Biological performance of a novel bovine hydroxyapatite in a guided bone regeneration model: A preclinical study in a mandibular defect in dogs

被引:0
|
作者
De Carvalho, Bruno [1 ]
Dory, Emilie [2 ]
Trus, Caroline [2 ]
Pirson, Justine [2 ]
Germain, Loic [2 ]
Lecloux, Geoffrey [1 ]
Lambert, France [1 ]
Rompen, Eric [2 ]
机构
[1] Dent Biomat Res Unit, Dept Periodontol Orodent & Implant Surg, Ave Hop 1, B-4000 Liege, Belgium
[2] Wishbone SA, Liege, Belgium
关键词
biomaterials; bone regeneration; hydroxyapatite; osteoconduction; AUTOGENOUS BONE; EXTRACTION SOCKETS; ALVEOLAR RIDGE; IN-VIVO; AUGMENTATION; SUBSTITUTES; MEMBRANES; RECONSTRUCTION; BIOMATERIALS; STRENGTH;
D O I
10.1111/cid.13260
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Objectives: This preclinical model study aims to evaluate the performance and safety of a novel hydroxyapatite biomaterial (Wishbone Hydroxyapatite, WHA) on guided bone regeneration compared to a commercially available deproteinized bovine bone mineral (Bio-Oss, BO).Material and Methods: Twenty-four beagle dogs were allocated to three timepoint cohorts (4, 12, and 26 weeks) of eight animals each. In all animals, four critical-sized, independent wall mandibular defects were created (32 defects/cohort). Each animal received all four treatments, allocated randomly to separated defects: WHA + collagen membrane (M), BO + M, no treatment (Sham, Sh), and Sh + M. At each timepoint, the specimens were harvested for histologic and histomorphometric analyses to determine the newly formed bone and osteoconductivity.Results: At 4 weeks, bone regeneration was significantly higher for WHA + M (46.8%) when compared to BO + M (21.4%), Sh (15.1%), and Sh + M (23.1%) (p < 0.05); at 12 and 26 weeks, regeneration was similar for WHA and BO. Bone-to-material contact increased over time similarly for WHA + M and BO + M. From a safety point of view, inflammation attributed to WHA + M or BO + M was minimal; necrosis or fatty infiltrate was absent.Conclusions: WHA + M resulted in higher bone regeneration rate than BO + M at 4 weeks. Both BO + M and WHA + M were more efficient than both Sh groups at all timepoints. Safety and biocompatibility of WHA was favorable and comparable to that of BO.
引用
收藏
页码:183 / 196
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Biological evaluation of critical bone defect regeneration using hydroxyapatite/ alginate composite granules
    Ribeiro, Iorrana indira dos Anjos
    Almeida, Renata dos Santos
    da Silva, Ana Maria Guerreiro Braga
    Barbosa, Aryon de Almeida
    Rossi, Alexandre Malta
    Miguel, Fulvio Borges
    Rosa, Fabiana Paim
    ACTA CIRURGICA BRASILEIRA, 2024, 39
  • [22] Comparison between two antimicrobial protocols with or without guided bone regeneration in the treatment of peri-implantitis. A histomorphometric study in dogs
    Ramos, Umberto Demoner
    Suaid, Flavia Adelino
    Wikesjo, Ulf M. E.
    Susin, Cristiano
    Taba, Mario, Jr.
    Novaes, Arthur Belem, Jr.
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2017, 28 (11) : 1388 - 1395
  • [23] Zoledronate loaded polylactic acid/polycaprolactone/hydroxyapatite scaffold accelerates regeneration and led to enhance structural performance and functional ability of the radial bone defect in rat
    Oryan, A.
    Hassanajili, S.
    Sahvieh, S.
    IRANIAN JOURNAL OF VETERINARY RESEARCH, 2023, 24 (02) : 122 - 135
  • [24] Progression of experimental peri-implantitis in guided bone regeneration and pristine bone: A preclinical in vivo study
    Ko, Young-Chang
    Lee, Jungwon
    Lee, Dongseob
    Seol, Yang-Jo
    Koo, Ki-Tae
    Lee, Yong-Moo
    JOURNAL OF PERIODONTOLOGY, 2023, 94 (08) : 1032 - 1044
  • [25] Human Bone Marrow Mesenchymal Stromal Cells Promote Bone Regeneration in a Xenogeneic Rabbit Model: A Preclinical Study
    Francisco Blanco, Juan
    Garcia-Brinon, Jesus
    Benito-Garzon, Lorena
    Pescador, David
    Muntion, Sandra
    Sanchez-Guijo, Fermin
    STEM CELLS INTERNATIONAL, 2018, 2018
  • [26] High loads of nano-hydroxyapatite/graphene nanoribbon composites guided bone regeneration using an osteoporotic animal model
    Oliveira, Francilio Carvalho
    Carvalho, Jancineide Oliveira
    Soares Gusmao, Suziete Batista
    Goncalves, Licia de Sousa
    Soares Mendes, Liana Martha
    Pereira Freitas, Sergio Antonio
    de Meira Gusmao, Gustavo Oliveira
    Viana, Bartolomeu Cruz
    Marciano, Fernanda Roberta
    Lobo, Anderson Oliveira
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NANOMEDICINE, 2019, 14 : 865 - 874
  • [27] Novel cellulose/hydroxyapatite scaffolds for bone tissue regeneration: In vitro and in vivo study
    Daugela, Povilas
    Pranskunas, Mindaugas
    Juodzbalys, Gintaras
    Liesiene, Jolanta
    Baniukaitiene, Odeta
    Afonso, Americo
    Gomes, Pedro Sousa
    JOURNAL OF TISSUE ENGINEERING AND REGENERATIVE MEDICINE, 2018, 12 (05) : 1195 - 1208
  • [28] A Mini-Pig Mandibular Defect Model for Evaluation of Craniomaxillofacial Bone Regeneration
    Van Oirschot, Bart A. J. A.
    Geven, Edwin J. W.
    Mikos, Antonios G.
    Van den Beucken, Jeroen J. J. P.
    Jansen, John A.
    TISSUE ENGINEERING PART C-METHODS, 2022, 28 (05) : 193 - 201
  • [29] Effects of the bilayer nano-hydroxyapatite/mineralized collagen-guided bone regeneration membrane on site preservation in dogs
    Sun, Yi
    Wang, Chengyue
    Chen, Qixin
    Liu, Hai
    Deng, Chao
    Ling, Peixue
    Cui, Fu-Zhai
    JOURNAL OF BIOMATERIALS APPLICATIONS, 2017, 32 (02) : 242 - 256
  • [30] New nano-hydroxyapatite in bone defect regeneration: A histological study in rats
    Kubasiewicz-Ross, Pawel
    Hadzik, Jakub
    Seeliger, Julia
    Kozak, Karol
    Jurczyszyn, Kamil
    Gerber, Hanna
    Dominiak, Marzena
    Kunert-Keil, Christiane
    ANNALS OF ANATOMY-ANATOMISCHER ANZEIGER, 2017, 213 : 83 - 90