Development and testing of patient-centered education about hormone replacement therapy for women at high genetic risk of breast and ovarian cancer

被引:0
作者
Penvose, Katherine N. [1 ]
Reed, Shelby D. [2 ]
Sepulveda, Juan Marcos Gonzalez [2 ]
Mastylak, Alicja [2 ]
Scott, Amelia [3 ]
Hayes, Taylor [3 ]
Shank, Juliana [4 ]
Havrilesky, Laura J. [3 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Duke Univ, Duke Univ Hlth Syst, Sch Med, Durham, NC 27710 USA
[2] Duke Univ, Duke Clin Res Inst, Preference Evaluat Res Grp, Durham, NC 27710 USA
[3] Duke Canc Inst, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Div Gynecol Oncol, Durham, NC USA
[4] Duke Univ, Durham, NC 27710 USA
[5] Duke Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Box 3079, Durham, NC 27710 USA
关键词
BRCA; Risk-reducing; Hormone replacement therapy; HRT; Education; Preferences; POSTMENOPAUSAL WOMEN; ENDOMETRIAL CANCER; HEALTH; BRCA1; ESTROGEN;
D O I
10.1016/j.ygyno.2023.11.022
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Objective. In this study, we aimed to develop education to assist BRCA mutation carriers in making informed decisions about HRT in the context of risk-reducing surgery, while simultaneously clarifying their treatment -specific values and reducing decisional conflict. Methods. We enrolled premenopausal BRCA mutation carriers ages 19-49 without prior cancer or risk -reducing salpingo-oophorectomy to structured interviews in which they reviewed education about the risks and benefits of HRT. Materials included literature-derived data demonstrating associations between HRT and commonly considered health outcomes (breast cancer, vasomotor symptoms, sexual functioning, cardiovascular disease, osteoporosis, and blood clots). Participants completed the 16-item Decisional Conflict Scale (DCS) before and after education, communicated their preferences by rating and ranking the six outcomes, and provided feed-back to inform iterative revisions of the educational content. Results. 25 participants completed interviews. DCS scores decreased significantly from 54.6 to 22.8 following education (p < 0.001); sub-scores for uncertainty (71.7 to 37.3), informed (71.7 to 15.3), values clarity (53.7 to 17.0), effective decision (44.2 to 25.5), and support (35.0 to 17.7) also decreased significantly. Participants ranked cardiovascular disease as the most important outcome to consider, followed by breast cancer, osteoporosis, blood clots, decline in sexual function, and hot flashes. Participants with prior mastectomy (N = 10) ranked breast cancer as the most important outcome 25% of the time, compared to 80% in participants without mastectomy (N = 15). Conclusion. Following education, BRCA mutation carriers had significantly less decisional conflict regarding the choice to use HRT. This pilot study was successful in generating a prototype educational aid for further testing. (c) 2023 Published by Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:91 / 98
页数:8
相关论文
共 28 条
  • [1] Controversies in Hereditary Cancer Management
    AlHilli, Mariam M.
    Pederson, Holly J.
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2021, 137 (05) : 941 - 955
  • [2] Effects of conjugated, equine estrogen in postmenopausal women with hysterectomy - The women's health initiative randomized controlled trial
    Anderson, GL
    Limacher, M
    Assaf, AR
    Bassford, T
    Beresford, SAA
    Black, H
    Bonds, D
    Brunner, R
    Brzyski, R
    Caan, B
    Chlebowski, R
    Curb, D
    Gass, M
    Hays, J
    Heiss, G
    Hendrix, S
    Howard, BV
    Hsia, J
    Hubbell, A
    Jackson, R
    Johnson, KC
    Judd, H
    Kotchen, JM
    Kuller, L
    LaCroix, AZ
    Lane, D
    Langer, RD
    Lasser, N
    Lewis, CE
    Manson, J
    Margolis, K
    Ockene, J
    O'Sullivan, MJ
    Phillips, L
    Prentice, RL
    Ritenbaugh, C
    Robbins, J
    Rossouw, JE
    Sarto, G
    Stefanick, ML
    Van Horn, L
    Wactawski-Wende, J
    Wallace, R
    Wassertheil-Smoller, S
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2004, 291 (14): : 1701 - 1712
  • [3] Average risks of breast and ovarian cancer associated with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations detected in case series unselected for family history:: A combined analysis of 22 studies
    Antoniou, A
    Pharoah, PDP
    Narod, S
    Risch, HA
    Eyfjord, JE
    Hopper, JL
    Loman, N
    Olsson, H
    Johannsson, O
    Borg, Å
    Pasini, B
    Radice, P
    Manoukian, S
    Eccles, DM
    Tang, N
    Olah, E
    Anton-Culver, H
    Warner, E
    Lubinski, J
    Gronwald, J
    Gorski, B
    Tulinius, H
    Thorlacius, S
    Eerola, H
    Nevanlinna, H
    Syrjäkoski, K
    Kallioniemi, OP
    Thompson, D
    Evans, C
    Peto, J
    Lalloo, F
    Evans, DG
    Easton, DF
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS, 2003, 72 (05) : 1117 - 1130
  • [4] PATIENT REACTIONS TO A PROGRAM DESIGNED TO FACILITATE PATIENT PARTICIPATION IN TREATMENT DECISIONS FOR BENIGN PROSTATIC HYPERPLASIA
    BARRY, MJ
    FOWLER, FJ
    MULLEY, AG
    HENDERSON, JV
    WENNBERG, JE
    [J]. MEDICAL CARE, 1995, 33 (08) : 771 - 782
  • [5] Beral V, 2005, LANCET, V365, P1543, DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)66455-0
  • [6] Menopausal symptoms and bone health in women undertaking risk reducing bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy: significant bone health issues in those not taking HRT
    Challberg, J.
    Ashcroft, L.
    Lalloo, F.
    Eckersley, B.
    Clayton, R.
    Hopwood, P.
    Selby, P.
    Howell, A.
    Evans, D. G.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2011, 105 (01) : 22 - 27
  • [7] Penetrance of Breast and Ovarian Cancer in Women Who Carry a BRCA1/2 Mutation and Do Not Use Risk-Reducing Salpingo-Oophorectomy: An Updated Meta-Analysis
    Chen, Jinbo
    Bae, Eunchan
    Zhang, Lingjiao
    Hughes, Kevin
    Parmigiani, Giovanni
    Braun, Danielle
    Rebbeck, Timothy R.
    [J]. JNCI CANCER SPECTRUM, 2020, 4 (04)
  • [8] Meta-analysis of BRCA1 and BRCA2 penetrance
    Chen, Sining
    Parmigiani, Giovanni
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2007, 25 (11) : 1329 - 1333
  • [9] NCCN Guidelines® Insights Genetic/Familial High-Risk Assessment: Breast and Ovarian, Version 2.2017 Featured Updates to the NCCN Guidelines
    Daly, Mary B.
    Pilarski, Robert
    Berry, Michael
    Buys, Saundra S.
    Farmer, Meagan
    Friedman, Susan
    Garber, Judy E.
    Kauff, Noah D.
    Khan, Seema
    Klein, Catherine
    Kohlmann, Wendy
    Kurian, Allison
    Litton, Jennifer K.
    Madlensky, Lisa
    Merajver, Sofia D.
    Offit, Kenneth
    Pal, Tuya
    Reiser, Gwen
    Shannon, Kristen Mahoney
    Swisher, Elizabeth
    Vinayak, Shaveta
    Voian, Nicoleta C.
    Weitzel, Jeffrey N.
    Wick, Myra J.
    Wiesner, Georgia L.
    Dwyer, Mary
    Darlow, Susan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL COMPREHENSIVE CANCER NETWORK, 2017, 15 (01): : 9 - 19
  • [10] Developing a quality criteria framework for patient decision aids: online international Delphi consensus process
    Elwyn, Glyn
    O'Connor, Annette
    Stacey, Dawn
    Volk, Robert
    Edwards, Adrian
    Coulter, Angela
    Thomson, Richard
    Barrat, Alexandra
    Butow, Phyllis
    Barry, Michael
    Mulley, Albert G.
    Sepucha, Karen
    Bernstein, Steven
    Clarke, Aileen
    Entwistle, Vikki
    Feldman-Stewart, Deb
    Holmes-Rovner, Margaret
    Llewellyn-Thomas, Hilary
    Moumjid, Nora
    Ruland, Cornelia
    Sykes, Alan
    Whelan, Tim
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2006, 333 (7565): : 417 - 419