Performance of cognitive vs. image-guided fusion biopsy for detection of overall and clinically significant prostate cancer in a multiethnic population

被引:2
作者
Ho, Kevin [1 ]
Zhu, Denzel [1 ,2 ]
Gupta, Kavita [3 ]
Loloi, Justin [3 ]
Abramson, Max [1 ]
Watts, Kara [1 ,3 ]
Agalliu, Ilir [3 ,4 ]
Sankin, Alexander [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Albert Einstein Coll Med, Bronx, NY 10461 USA
[2] Univ Rochester, Dept Urol, Med Ctr, Rochester, NY USA
[3] Albert Einstein Coll Med, Dept Urol, Montefiore Med Ctr, Bronx, NY 10461 USA
[4] Albert Einstein Coll Med, Dept Epidemiol & Populat Hlth, Bronx, NY USA
关键词
Biopsy; Prostate cancer; Hispanic; Black or African American; ACCURACY; MRI;
D O I
10.1016/j.urolonc.2023.11.005
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: Transrectal ultrasound -guided prostate biopsy remains the most used method for the detection of prostate cancer. We recently reported that detection of clinically significant prostate cancer (cs-CaP) using image -guided fusion biopsies (IGFB) varied by race/ethnicity, which calls for further comparison between cognitive fusion biopsy (CFB) and IGFB among non -Hispanic black and Hispanic populations. Therefore, the aim of our study is to compare the rates of detection of cs-CaP and overall CaP by CFB and IGFB in a multiethnic community. Material and methods: We performed a retrospective, cross-sectional review of men who underwent MRI-transrectal ultrasoundguided prostate biopsy at our diverse, urban academic medical center. Agreement and discordance between fusion biopsies and systematic biopsies for detection of cs-CaP and overall CaP were determined using Kappa statistics. Univariate and multivariate mixed -effects logistic regression models were used to find associations between fusion modalities and prostate cancer detection. Results: In total, 710 men underwent fusion prostate biopsies between December 2015 and June 2021. Upon univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis, there was no significant association between IGFB vs. CFB and risk of overall CaP (OR = 0.66, 95% CI: 0.36 -1.21, P = 0.18) or cs-CaP (OR = 0.57, 95% CI: 0.30-1.08, P = 0.09). We found moderate agreement between fusion and systematic biopsies for both CFB (K = 0.56) and IGFB (K = 0.52) in cs-CaP. Conclusions: CFB and IGFB offer similar detection rates of cs-CaP in a multiethnic population. CFB represents an effective and accessible means of accurately diagnosing prostate cancer. (c) 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:29e1 / 29e8
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Multiple Regions of Interest on Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging are Not Associated with Increased Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer on Fusion Biopsy
    Patel, Neal
    Halpern, Joshua A.
    Kasabwala, Khushabu
    Cricco-Lizza, Eliza
    Herman, Michael
    Margolis, Daniel
    Xu, Chris
    Robinson, Brian D.
    Wang, Yi
    McClure, Timothy
    Hu, Jim C.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2018, 200 (03) : 559 - 563
  • [32] Reasons for missing clinically significant prostate cancer by targeted magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasound fusion-guided biopsy
    Klingebiel, M.
    Arsov, C.
    Ullrich, T.
    Quentin, M.
    Al-Monajjed, R.
    Mally, D.
    Sawicki, L. M.
    Hiester, A.
    Esposito, I
    Albers, P.
    Antoch, G.
    Schimmoeller, L.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2021, 137
  • [33] Effectiveness of Bi-Parametric MR/US Fusion Biopsy for Detecting Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer in Prostate Biopsy Naive Men
    Kim, Young Joo
    Huh, Jung Sik
    Park, Kyung Kgi
    YONSEI MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2019, 60 (04) : 346 - 351
  • [34] Comparative diagnostic accuracy of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging-ultrasound fusion-guided biopsy versus systematic biopsy for clinically significant prostate cancer
    Fang, Jian-hua
    Zhang, Liqing
    Xie, Xi
    Zhao, Pan
    Bao, Lingyun
    Kong, Fanlei
    PEERJ, 2023, 11
  • [35] Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Using Targeted Biopsy with Four Cores Versus Target Saturation Biopsy with Nine Cores in Transperineal Prostate Fusion Biopsy: A Prospective Randomized Trial
    Saner, Yasemin Melisa
    Wiesenfarth, Manuel
    Weru, Vivienn
    Ladyzhensky, Boris
    Tschirdewahn, Stephan
    Puellen, Lukas
    Bonekamp, David
    Reis, Henning
    Krafft, Ulrich
    Hethorn, Jochen
    Kesch, Claudia
    Darr, Christopher
    Forsting, Michael
    Wetter, Axel
    Umutlu, Lale
    Haubold, Johannes
    Hadaschik, Boris
    Radtke, Jan Philipp
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY ONCOLOGY, 2023, 6 (01): : 49 - 55
  • [36] Does magnetic resonance imaging-guided biopsy improve prostate cancer detection? A comparison of systematic, cognitive fusion and ultrasound fusion prostate biopsy
    Kam, Jonathan
    Yuminaga, Yuigi
    Kim, Raymond
    Aluwihare, Kushlan
    Macneil, Finlay
    Ouyang, Rupert
    Ruthven, Stephen
    Louie-Johnsun, Mark
    PROSTATE INTERNATIONAL, 2018, 6 (03) : 88 - 93
  • [37] Prostate 3D ultrasound-guided imaging device (HistoScanning) performance detecting clinically significant prostate cancer
    Vezelis, Alvydas
    Platkevicius, Gediminas
    Kincius, Marius
    Naruseviciute, Ieva
    Ulys, Albertas
    Jankevicius, Feliksas
    JOURNAL OF BUON, 2020, 25 (01): : 460 - 463
  • [38] Superior detection of significant prostate cancer by transperineal prostate biopsy using MRI-transrectal ultrasound fusion image guidance over cognitive registration
    Ito, Masaya
    Yonese, Ichiro
    Toide, Masahiro
    Ikuta, Shuzo
    Kobayashi, Shuichiro
    Koga, Fumitaka
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2023, 28 (11) : 1545 - 1553
  • [39] Superior detection of significant prostate cancer by transperineal prostate biopsy using MRI-transrectal ultrasound fusion image guidance over cognitive registration
    Masaya Ito
    Ichiro Yonese
    Masahiro Toide
    Shuzo Ikuta
    Shuichiro Kobayashi
    Fumitaka Koga
    International Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2023, 28 : 1545 - 1553
  • [40] MRI in-bore biopsy following MRI/US fusion-guided biopsy in patients with persistent suspicion of clinically significant prostate cancer
    Quentin, M.
    Boschheidgen, M.
    Radtke, J. P.
    Spohn, F.
    Ullrich, T.
    Drewes, L.
    Valentin, B.
    Lakes, J.
    Al-Monajjed
    Arsov, C.
    Esposito, I
    Albers, P.
    Antoch, G.
    Schimmoeller, L.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2024, 175