Going offshore or not: Where to generate hydrogen in future integrated energy systems?

被引:35
作者
Gea-Bermudez, Juan [1 ]
Bramstoft, Rasmus [1 ]
Koivisto, Matti [2 ]
Kitzing, Lena [2 ]
Ramos, Andres [3 ]
机构
[1] Tech Univ Denmark, Dept Management, Prod Storvet,Bygning 424, DK-2800 Lyngby, Denmark
[2] Tech Univ Denmark, Dept Wind & Energy Syst, Frederiksborgvej 399, DK-4000 Roskilde, Denmark
[3] Univ Pontificia Comillas, Escuela Tecn Super Ingn, Inst Invest Tecnol, Madrid 28015, Spain
关键词
Offshore; Hydrogen; Optimisation; Sustainability transition; Energy system; Modelling; SECTOR; WIND; ELECTRICITY; GRIDS; MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.enpol.2022.113382
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Hydrogen can be key in the energy system transition. We investigate the role of offshore hydrogen generation in a future integrated energy system. By performing energy system optimisation in a model application of the Northern-central European energy system and the North Sea offshore grid towards 2050, we find that offshore hydrogen generation may likely only play a limited role, and that offshore wind energy has higher value when sent to shore in the form of electricity. Forcing all hydrogen generation offshore would lead to increased energy system costs. Under the assumed scenario conditions, which result in deep decarbonisatiton of the energy system towards 2050, hydrogen generation - both onshore and offshore - follows solar PV generation patterns. Combined with hydrogen storage, this is the most cost-effective solution to satisfy future hydrogen demand. Overall, we find that the role of future offshore hydrogen generation should not simply be derived from minimising costs for the offshore sub-system, but by also considering the economic value that such generation would create for the whole integrated energy system. We find as a no-regret option to enable and promote the integration of offshore wind in onshore energy markets via electrical connections.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 58 条
  • [41] Nordic Energy Research and International Energy Agency, 2016, NORD EN TECHN PERSP
  • [42] Simulation of transcontinental wind and solar PV generation time series
    Nuno, Edgar
    Maule, Petr
    Hahmann, Andrea
    Cutululis, Nicolaos
    Sorensen, Poul
    Karagali, Ioanna
    [J]. RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2018, 118 : 425 - 436
  • [43] Unit commitment constraints in long-term planning models: Relevance, pitfalls and the role of assumptions on flexibility
    Poncelet, Kris
    Delarue, Erik
    D'haeseleer, William
    [J]. APPLIED ENERGY, 2020, 258
  • [44] A bottom-up estimation of the heating and cooling demand in European industry
    Rehfeldt, Matthias
    Fleiter, Tobias
    Toro, Felipe
    [J]. ENERGY EFFICIENCY, 2018, 11 (05) : 1057 - 1082
  • [45] ENSPRESO - an open, EU-28 wide, transparent and coherent database of wind, solar and biomass energy potentials
    Ruiz, P.
    Nijs, W.
    Tarvydas, D.
    Sgobbi, A.
    Zucker, A.
    Pilli, R.
    Jonsson, R.
    Camia, A.
    Thiel, C.
    Hoyer-Klick, C.
    Dalla Longa, F.
    Kober, T.
    Badger, J.
    Volker, P.
    Elbersen, B. S.
    Brosowski, A.
    Thraen, D.
    [J]. ENERGY STRATEGY REVIEWS, 2019, 26
  • [46] An overview of second generation biofuel technologies
    Sims, Ralph E. H.
    Mabee, Warren
    Saddler, Jack N.
    Taylor, Michael
    [J]. BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2010, 101 (06) : 1570 - 1580
  • [47] Swisher Philip, 2020, MODELLING POLITICAL
  • [48] The European Commission, 2020, CLIM STRAT TARG
  • [49] The European Commission, 2020, HYDROGEN
  • [50] The European Commission, 2020, EU STRAT EN SYST INT