Managing genomic diversity in conservation programs of Chinese domestic chickens

被引:9
|
作者
Zhang, Mengmeng [1 ,2 ]
Wang, Shiwei [1 ]
Xu, Ran [1 ]
Liu, Yijun [1 ,3 ]
Zhang, Han [1 ]
Sun, Mengxia [1 ]
Wang, Junyan [1 ]
Liu, Zhexi [1 ]
Wu, Keliang [1 ]
机构
[1] China Agr Univ, Coll Anim Sci & Technol, Beijing 100193, Peoples R China
[2] Beijing Capital Agribusiness Future Biotechnol Co, 75 Bingjiaokou Hutong, Beijing 100088, Peoples R China
[3] Southwest Univ, Coll Anim Sci, Chongqing 402460, Peoples R China
关键词
EFFECTIVE POPULATION-SIZE; ANIMAL GENETIC-RESOURCES; MITOCHONDRIAL-DNA; EVOLUTIONARY GENETICS; POSITIVE SELECTION; MARKERS; IDENTIFICATION; HOMOZYGOSITY; MANAGEMENT; DATABASE;
D O I
10.1186/s12711-023-00866-3
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
BackgroundEffective conservation and utilization of farm animals are fundamental for realizing sustainable increases in food production. In situ and ex situ conservation are the two main strategies that are currently used to protect the genetic integrity of Chinese domestic chicken breeds. However, genomic diversity and population structure have not been compared in these conserved populations.ResultsThree hundred and sixty-one individuals from three Chinese domestic chicken breeds were collected from populations conserved in situ and ex situ and genotyped using genotyping-by-sequencing (GBS). First, we used different parameters based on heterozygosity, genomic inbreeding, and linkage disequilibrium to estimate the genomic diversity of these populations, and applied principal component analysis (PCA), neighbor-joining tree, and ADMIXTURE to analyze population structure. We found that the small ex situ conserved populations, which have been maintained in controlled environments, retained less genetic diversity than the in situ conserved populations. In addition, genetic differentiation was detected between the in situ and ex situ conserved populations of the same breed. Next, we analyzed signatures of selection using three statistical methods (fixation index (FST), nucleotide diversity (Pi), and cross-population extended haplotype homozygosity (XP-EHH) to study the genetic footprints that underlie the differentiation between in situ and ex situ conserved populations. We concluded that, in these small populations, differentiation might be caused by genetic drift or by mutations from the original populations. The differentiation observed in the population of Beijing You chicken probably reflects adaptation to environmental changes in temperature and humidity that the animals faced when they were moved from their place of origin to the new site for ex situ conservation.ConclusionsConservation programs of three Chinese domestic chicken breeds have maintained their genomic diversity to a sustainable degree. The small ex situ conserved populations, which are maintained in controlled environments, retain less genetic diversity than populations conserved in situ. In addition, the transfer of populations from their place of origin to another site for conservation purposes results in genetic differentiation, which may be caused by genetic drift or adaptation. This study provides a basis for further optimization of in situ and ex situ conservation programs for domestic chicken breeds in China.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Global genomic diversity and conservation priorities for domestic animals are associated with the economies of their regions of origin
    Zhang, Min
    Peng, Wei-Feng
    Hu, Xiao-Ju
    Zhao, Yong-Xin
    Lv, Feng-Hua
    Yang, Ji
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2018, 8
  • [2] Marginal diversity analysis of conservation of Chinese domestic duck breeds
    Zhang, Yang
    Wang, Laidi
    Bian, Youqing
    Wang, Zhaoshan
    Xu, Qi
    Chang, Guobin
    Chen, Guohong
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2019, 9 (1)
  • [3] Genomic Tools for Effective Conservation of Livestock Breed Diversity
    Eusebi, Paulina G.
    Martinez, Amparo
    Cortes, Oscar
    DIVERSITY-BASEL, 2020, 12 (01):
  • [4] Organization and Management of Conservation Programs and Research in Domestic Animal Genetic Resources
    Delgado Bermejo, Juan Vicente
    Martinez Martinez, Maria Amparo
    Rodriguez Galvan, Guadalupe
    Stemmer, Angelika
    Navas Gonzalez, Francisco Javier
    Camacho Vallejo, Maria Esperanza
    DIVERSITY-BASEL, 2019, 11 (12): : 1 - 19
  • [5] Conservation genomic analysis of domestic and wild pig populations from the Iberian Peninsula
    Manuel Herrero-Medrano, Juan
    Megens, Hendrik-Jan
    Groenen, Martien A. M.
    Ramis, Guillermo
    Bosse, Mirte
    Perez-Enciso, Miguel
    Crooijmans, Richard P. M. A.
    BMC GENETICS, 2013, 14
  • [6] Origin and genetic diversity of Chinese domestic ducks
    Li, Hui-Fang
    Zhu, Wen-Qi
    Song, Wei-Tao
    Shu, Jing-Ting
    Han, Wei
    Chen, Kuan-Wei
    MOLECULAR PHYLOGENETICS AND EVOLUTION, 2010, 57 (02) : 634 - 640
  • [7] Genomic insights into local adaptation and phenotypic diversity of Wenchang chickens
    Gu, Li-Hong
    Wu, Ran -Ran
    Zheng, Xin-Li
    Fu, An
    Xing, Zeng-Yang
    Chen, Yi-Yong
    He, Zhong-Chun
    Lu, Li-Zhi
    Qi, Yan-Tao
    Chen, An-Hong
    Zhang, Ya-Ping
    Xu, Tie-Shan
    Peng, Min-Sheng
    Ma, Cheng
    POULTRY SCIENCE, 2024, 103 (03)
  • [8] The use of genomic information can enhance the efficiency of conservation programs
    Fernandez, J.
    Toro, M. A.
    Gomez-Romano, F.
    Villanueva, B.
    ANIMAL FRONTIERS, 2016, 6 (01) : 59 - 64
  • [9] Genomic investigation of the Chinese alligator reveals wild-extinct genetic diversity and genomic consequences of their continuous decline
    Yang, Shangchen
    Lan, Tianming
    Zhang, Yi
    Wang, Qing
    Li, Haimeng
    Dussex, Nicolas
    Sahu, Sunil Kumar
    Shi, Minhui
    Hu, Mengyuan
    Zhu, Yixin
    Cao, Jun
    Liu, Lirong
    Lin, Jianqing
    Wan, Qiu-Hong
    Liu, Huan
    Fang, Sheng-Guo
    MOLECULAR ECOLOGY RESOURCES, 2023, 23 (01) : 294 - 311
  • [10] Using genomic tools to maintain diversity and fitness in conservation programmes
    Rodriguez de Cara, Maria Angeles
    Villanueva, Beatriz
    Angel Toro, Miguel
    Fernandez, Jesus
    MOLECULAR ECOLOGY, 2013, 22 (24) : 6091 - 6099