Comfortability Analysis Under a Human-Robot Interaction Perspective

被引:5
作者
Redondo, Maria Elena Lechuga [1 ]
Niewiadomski, Radoslaw [2 ]
Rea, Francesco [1 ]
Incao, Sara [1 ]
Sandini, Giulio [1 ]
Sciutti, Alessandra [1 ]
机构
[1] Italian Inst Technol, Genoa, Italy
[2] Univ Genoa, DIBRIS, Genoa, Italy
基金
欧洲研究理事会;
关键词
Comfortability; Human-robot interaction; Social errors; Affective computing;
D O I
10.1007/s12369-023-01026-9
中图分类号
TP24 [机器人技术];
学科分类号
080202 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Interactions entail a tangled mix of emotional states that emerge between the people who are communicating. Being capable of comprehending these states help us to adapt to our partner's needs enhancing the interaction. In the same fashion, we believe that robots capable of such skills would be better integrated in society. Hence, this paper tackles the internal state that focuses on the unfolding of any social exchange: Comfortability. It explores whether a humanoid robot can have an impact on humans Comfortability and explores the way people might behave. To this aim, the iCub robot interviewed 29 non-HRI researchers for a real column of the IIT Opentalk online magazine. During the interview the robot complimented, ignored, interrupted, and insulted the participant with the intention of making them feel opposite Comfortability levels. The results concluded that a humanoid robot can affect people's Comfortability highlighting that not everyone perceives, assimilates, and reacts to the same situations in the same way. The findings suggest that self-reports and Valence/Arousal estimations are not reliable measures to determine someone's Comfortability and that external factors (e.g., attitude towards robots or the robot's perception) might affect it. On top of that, a list of 28 visual features associated with low Comfortability levels is included, providing support to keep unraveling Comfortability in further studies.
引用
收藏
页码:77 / 103
页数:27
相关论文
共 47 条
[31]  
Packard C, 2019, ACMIEEE INT CONF HUM, P524, DOI [10.1109/hri.2019.8673101, 10.1109/HRI.2019.8673101]
[32]   Affective computing: challenges [J].
Picard, RW .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HUMAN-COMPUTER STUDIES, 2003, 59 (1-2) :55-64
[33]   The Effects of Humanlike and Robot-Specific Affective Nonverbal Behavior on Perception, Emotion, and Behavior [J].
Puetten, Astrid M. Rosenthal-von der ;
Kraemer, Nicole C. ;
Herrmann, Jonathan .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SOCIAL ROBOTICS, 2018, 10 (05) :569-582
[34]  
Ragni M, 2016, IEEE ROMAN, P501, DOI 10.1109/ROMAN.2016.7745164
[35]   Can Robots Elicit Different Comfortability Levels? [J].
Redondo, Maria Elena Lechuga ;
Vignolo, Alessia ;
Niewiadomski, Radoslaw ;
Rea, Francesco ;
Sciutti, Alessandra .
SOCIAL ROBOTICS, ICSR 2020, 2020, 12483 :664-675
[36]  
Redondo MEL, 2019, 2019 8TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON AFFECTIVE COMPUTING AND INTELLIGENT INTERACTION WORKSHOPS AND DEMOS (ACIIW), P35, DOI [10.1109/aciiw.2019.8925017, 10.1109/ACIIW.2019.8925017]
[37]  
Ross R., 2004, AAMAS '04, P1424, DOI 10.1109/AAMAS.2004.103
[38]   Trust, Acceptance and Social Cues in Human-Robot Interaction (SCRITA) [J].
Rossi, Alessandra ;
Holthaus, Patrick ;
Perugia, Giulia ;
Moros, Silvia ;
Marcus Scheunemann .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SOCIAL ROBOTICS, 2021, 13 (08) :1833-1834
[39]   To Err is Human(-like): Effects of Robot Gesture on Perceived Anthropomorphism and Likability [J].
Salem, Maha ;
Eyssel, Friederike ;
Rohlfing, Katharina ;
Kopp, Stefan ;
Joublin, Frank .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SOCIAL ROBOTICS, 2013, 5 (03) :313-323
[40]  
Scheff T.J., 1990, Research Agendas in the Sociology of Emotions, P281