Simultaneous adjustment of uncontrolled confounding, selection bias and misclassification in multiple-bias modelling

被引:6
作者
Brendel, Paul [1 ,2 ,6 ]
Torres, Aracelis [3 ]
Arah, Onyebuchi A. [1 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] UCLA, Fielding Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol, Los Angeles, CA USA
[2] Valo Hlth, Boston, MA USA
[3] Verana Hlth, San Francisco, CA USA
[4] UCLA, Coll Letters & Sci, Dept Stat, Los Angeles, CA USA
[5] Aarhus Univ, Dept Publ Hlth, Sect Epidemiol, Aarhus, Denmark
[6] Valo Hlth, 399 Boylston St,Suite 505, Boston, MA 02116 USA
关键词
Multi-bias modelling; confounding; information bias; selection bias; parameters; imputed; regression weight; mis-specification; simulation; REAL-WORLD EVIDENCE; SENSITIVITY-ANALYSIS; CAUSAL DIAGRAMS; FORMULAS;
D O I
10.1093/ije/dyad001
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background Adjusting for multiple biases usually involves adjusting for one bias at a time, with careful attention to the order in which these biases are adjusted. A novel, alternative approach to multiple-bias adjustment involves the simultaneous adjustment of all biases via imputation and/or regression weighting. The imputed value or weight corresponds to the probability of the missing data and serves to 'reconstruct' the unbiased data that would be observed based on the provided assumptions of the degree of bias. Methods We motivate and describe the steps necessary to implement this method. We also demonstrate the validity of this method through a simulation study with an exposure-outcome relationship that is biased by uncontrolled confounding, exposure misclassification, and selection bias. Results The study revealed that a non-biased effect estimate can be obtained when correct bias parameters are applied. It also found that incorrect specification of every bias parameter by +/-25% still produced an effect estimate with less bias than the observed, biased effect. Conclusions Simultaneous multi-bias analysis is a useful way of investigating and understanding how multiple sources of bias may affect naive effect estimates. This new method can be used to enhance the validity and transparency of real-world evidence obtained from observational, longitudinal studies.
引用
收藏
页码:1220 / 1230
页数:11
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]   Bias formulas for external adjustment and sensitivity analysis of unmeasured confounders [J].
Arah, Onyebuchi A. ;
Chiba, Yasutaka ;
Greenland, Sander .
ANNALS OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2008, 18 (08) :637-646
[2]   Bias Analysis for Uncontrolled Confounding in the Health Sciences [J].
Arah, Onyebuchi A. .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF PUBLIC HEALTH, VOL 38, 2017, 38 :23-38
[3]   Quantitative bias analysis for study and grant planning [J].
Fox, Matthew P. ;
Lash, Timothy L. .
ANNALS OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2020, 43 :32-36
[4]   On the Need for Quantitative Bias Analysis in the Peer-Review Process [J].
Fox, Matthew P. ;
Lash, Timothy L. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2017, 185 (10) :865-868
[5]   A method to automate probabilistic sensitivity analyses of misclassified binary variables [J].
Fox, MP ;
Lash, TL ;
Greenland, S .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2005, 34 (06) :1370-1376
[6]   CONFOUNDING AND MISCLASSIFICATION [J].
GREENLAND, S ;
ROBINS, JM .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1985, 122 (03) :495-506
[7]   Quantifying biases in causal models:: Classical confounding vs collider-stratification bias [J].
Greenland, S .
EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2003, 14 (03) :300-306
[8]   Basic methods for sensitivity analysis of biases [J].
Greenland, S .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1996, 25 (06) :1107-1116
[9]   Causal diagrams for epidemiologic research [J].
Greenland, S ;
Pearl, J ;
Robins, JM .
EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1999, 10 (01) :37-48
[10]   Sensitivity analysis, Monte Carlo risk analysis, and Bayesian uncertainty assessment [J].
Greenland, S .
RISK ANALYSIS, 2001, 21 (04) :579-583