The impact of varying levels of residual disease following cytoreductive surgery on survival outcomes in patients with ovarian cancer: a meta-analysis

被引:4
作者
Chase, Dana M. [1 ]
Mahajan, Anadi [2 ]
Scott, David Alexander [2 ]
Hawkins, Neil [2 ]
Kalilani, Linda [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Los Angeles, David Geffen Sch Med, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
[2] Bridge Med, London, England
[3] GSK, Durham, NC USA
关键词
Meta-analysis; Ovarian cancer; Residual disease; Cytoreductive surgery; Clinical outcomes; ADVANCED-STAGE OVARIAN; INTERVAL DEBULKING SURGERY; EPITHELIAL OVARIAN; NEOADJUVANT CHEMOTHERAPY; PROGNOSTIC-FACTORS; IV OVARIAN; INTRAPERITONEAL CHEMOTHERAPY; PERITONECTOMY PROCEDURES; PLATINUM RESISTANCE; COMPLETE RESECTION;
D O I
10.1186/s12905-024-02977-5
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background Residual disease following cytoreductive surgery in patients with ovarian cancer has been associated with poorer survival outcomes compared with no residual disease. We performed a meta-analysis to assess the impact of varying levels of residual disease status on survival outcomes in patients with ovarian cancer who have undergone primary cytoreductive surgery or interval cytoreductive surgery in the setting of new therapies for this disease. Methods Medline, Embase, and Cochrane databases (January 2011 - July 2020) and grey literature, bibliographic and key conference proceedings, were searched for eligible studies. Fixed and random-effects meta-analyses compared progression and survival by residual disease level across studies. Heterogeneity between comparisons was explored via type of surgery, disease stage, and type of adjuvant chemotherapy. Results Of 2832 database and 16 supplementary search articles screened, 50 studies were selected; most were observational studies. The meta-analysis showed that median progression-free survival and overall survival decreased progressively with increasing residual disease (residual disease categories of 0 cm, > 0-1 cm and > 1 cm). Compared with no residual disease, hazard ratios (HR) for disease progression increased with increasing residual disease category (1.75 [95% confidence interval: 1.42, 2.16] for residual disease > 0-1 cm and 2.14 [1.34, 3.39] for residual disease > 1 cm), and also for reduced survival (HR versus no residual disease, 1.75 [ 1.62, 1.90] for residual disease > 0-1 cm and 2.32 [1.97, 2.72] for residual disease > 1 cm). All comparisons were significant (p < 0.05). Subgroup analyses showed an association between residual disease and disease progression/reduced survival irrespective of type of surgery, disease stage, or type of adjuvant chemotherapy. Conclusions This meta-analysis provided an update on the impact of residual disease following primary or interval cytoreductive surgery, and demonstrated that residual disease was still highly predictive of progression-free survival and overall survival in adults with ovarian cancer despite changes in ovarian cancer therapy over the last decade. Higher numerical categories of residual disease were associated with reduced survival than lower categories.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 81 条
  • [1] Towards Personalized Management of Ovarian Cancer
    Algethami, Mashael
    Kulkarni, Sanat
    Sadiq, Maaz T.
    Tang, Hiu K. C.
    Brownlie, Juliette
    Jeyapalan, Jennie N.
    Mongan, Nigel P.
    Rakha, Emad A.
    Madhusudan, Srinivasan
    [J]. CANCER MANAGEMENT AND RESEARCH, 2022, 14 : 3469 - 3483
  • [2] Allen D. G., 1995, European Journal of Gynaecological Oncology, V16, P349
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2012, National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, Technology appraisal guidance [TA266
  • [4] [Anonymous], Survival rates for ovarian cancer
  • [5] FDAApproval Summary: Olaparib Monotherapy or in Combination with Bevacizumab for the Maintenance Treatment of Patients with Advanced Ovarian Cancer
    Arora, Shaily
    Balasubramaniam, Sanjeeve
    Zhang, Hui
    Berman, Tara
    Narayan, Preeti
    Suzman, Daniel
    Bloomquist, Erik
    Tang, Shenghui
    Gong, Yutao
    Sridhara, Rajeshwari
    Turcu, Francisca Reyes
    Chatterjee, Deb
    Saritas-Yildirim, Banu
    Ghosh, Soma
    Philip, Reena
    Pathak, Anand
    Gao, Jennifer J.
    Amiri-Kordestani, Laleh
    Pazdur, Richard
    Beaver, Julia A.
    [J]. ONCOLOGIST, 2021, 26 (01) : E164 - E172
  • [6] Skeletal Muscle Attenuation (Sarcopenia) Predicts Reduced Overall Survival in Patients with Advanced Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Undergoing Primary Debulking Surgery
    Ataseven, Beyhan
    Luengo, Teresa Gonzalez
    du Bois, Andreas
    Waltering, Kai-Uwe
    Traut, Alexander
    Heitz, Florian
    Alesina, Pier Francesco
    Prader, Sonia
    Meier, Beate
    Schneider, Stephanie
    Koch, Jens-Albrecht
    Walz, Martin
    Groeben, Harald-Thomas
    Nina, Pauly
    Brunkhorst, Violeta
    Heikaus, Sebastian
    Harter, Philipp
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2018, 25 (11) : 3372 - 3379
  • [7] Prognostic impact of debulking surgery and residual tumor in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer FIGO stage IV
    Ataseven, Beyhan
    Grimm, Christoph
    Harter, Philipp
    Heitz, Florian
    Traut, Alexander
    Prader, Sonia
    du Bois, Andreas
    [J]. GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2016, 140 (02) : 215 - 220
  • [8] Prognostic value of lymph node ratio in patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer
    Ataseven, Beyhan
    Grimm, Christoph
    Harter, Philipp
    Prader, Sonia
    Traut, Alexander
    Heitz, Florian
    du Bois, Andreas
    [J]. GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2014, 135 (03) : 435 - 440
  • [9] Role of histological type on surgical outcome and survival following radical primary tumour debulking of epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube and peritoneal cancers
    Braicu, E-I
    Sehouli, J.
    Richter, R.
    Pietzner, K.
    Denkert, C.
    Fotopoulou, C.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2011, 105 (12) : 1818 - 1824
  • [10] Analysis of racial disparities in stage IIIC epithelial ovarian cancer care and outcomes in a Tertiary Gynecologic Oncology Referral Center
    Bristow, Robert E.
    Ueda, Stefanie
    Gerardi, Melissa A.
    Ajiboye, Onaopemipo B.
    Ibeanu, Okechukwu A.
    [J]. GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2011, 122 (02) : 319 - 323