Modeling Social, Dimensional, and Temporal Comparisons in Self-Concept Development With the Random Intercept Cross-Lagged Panel Model: A Methodological-Substantive Integration

被引:4
作者
Debatin, Tobias [1 ]
Stoeger, Heidrun [1 ]
Ziegler, Albert [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Regensburg, Dept Educ Sci, Univ Str 31, D-93053 Regensburg, Germany
[2] Univ Erlangen Nurnberg, Dept Educ Psychol, Nurnberg, Germany
关键词
academic self-concept; development; dimensional comparisons; STEM; random intercept cross-lagged panel model; RECIPROCAL INTERNAL/EXTERNAL FRAME; ACADEMIC-ACHIEVEMENT; CAUSAL INFERENCE; PATH-ANALYSIS; PERSPECTIVE; INTERPLAY; DOMAINS; VALUES; MATH;
D O I
10.1037/dev0001568
中图分类号
B844 [发展心理学(人类心理学)];
学科分类号
040202 ;
摘要
In recent years, discussion of the limitations of the standard cross-lagged panel model (CLPM) has increased, and the random intercept cross-lagged panel model (RI-CLPM) has been proposed as an improved approach to modeling. By now, there are some first applications of the model to investigate reciprocal relations in self-concept development. However, a methodological-substantive integration of the model in the context of the three major comparison processes in self-concept development is still missing, and it has not been used to evaluate dimensional and temporal comparison effects. We provide such an integration in self-concept theory and applied the RI-CLPM to investigate social, dimensional, and temporal comparison effects simultaneously. Investigating a sample of 701 German students from the middle of Grade 9 to the middle of Grade 10, we confirmed previous results by finding trait-like stability in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) self-concept as well as in STEM and language achievement. We also found evidence for all three comparison effects, but evidence for dimensional comparison effects was only found at the between-person level of the RI-CLPM.
引用
收藏
页码:1595 / 1607
页数:13
相关论文
共 74 条
[1]   TEMPORAL COMPARISON THEORY [J].
ALBERT, S .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1977, 84 (06) :485-503
[2]  
Allison P.D., 2017, SOCIUS, V3, p2378023117710578, DOI DOI 10.1177/2378023117710578
[3]   Inferential Statistics as Descriptive Statistics: There Is No Replication Crisis if We Don't Expect Replication [J].
Amrhein, Valentin ;
Trafinnow, David ;
Greenland, Sander .
AMERICAN STATISTICIAN, 2019, 73 :262-270
[4]   Equivalent Approaches to Dealing With Unobserved Heterogeneity in Cross-Lagged Panel Models? Investigating the Benefits and Drawbacks of the Latent Curve Model With Structured Residuals and the Random Intercept Cross-Lagged Panel Model [J].
Andersen, Henrik Kenneth .
PSYCHOLOGICAL METHODS, 2022, 27 (05) :730-751
[5]   Social and dimensional comparisons in math and verbal test anxiety: Within- and cross-domain relations with achievement and the mediating role of academic self-concept [J].
Arens, A. Katrin ;
Becker, Michael ;
Moeller, Jens .
CONTEMPORARY EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2017, 51 :240-252
[6]   Reciprocal Effects of Reading and Mathematics? Beyond the Cross-Lagged Panel Model [J].
Bailey, Drew H. ;
Oh, Yoonkyung ;
Farkas, George ;
Morgan, Paul ;
Hillemeier, Marianne .
DEVELOPMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2020, 56 (05) :912-921
[7]   On the Practical Interpretability of Cross-Lagged PanelModels: Rethinking a Developmental Workhorse [J].
Berry, Daniel ;
Willoughby, Michael T. .
CHILD DEVELOPMENT, 2017, 88 (04) :1186-1206
[8]   Re-examining the reciprocal effects model of self-concept, self-efficacy, and academic achievement in a comparison of the Cross-Lagged Panel and Random-Intercept Cross-Lagged Panel frameworks [J].
Burns, Richard A. ;
Crisp, Dimity A. ;
Burns, Robert B. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2020, 90 (01) :77-91
[9]   Testing mediational models with longitudinal data: Questions and tips in the use of structural equation modeling [J].
Cole, DA ;
Maxwell, SE .
JOURNAL OF ABNORMAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2003, 112 (04) :558-577
[10]  
Cole DA, 2014, PSYCHOL METHODS, V19, P300, DOI 10.1037/a0033805