Iterative mapping of marine ecosystems for spatial status assessment, prioritization, and decision support

被引:6
作者
Sink, Kerry J. [1 ,2 ]
Adams, Luther A. [1 ]
Franken, Mari-Lise [1 ,3 ]
Harris, Linda R. [2 ]
Currie, Jock [1 ]
Karenyi, Natasha [3 ,4 ]
Dayaram, Anisha [1 ,5 ]
Porter, Sean [6 ]
Kirkman, Stephen [2 ,7 ]
Pfaff, Maya [3 ,7 ]
van Niekerk, Lara [2 ,8 ]
Atkinson, Lara J. [3 ,9 ]
Bernard, Anthony [10 ]
Bessinger, Mariel [1 ]
Cawthra, Hayley [11 ]
de Wet, Willem [12 ,13 ]
Dunga, Loyiso [1 ,3 ,14 ]
Filander, Zoleka [7 ]
Green, Andrew [14 ]
Herbert, David [15 ]
Holness, Stephen [2 ]
Lamberth, Stephen [2 ,16 ]
Livingstone, Tamsyn [17 ]
Luck-Vogel, Melanie [8 ,18 ]
Mackay, Fiona [6 ]
Makwela, Mapula [19 ]
Palmer, Ryan [10 ]
Van Zyl, Wilhem [11 ]
Skowno, Andrew [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] South African Natl Biodivers Inst, Cape Town, South Africa
[2] Nelson Mandela Univ, Inst Coastal & Marine Res, Gqeberha, South Africa
[3] Univ Cape Town, Biol Sci, Cape Town, South Africa
[4] Univ Cape Town, Ctr Stat Ecol Environm & Conservat, Cape Town, South Africa
[5] Univ Witwatersrand, Sch Anim Plant & Environm Sci, Restorat & Conservat Biol Res Grp, Johannesburg, South Africa
[6] Oceanog Res Inst, Durban, Kwa Zula Natal, South Africa
[7] Branch Oceans & Coasts, Dept Forestry Fisheries & Environm, Cape Town, South Africa
[8] CSIR, Coastal Syst Res Grp, Stellenbosch, South Africa
[9] South African Environm Observat Network, Egagasini Node, Cape Town, South Africa
[10] South African Inst Aquat Biodivers, Makhanda, South Africa
[11] Council Geosci, Geophys & Remote Sensing Unit, Cape Town, South Africa
[12] Univ Cape Town, Marine Res Inst, Cape Town, South Africa
[13] Univ Cape Town, Dept Geol Sci, Cape Town, South Africa
[14] Univ KwaZulu Natal, Geol Sci, Durban, South Africa
[15] Natl Museum Wales, Dept Nat Sci, Cardiff, Wales
[16] Branch Fisheries Res & Dev, Dept Forestry Fisheries & Environm, Cape Town, South Africa
[17] Ezemvelo KwaZulu Natal Wildlife, Pietermaritzburg, South Africa
[18] Stellenbosch Univ, Dept Geog & Environm Studies, Stellenbosch, South Africa
[19] Univ Western Cape, Biodivers & Conservat Biol, Bellville, South Africa
来源
FRONTIERS IN ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION | 2023年 / 11卷
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
ecosystem mapping; evidence-based biodiversity management; marine ecosystem map; ecosystem types; benthic ecosystems; pelagic ecosystems; BIOGEOGRAPHIC CLASSIFICATION; CAPE HAKE; COASTAL; IMPLEMENTATION; BIODIVERSITY; INTEGRATION; PROVINCES; FRAMEWORK; WORLD; SEAS;
D O I
10.3389/fevo.2023.1108118
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
South Africa has taken an iterative approach to marine ecosystem mapping over 18 years that has provided a valuable foundation for ecosystem assessment, planning and decision-making, supporting improved ecosystem-based management and protection. Iterative progress has been made in overcoming challenges faced by developing countries, especially in the inaccessible marine realm. Our aim is to report on the approach to produce and improve a national marine ecosystem map to guide other countries facing similar challenges, and to illustrate the impact of even the simplest ecosystem map. South Africa has produced four map versions, from a rudimentary map of 34 biozones informed by bathymetry data, to the latest version comprising 163 ecosystem types informed by 83 environmental and biodiversity datasets that aligns with the IUCN Global Ecosystem Typology. Data were unlocked through academic and industry collaborations; multi-disciplinary, multi-realm and multi-generational networks of practitioners; and targeted research to address key gaps. To advance toward a more transparent, reproducible and data-driven approach, limitations, barriers and opportunities for improvement were identified. Challenges included limited human and data infrastructure capacity to collate, curate and assimilate many data sources, covering a variety of ecosystem components, methods and scales. Five key lessons that are of relevance for others working to advance ecosystem classification and mapping, were distilled. These include (1) the benefits of iterative improvement; (2) the value of fostering relationships among a co-ordinated network of practitioners including early-career researchers; (3) strategically prioritizing and leveraging resources to build and curate key foundational biodiversity datasets and understand drivers of biodiversity pattern; (4) the need for developing, transferring and applying capacity and tools that enhance data quality, analytical workflows and outputs; and (5) the application of new technology and emerging statistical tools to improve the classification and prediction of biodiversity pattern. South Africa's map of marine ecosystem types has been successfully applied in spatial biodiversity assessment, prioritization to support protected area expansion and marine spatial planning. These successes demonstrate the value of a co-ordinated network of practitioners who continually build an evidence base and iteratively improve ecosystem mapping while simultaneously growing ecological knowledge and informing changing priorities and policy.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 21 条
  • [1] Development of a decision support system to manage contamination in marine ecosystems
    Dagnino, A.
    Viarengo, A.
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2014, 466 : 119 - 126
  • [2] Spatial models to support the management of coastal marine ecosystems: a short review of best practices in Liguria, Italy
    Vacchi, M.
    Montefalcone, M.
    Parravicini, V.
    Rovere, A.
    Vassallo, P.
    Ferrari, M.
    Morri, C.
    Bianchi, C. N.
    MEDITERRANEAN MARINE SCIENCE, 2014, 15 (01): : 189 - 197
  • [3] Current status, advancements and development needs of geospatial decision support tools for marine spatial planning in European seas
    Depellegrin, Daniel
    Hansen, Henning Sten
    Schroder, Lise
    Bergstrom, Lena
    Romagnoni, Giovanni
    Steenbeek, Jeroen
    Goncalves, Magali
    Carneiro, Goncalo
    Hammar, Linus
    Palsson, Jonas
    Crona, Jan Schmidtbauer
    Hume, Duncan
    Kotta, Jonne
    Fetissov, Mihhail
    Milos, Andzej
    Kaitaranta, Joni
    Menegon, Stefano
    OCEAN & COASTAL MANAGEMENT, 2021, 209 (209)
  • [4] Integrating fine-scale seafloor mapping and spatial pattern metrics into marine conservation prioritization
    Proudfoot, Beatrice
    Devillers, Rodolphe
    Brown, Craig J.
    AQUATIC CONSERVATION-MARINE AND FRESHWATER ECOSYSTEMS, 2020, 30 (08) : 1613 - 1625
  • [5] A risk-based approach to cumulative effects assessment for large marine ecosystems to support transboundary marine spatial planning: A case study of the yellow sea
    Ma, Chen
    Stelzenmueller, Vanessa
    Rehren, Jennifer
    Yu, Jing
    Zhang, Zhiwei
    Zheng, Hao
    Lin, Lu
    Yang, Hee-Cheol
    Jin, Yinhuan
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2023, 342
  • [6] MIDAS: A Spatial Decision Support System for Monitoring Marine Management Areas
    Patel, Hrishikesh
    Gopal, Sucharita
    Kaufman, Les
    Carleton, Matt
    Holden, Chris
    Pasquarella, Valerie
    Ribera, Marta
    Shank, Burton
    INTERNATIONAL REGIONAL SCIENCE REVIEW, 2011, 34 (02) : 191 - 214
  • [7] Ecosystem Service Mapping and Assessment as a Support for Policy and Decision Making
    Stepniewska, Malgorzata
    CLEAN-SOIL AIR WATER, 2016, 44 (10) : 1414 - 1422
  • [8] An environmental decision support system for spatial assessment and selective remediation
    Stewart, Robert N.
    Purucker, S. Thomas
    ENVIRONMENTAL MODELLING & SOFTWARE, 2011, 26 (06) : 751 - 760
  • [9] Environmental assessment in construction using a Spatial Decision Support System
    Ruiz, M. C.
    Fernandez, I.
    AUTOMATION IN CONSTRUCTION, 2009, 18 (08) : 1135 - 1143
  • [10] Regional economic and environmental analysis as a decision support for marine spatial planning in Xiamen
    Huang, Wei
    Corbett, James J.
    Jin, Di
    MARINE POLICY, 2015, 51 : 555 - 562