A Cross-Sectional Study of Graduate Medical Education in Radiological Fellowships using Accessible Content

被引:0
作者
Singh, Som P. [1 ,3 ]
Ramprasad, Aarya [1 ]
Qureshi, Fahad M. [1 ]
Baig, Farhan A. [1 ]
Qureshi, Fawad [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Missouri Kansas City, Sch Med, Kansas City, MO USA
[2] Mayo Clin Alix Sch Med, Rochester, MN USA
[3] Univ Missouri Kansas City, Sch Med, 2411 Holmes St, Kansas City, MO 64108 USA
关键词
DOXIMITY RESIDENCY RANKINGS; WEBSITE CONTENT; DIAGNOSTIC-RADIOLOGY; WEB SITES; PROGRAMS; COVID-19; TWITTER;
D O I
10.1067/j.cpradiol.2023.05.001
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Graduate medical education in radiology serves an imperative role in training the next generation of specialists. Given the regularity of virtual interviews, the website of a fellowship programs remains a critical first-line source of information of applicants. The aim of this study is to systematically evaluate 7 radiology fellowship programs utilizing a systematic process. A cross-sectional descriptive 286 graduate medical education fellowship programs in radiology were screened from the Fellowship and Residency Electronic Interactive Database (FREIDA). Extracted data was evaluated for comprehensiveness using 20 content criteria, and a readability score is calculated. The mean comprehensiveness among all fellowship program websites was 55.8% (n = 286), and the average FRE among the program overview sections was 11.9 (n = 214). ANOVA revealed no statistical significance in program website comprehensiveness between radiology fellowships (P = 0.33). The quality of a program's website data continues to serve an important role in an applicant's decision-making. Fellowship programs have improved in their content availability overtime, but content reevaluation needs to be continued for tangible improvement. (c) 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:528 / 533
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
[21]   Analysis of musculoskeletal radiology fellowship websites [J].
Lee, David J. ;
Jung, Jin ;
Daniels, Alan H. ;
Eltorai, Adam E. M. .
SKELETAL RADIOLOGY, 2020, 49 (07) :1149-1153
[22]   Assessment of US Radiology Residency Program Websites in the COVID-19 Era [J].
Liu, David S. ;
Abu-Shaban, Kamil ;
Sugito, Harun R. ;
Kulkarni, Vishnutheertha ;
Kikyo, Fumitaka ;
Gupta, Yasha ;
Elsamaloty, Haitham .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF RADIOLOGY, 2022, 19 (10) :1170-1176
[23]   Radiology Without Borders: Identifying Global Reach of Radiology Social Media in Africa [J].
Lugo-Fagundo, Elias ;
Weisberg, Edmund M. ;
Kauffman, Lilly ;
Fishman, Elliot K. .
CURRENT PROBLEMS IN DIAGNOSTIC RADIOLOGY, 2022, 51 (06) :852-857
[24]   IMPORTANCE OF RESIDENCY PROGRAM WEB SITES TO EMERGENCY MEDICINE APPLICANTS [J].
Mahler, Simon A. ;
Wagner, Mary-Jo ;
Church, Amy ;
Sokolosky, Mitchell ;
Cline, David M. .
JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2009, 36 (01) :83-88
[25]   Readability of radiology reports: implications for patient-centered care [J].
Martin-Carreras, Teresa ;
Cook, Tessa S. ;
Kahn, Charles E., Jr. .
CLINICAL IMAGING, 2019, 54 :116-120
[26]   Utilization of Social Media Platforms in Diagnostic Radiology Residency Programs in the United States [J].
Murugesan, Arun ;
Patel, Sahil ;
Bhargava, Puneet ;
Cooke, Erin A. .
CURRENT PROBLEMS IN DIAGNOSTIC RADIOLOGY, 2023, 52 (01) :41-44
[27]   Analysis of Hematology and Oncology Fellowship Website Content and Diversity Representation [J].
Muthiah, Arun ;
Aggarwal, Vanya ;
Muthiah, Chandrasekar ;
Wei, Chapman ;
Ollila, Thomas ;
Quesenberry, Matthew, I ;
Dizon, Don S. .
JCO ONCOLOGY PRACTICE, 2022, 18 (04) :298-+
[28]   Advertise Right by Addressing the Concerns: An Evaluation of Women's/Breast Imaging Radiology Fellowship Website Content for Prospective Fellows [J].
Nasir, Muhammad Umer ;
Murray, Nicolas ;
Mathur, Shobhit ;
Niu, Bonnie ;
Lin, Jasmine ;
Ning, Cher ;
Jhamb, Ritisha ;
Khosa, Faisal .
CURRENT PROBLEMS IN DIAGNOSTIC RADIOLOGY, 2021, 50 (04) :481-484
[29]  
ncbi, An evaluation of the content of Canadian and American nuclear medicine fellowship websites
[30]  
ncbi, Should radiology residency interviews remain virtual? Results of a multi-institutional survey inform the debate