exercises, we use propensity score matching, synthetic cohorts, and panel VAR, in order to elucidate the determinants and effects of important increases in R&D intensity. We find that transitions to higher levels of R&D-intensity are a relatively infrequent phenomenon which occurs at relatively high levels of R&D intensity. Looking at long-run changes in R&D, we corroborate that few countries have been able to raise their R&D intensity from the bottom quintile to the top quintile of the global distribution. Our findings indicate that income, physical investment, education, and the size of the manufacturing sector increase the likelihood of transition, whereas country size and FDI decrease it. We find that transitions are positively correlated with subsequent greater income levels, and weakly to TFP growth. Finally, in our Granger tests with panel VAR estimates, we find that R&D acceleration Granger causes GDP growth, the level of patents, high-tech ex-ports, and private and public R&D. In the case of private R&D, there is evidence of bidirectional causality with R&D acceleration.
引用
收藏
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Using the R&D capitalisation choice to explain the scale benefits of R&D investment
    Wu, Hai
    Thomas, Anne-Maree
    Wright, Sue
    AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 2020, 45 (04) : 579 - 606
  • [22] 'R&D and export performance: exploring heterogeneity along the export intensity distribution'
    Benfratello, L.
    Bottasso, A.
    Piccardo, C.
    JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL AND BUSINESS ECONOMICS, 2022, 49 (02): : 189 - 232
  • [23] R&D Spillovers for Public R&D Productivity
    Kwon, Hye Yeon
    Kwon, Illoong
    GLOBAL ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2019, 48 (03) : 334 - 349
  • [24] Multinationals and the globalization of R&D
    Garcia-Vega, Maria
    Hofmann, Patricia
    Kneller, Richard
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ORGANIZATION, 2019, 63 : 583 - 614
  • [25] Understanding transformational leadership and R&D culture in Malaysian universities
    Asmawi, Arnifa
    Zakaria, Sabarudin
    Wei, Chong Chin
    INNOVATION-ORGANIZATION & MANAGEMENT, 2013, 15 (03): : 287 - 304
  • [26] Air pollution, sustainable development, and corporate R&D: Evidence from emerging countries
    Liu, Peng
    Xu, Yuanyuan
    Lu, Jiajia
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2024, 369
  • [27] Investment in Research and Economic Growth: An empirical analysis from the perspective of the models of R&D
    Marroquin Arreola, Juan
    Rios Bolivar, Humberto
    INVESTIGACION ECONOMICA, 2012, 71 (282): : 15 - +
  • [28] Top R&D investors, structural change and the R&D growth performance of young and old firms
    Pietro Moncada-Paternò-Castello
    Eurasian Business Review, 2022, 12 : 1 - 33
  • [29] The impact of educated migrants and R&D expenditures on innovation
    Sinoi, Elena-Alexandra
    MANAGEMENT & MARKETING-CHALLENGES FOR THE KNOWLEDGE SOCIETY, 2021, 16 (01): : 13 - 25
  • [30] Corporate R&D and firm efficiency: evidence from Europe’s top R&D investors
    Subal C. Kumbhakar
    Raquel Ortega-Argilés
    Lesley Potters
    Marco Vivarelli
    Peter Voigt
    Journal of Productivity Analysis, 2012, 37 : 125 - 140