Government environmental concerns and corporate green innovation: Evidence from heavy-polluting enterprises in China

被引:31
作者
Chen, Jinyu [1 ,2 ]
Zhu, Dandan [1 ]
Ding, Shijie [1 ]
Qu, Jingxiao [3 ]
机构
[1] Cent South Univ, Sch Business, Changsha 410083, Peoples R China
[2] Cent South Univ, Inst Met Resources Strategy, Changsha, Peoples R China
[3] Hunan Agr Univ, Econ Coll, Changsha, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
crowding-out effect; government environmental concerns; green innovation; heavy-polluting enterprises; leverage effect; PERFORMANCE; INVESTMENT; EXPLORATION; PRESSURE;
D O I
10.1002/bse.3583
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The objective of this study is to examine the impact of government environmental concerns on green innovation and whether this has a "leverage effect" or a "crowding-out effect." This study employs a two-way fixed-effects model to conduct an empirical test using panel data from 2010 to 2020 on Chinese firms listed in heavy-polluting industries. The results suggest that an increase in government environmental concerns can promote corporate green innovation. However, government environmental concerns primarily stimulate strategic innovation rather than substantive innovation. After a series of robustness and endogeneity tests, the conclusions of this paper still hold. Corporate green innovation induced by government environmental concerns is not the "leverage effect" superimposed on existing innovation activities but the "crowding-out effect" of other technological innovation. The heterogeneity tests in this paper indicate that the impact is more pronounced for firms with poorer environmental conditions, stronger political connections, and richer executive backgrounds.
引用
收藏
页码:1920 / 1936
页数:17
相关论文
共 143 条
[1]  
Abdul Wahab N.S., 2018, Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, V32, P30, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.INTACCAUDTAX.2018.07.002
[2]   Financial development and green innovation, the ultimate solutions to an environmentally sustainable society: Evidence from leading economies [J].
Abid N. ;
Ceci F. ;
Ahmad F. ;
Aftab J. .
Journal of Cleaner Production, 2022, 369
[3]   Social and environmental practices and corporate financial performance of multinational corporations in emerging markets: Evidence from 20 oil-rich African countries [J].
Adams, Dawda ;
Adams, Kweku ;
Attah-Boakye, Rexford ;
Ullah, Subhan ;
Rodgers, Waymond ;
Kimani, Danson .
RESOURCES POLICY, 2022, 78
[4]   A resource-based perspective of value generation through enterprise architecture management [J].
Ahlemann, Frederik ;
Legner, Christine ;
Lux, Johannes .
INFORMATION & MANAGEMENT, 2021, 58 (01)
[5]   Environmental Issues and Strategic Corporate Social Responsibility for Organizational Competitiveness [J].
Ahmed, Rizwan Raheem ;
Streimikiene, Dalia .
JOURNAL OF COMPETITIVENESS, 2021, 13 (02) :5-22
[6]   The entrepreneurship of resource-based theory [J].
Alvarez, SA ;
Busenitz, LW .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 2001, 27 (06) :755-775
[8]   Green corporate image: moderating the connection between environmental product innovation and firm performance [J].
Amores-Salvado, Javier ;
Martin-de Castro, Gregorio ;
Navas-Lopez, Jose E. .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2014, 83 :356-365
[9]   Resource constraints, innovation capability and corporate financial fraud in entrepreneurial firms [J].
An, Wenwen ;
Xu, Yuehua ;
Zhang, Jianqi .
CHINESE MANAGEMENT STUDIES, 2018, 12 (01) :2-18
[10]   How Do Active Firms Implementing Corporate Environmental Responsibility Take Technological Approaches to Environmental Issues? A Resource-Allocation Perspective [J].
Bae, Jong-Wan ;
Kim, Sang-Joon .
SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 14 (14)