Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) with and without plating: A comparison of radiological and clinical outcomes

被引:4
作者
Bebenek, Adam [1 ]
Godlewski, Bartosz [1 ]
机构
[1] St Raphael Hosp, Spinal Surg Ward Scanmed, Dept Orthopaed & Traumatol, Krakow, Poland
来源
ADVANCES IN CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE | 2024年 / 33卷 / 08期
关键词
anterior cervical discectomy and fusion; standalone cervical cages; cervical plates; self-anchoring cervical cages; ACDF outcomes; ADJACENT SEGMENT DISEASE; PROFILE ANCHORED SPACER; ALONE INTERBODY CAGE; ZERO-P SPACER; RADIOGRAPHIC FUSION; PEEK CAGE; FOLLOW-UP; FIXATION; 2-LEVEL; CONSTRUCT;
D O I
10.17219/acem/172062
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Treatment for degenerative disc disease of the cervical spine primarily aims to decompress neural structures and preserve the former height of the disc space and foramina. Popular methods include anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) using cages with plates or without plates (standalone cages). However, it is still debatable whether a plate is necessary for enhanced treatment outcomes. This paper reviews current literature reports, adding insights from the authors' experience. A literature search was performed with keywords related to ACDF with or without cervical plating. We analyzed the titles and abstracts to identify all potentially relevant studies. Out of these, a total of 28 original research and 5 systematic reviews/meta-analyses met our inclusion criteria. The success of surgery for cervical disc disease depends fundamentally on the appropriate decompression of neural structures. This is the main determinant of postoperative clinical improvement measured according to scales capturing changes in pain intensity and quality of life. An ideal replacement for natural components of the human body does not exist, even though more and more refined solutions are developed every year. A comparison of treatment outcomes using non -plated (standalone) cages and cage + plate systems requires separate analysis of radiological and clinical outcomes. Both methods have their advantages and disadvantages. Radiological outcomes are slightly better with cage + plate systems, and clinical outcomes are comparable.
引用
收藏
页码:881 / 888
页数:8
相关论文
共 60 条
  • [1] Ahn SS, 2016, WORLD NEUROSURG, V89, P42, DOI [10.1016/J.WNEU.2016.01.013, 10.1016/j.wneu.2016.01.013]
  • [2] Adjacent Segment Disease After Cervical Spine Fusion Evaluation of a 70 Patient Long-Term Follow-Up
    Alhashash, Mohamed
    Shousha, Mootaz
    Boehm, Heinrich
    [J]. SPINE, 2018, 43 (09) : 605 - 609
  • [3] ROBINSON ANTERIOR CERVICAL DISKECTOMY AND ARTHRODESIS FOR CERVICAL RADICULOPATHY - LONG-TERM FOLLOW-UP OF 100 AND 22 PATIENTS
    BOHLMAN, HH
    EMERY, SE
    GOODFELLOW, DB
    JONES, PK
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 1993, 75A (09) : 1298 - 1307
  • [4] Comparison of Curvature Between the Zero-P Spacer and Traditional Cage and Plate After 3-Level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Mid-term Results
    Chen, Yuanyuan
    Liu, Yang
    Chen, Huajiang
    Cao, Peng
    Yuan, Wen
    [J]. CLINICAL SPINE SURGERY, 2017, 30 (08): : E1111 - E1116
  • [5] Anterior cervical interbody fusion with the Zero-P spacer: mid-term results of two-level fusion
    Chen, Yuanyuan
    Chen, Huajing
    Cao, Peng
    Yuan, Wen
    [J]. EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2015, 24 (08) : 1666 - 1672
  • [6] A comparison of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) using self-locking stand-alone polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cage with ACDF using cage and plate in the treatment of three-level cervical degenerative spondylopathy: a retrospective study with 2-year follow-up
    Chen, Yuqiao
    Lu, Guohua
    Wang, Bing
    Li, Lei
    Kuang, Lei
    [J]. EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2016, 25 (07) : 2255 - 2262
  • [7] Comparison of Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion With a Stand-Alone Interbody Cage Versus a Conventional Cage-Plate Technique: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Cheung, Zoe B.
    Gidumal, Sunder
    White, Samuel
    Shin, John
    Phan, Kevin
    Osman, Nebiyu
    Bronheim, Rachel
    Vargas, Luilly
    Kim, Jun S.
    Cho, Samuel K.
    [J]. GLOBAL SPINE JOURNAL, 2019, 9 (04) : 446 - 455
  • [8] Chung C., 2012, Spine Journal, V12, p100S, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.SPINEE.2012.08.277
  • [9] The biomechanical stability of a novel spacer with integrated plate in contiguous two-level and three-level ACDF models: an in vitro cadaveric study
    Clavenna, Andrew L.
    Beutler, William J.
    Gudipally, Manasa
    Moldavsky, Mark
    Khalil, Saif
    [J]. SPINE JOURNAL, 2012, 12 (02) : 157 - 163
  • [10] Connolly PJ, 1996, J SPINAL DISORD, V9, P202