Multi-scale assessment of global warming mitigation potential of anaerobic digestion for food waste management in the United States: A comparison of Life Cycle Assessment approaches

被引:5
作者
Karaiskakis, Alexandros N. [1 ]
Hernandez, Borja [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Ierapetritou, Marianthi [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Bioenergy Devco, Innovat & Sustainabil Dept, Annapolis, MD USA
[2] Univ Delaware, Dept Chem & Biomol Engn, Newark, DE 19716 USA
[3] Univ Delaware, Delaware Energy Inst, Newark, DE 19716 USA
[4] Univ Navarra, TECNUN Engn Sch, Sci & Biomed Engn Dept, Manuel Lardizabal Ibibildea 13, San Sebastian 20018, Spain
关键词
Anaerobic digestion; Carbon intensity; Biogas; Greenhouse gases; Policymaking; GHG mitigation; Holistic assessment; Food waste management; Scope; 4; emissions; Geospatial considerations; HYDROGEN-PRODUCTION; ENERGY; EFFICIENCY;
D O I
10.1016/j.resconrec.2024.107442
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This study provides a holistic Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) for evaluating the decarbonization potential of using Anaerobic Digestion (AD) in food waste treatment. The LCA is based on the development of a new flexible tool that allows the integration of the LCA at the process level with geospatial data and therefore includes a wide range of factors such as multiple feedstocks, technologies for end -use applications, and facility locations. This tool estimates a potential for reducing 21.8 MMtons CO2eq/y (345 gCO2eq/kgwaste) and generating 161 TBTU/y of renewable natural gas for the whole United States by managing food waste based on waste-hierarchy. This study also identifies those states with a more efficient AD implementation potential regarding CO2eq avoidance. It highlights the importance of including region-specific conditions since feedstock diversion depends on the state and is the main contributor to the decarbonization potential, up to 60 % of the avoided emissions.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 57 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2019, Inventory of U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Sinks
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2022, Sustainable Materials Management Basics
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2021, International Efforts on Wasted Food Recovery
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2019, Waste-to-Energy from Municipal Solids Wastes
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2020, Food: Material-Specific Data | US EPA
  • [6] Biogas-to-biomethane upgrading: A comparative review and assessment in a life cycle perspective
    Ardolino, F.
    Cardamone, G. F.
    Parrillo, F.
    Arena, U.
    [J]. RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2021, 139
  • [7] Hydrogen production by biogas steam reforming: A technical, economic and ecological analysis
    Braga, Lucia Bollini
    Silveira, Jose Luz
    da Silva, Marcio Evaristo
    Tuna, Celso Eduardo
    Machin, Einara Blanco
    Pedroso, Daniel Travieso
    [J]. RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2013, 28 : 166 - 173
  • [8] Bioenergy Potential from Food Waste in California
    Breunig, Hanna M.
    Jin, Ling
    Robinson, Alastair
    Scown, Corinne D.
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2017, 51 (03) : 1120 - 1128
  • [9] Caiardi F., 2021, Chem. Eng. Trans., V86, P709, DOI [10.3303/CET2186119, DOI 10.3303/CET2186119]
  • [10] California Air Resources Board, 2022, Low Carbon Fuel Standard