Using precision livestock farming for dairy herd management

被引:3
|
作者
Loucka, Radko [1 ]
Jancik, Filip [1 ]
Kumprechtova, Dana [1 ]
Koukolova, Veronika [1 ]
Kubelkova, Petra [1 ]
Tyrolova, Yvona [1 ]
Vyborna, Alena [1 ]
Joch, Miroslav [1 ]
Jambor, Vaclav [2 ]
Synkova, Hana [2 ]
Mala, Soma [2 ]
Nedelnik, Jan [3 ]
Lang, Jaroslav [3 ]
Homolka, Petr [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Inst Anim Sci, Prague, Czech Republic
[2] NutriVet Ltd, Pohorelice, Czech Republic
[3] Agr Res Ltd Troubsko, Troubsko, Czech Republic
[4] Czech Univ Life Sci Prague, Dept Microbiol Nutr & Dietet, Prague, Czech Republic
关键词
ruminant nutrition; rumination; rumen pH measuring bolus; milk yield; COWS; BREED; TIME;
D O I
10.17221/180/2022-CJAS
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
The aim of this study was to validate selected precision livestock farming (PLF) methods of nutrition and feeding management of high-yielding Holstein dairy cows. In a feeding trial with 36 dairy cows, the effect of replacing 0.1 kg of sodium bicarbonate in the control total mixed ration (TMR-C) with 1 kg of wheat straw in the experimental total mixed ration (TMR-S) on the physiological status of cows and the amount of milk produced (milk yield, MY) was investigated. Feed intake time (FT), as measured using tensometric feed troughs (TFT), was significantly longer with TMR-S (188 min) than with TMR-C (157 min). Differences between TMR-C and TMR-S were not significant for FT or rumination time (RT), as measured by a sensor in the collar (VSC). There was only a weak correlation between the two technologies (TFT vs. VSC) for FT (r = 0.27). Differences between TMR-C and TMR-S were not significant for values measured in rumen fluid (pH, acid and ammonia levels) nor for values measured by sensors in the milking parlour (MY, fat and protein percentage of milk). Milk analysis in the laboratory showed that the cows fed TMR-C had higher urea (26.6 vs. 22.7 mg/100 ml) and free fatty acid (0.87 vs. 0.33 mmol/100 g) levels in milk. Moderate correlations were between TMR intake and MY (r = 0.55); between MY and milk fat (r =-0.46); between milk fat and milk protein (r = 0.63); and between milk fat and milk protein measured by sensors and in the laboratory (r = 0.47 and r = 0.42, respectively). In view of the above results, further research and data validation for each technology are needed.
引用
收藏
页码:111 / 121
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Grand Challenge in Precision Livestock Farming
    Rosa, Guilherme J. M.
    FRONTIERS IN ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2021, 2
  • [32] Precision livestock farming in egg production
    Xin, Hongwei
    Liu, Kai
    ANIMAL FRONTIERS, 2017, 7 (01) : 24 - 31
  • [33] A Framework for Transparency in Precision Livestock Farming
    Elliott, Kevin C.
    Werkheiser, Ian
    ANIMALS, 2023, 13 (21):
  • [34] General introduction to precision livestock farming
    Berckmans, D.
    ANIMAL FRONTIERS, 2017, 7 (01) : 6 - 11
  • [35] Precision farming in extensive livestock systems
    Bocquier, F.
    Debus, N.
    Lurette, A.
    Maton, C.
    Viudes, G.
    Moulin, C. -H.
    Jouven, M.
    INRA PRODUCTIONS ANIMALES, 2014, 27 (02): : 101 - 111
  • [36] Engineering advances in Precision Livestock Farming
    Norton, Tomas
    Berckmans, Daniel
    BIOSYSTEMS ENGINEERING, 2018, 173 : 1 - 3
  • [37] Experiences of a precision livestock farming project
    Koenyves Laszlo
    Reibling Tamas
    Bodor Andras
    Brydl Endre
    Adorjan Andras
    Solymosi Norbert
    MAGYAR ALLATORVOSOK LAPJA, 2015, 137 (12) : 719 - 727
  • [38] Lactation curve model with explicit representation of perturbations as a phenotyping tool for dairy livestock precision farming
    Ben Abdelkrim, A.
    Puillet, L.
    Gomes, P.
    Martin, O.
    ANIMAL, 2021, 15 (01)
  • [39] Driving factors behind precision livestock farming tools adoption: The case of the pedometer on dairy farms
    Selvaggi, R.
    Pappalardo, G.
    Zarba, C.
    Lusk, J. L.
    AGRICULTURAL SYSTEMS, 2024, 220
  • [40] Animal board invited review: precision livestock farming for dairy cows with a focus on oestrus detection
    Mottram, T.
    ANIMAL, 2016, 10 (10) : 1575 - 1584