Moral Case Deliberation in Dutch Prisons: Experienced Outcomes and the Moral Learning of Prison Staff

被引:2
作者
Schaap, A. I. [1 ]
Molewijk, A. C. [1 ]
Stolper, M. M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Amsterdam, Dept Eth Law & Med Humanities, Med Ctr, De Boelelaan 1089a, NL-1081 HV Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
Prison staff; Ethics; Moral learning; Outcomes; Good performance; Mixed methods; ETHICS; CARE; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1007/s10610-023-09562-w
中图分类号
DF [法律]; D9 [法律];
学科分类号
0301 ;
摘要
We present a study about an ethics support instrument, Moral Case Deliberation (MCD), which is used to support and further professionalize Dutch prison staff. MCD can facilitate prison staff in dealing with moral dilemmas from practice. We present an embedded mixed-methods study on the experienced outcomes of 16 teams participating in both single and in series of MCD sessions. Prison staff and MCD facilitators completed evaluation forms (n = 871 by staff, and n = 122 by facilitators) after participating in a single MCD session (n = 131). Staff filled out another evaluation form (n = 149) after participating in a series of 10 MCD sessions. Our multilevel quantitative analyses show overall positive outcomes, with significant differences between professional disciplines. Prison staff, e.g., reported a better understanding of the discussed moral dilemma and the related perspectives of colleagues. The qualitative thematic content analysis of the experienced outcomes of single MCD sessions resulted in 8 outcome categories, e.g., improved moral awareness, awareness of responsibilities and limitations in decision-making, and feeling empowered to address issues. The experienced outcomes of MCD provide some insights in the process of fostering moral learning of prison staff; staff gained moral awareness, and improved their perspective-taking and the ability to better control their frustrations and emotions. Further research should focus on studying the impact of MCD on moral decision-making in the day-to-day practice of prison staff and on what the organization can learn from the MCD sessions.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 46 条
  • [1] Good Care in Ongoing Dialogue. Improving the Quality of Care Through Moral Deliberation and Responsive Evaluation
    Abma, Tineke A.
    Molewijk, Bert
    Widdershoven, Guy A. M.
    [J]. HEALTH CARE ANALYSIS, 2009, 17 (03) : 217 - 235
  • [2] Participatory action research
    Baum, Fran
    MacDougall, Colin
    Smith, Danielle
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY AND COMMUNITY HEALTH, 2006, 60 (10) : 854 - 857
  • [3] Understanding and facilitating moral learning in adults
    Brookfield, S
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MORAL EDUCATION, 1998, 27 (03) : 283 - 300
  • [4] Creswell J. W., 2017, Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches, V5th, DOI DOI 10.3109/08941939.2012.723954
  • [5] DCIA, 2016, VAKM VAKM DIV GW VB
  • [6] How to deal with moral challenges around the decision-making competence in transgender adolescent care? Development of an ethics support tool
    de Snoo-Trimp, Janine
    de Vries, Annelou
    Molewijk, Bert
    Hein, Irma
    [J]. BMC MEDICAL ETHICS, 2022, 23 (01)
  • [7] Field-testing the Euro-MCD Instrument: Experienced outcomes of moral case deliberation
    de Snoo-Trimp, Janine C.
    Molewijk, Bert
    Ursin, Goril
    Brinchmann, Berit Store
    Widdershoven, Guy A. M.
    de Vet, Henrica C. W.
    Svantesson, Mia
    [J]. NURSING ETHICS, 2020, 27 (02) : 390 - 406
  • [8] Organizational stressors associated with job stress and burnout in correctional officers: a systematic review
    Finney, Caitlin
    Stergiopoulos, Erene
    Hensel, Jennifer
    Bonato, Sarah
    Dewa, Carolyn S.
    [J]. BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, 2013, 13 : 82
  • [9] Gibbs J. C., 2014, MORAL DEV REALITY, P355
  • [10] Gilligan Carol., 1983, DIFFERENT VOICE PSYC