How to Avoid Errors When Using Navigation to Place Implants-A Narrative Review

被引:4
作者
Block, Michael S. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] LSU Sch Dent, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, Metairie, LA USA
[2] Ctr Dent Reconstruct, OMS 110,Vet Mem Blvd Metairie, Metairie, LA 70005 USA
关键词
BEAM COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY; GUIDED SURGERY; DYNAMIC NAVIGATION; ACCURACY; BONE; COMPLICATIONS; MULTISLICE; TEMPLATES; SYSTEM; TEETH;
D O I
10.1016/j.joms.2022.11.003
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Purpose: Surgeons placing implants use navigation for implant placement accuracy. The importance of this review is to document the sources of error that are involved with navigation so surgeons can recognize factors to decrease error. The objective is to provide surgeons with a reference to optimize navigation.Methods: Pubmed.gov was the information source. Years reviewed included 2010 to 2022. The inclu-sion criteria included only articles in peer-reviewed journals. In vitro results were included only if they involved testing of variables microgap, cone beam computerized tomography (CBCT) accuracy evaluation, or accuracy of printed models. Variables were searched and evaluated. Data collected included the objec-tives and outcomes of the study including statistical significance. The conclusions made by the authors were confirmed by evaluating the data analysis, and then these conclusions were listed in each error -related topic.Results: The search used terms which included guided implant surgery complications (n = 4,029), accuracy of CBCT scanners (n = 319), accuracy of implant navigation (n = 983), and the error between drills and static guides (n = 3). From this search, 70 articles were collated that satisfied the inclusion criteria. There are multiple sources of error that are less than 1 mm, including but not limited to errors associated with the scanner and method for scanning, errors associated with merging scanned files with the CBCT scan, errors using different guide stent fabrication methods, errors associated with intra-operative techniques, the learning curve, and planning error. If small errors are not taken into consider-ation, implant placement errors can exceed 1-2 mm of platform location and angulation errors in excess of 8 degrees.Conclusion: The surgeon needs to take into consideration controllable factors that will result in the avoidance of implant malposition and thus be able to effectively utilize navigation for accurate implant placement.
引用
收藏
页码:299 / 307
页数:9
相关论文
共 4 条
  • [1] Patient Specific Instruments and Patient Individual Implants-A Narrative Review
    Benignus, Christian
    Buschner, Peter
    Meier, Malin Kristin
    Wilken, Frauke
    Rieger, Johannes
    Beckmann, Johannes
    JOURNAL OF PERSONALIZED MEDICINE, 2023, 13 (03):
  • [2] How Do Robotics and Navigation Facilitate Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery? A Case Series and Narrative Review
    Quiceno, Esteban
    Soliman, Mohamed A. R.
    Khan, Asham
    Mullin, Jeffrey P.
    Pollina, John
    NEUROSURGERY, 2025, 96 (3S) : S84 - S93
  • [3] "When," "Where," and "How" of SARS-CoV-2 Infection Affects the Human Cardiovascular System: A Narrative Review
    Kounis, Nicholas G.
    Gogos, Christos
    de Gregorio, Cesare
    Hung, Ming-Yow
    Kounis, Sophia N.
    Tsounis, Efthymios P.
    Assimakopoulos, Stelios F.
    Pourmasumi, Soheila
    Mplani, Virginia
    Servos, George
    Dousdampanis, Periklis
    Plotas, Panagiotis
    Michalaki, Marina A.
    Tsigkas, Grigorios
    Grammatikopoulos, Gerasimos
    Velissaris, Dimitrios
    Koniar, Ioanna
    BALKAN MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2024, 41 (01) : 7 - 22
  • [4] Robotic bronchoscopy for diagnosis of lung nodules using the Ion system: a narrative review of the technical aspects and advantages over standard flexible bronchoscopy with electromagnetic navigation
    Ghosh, Sohini
    Patel, Samir
    JOURNAL OF VISUALIZED SURGERY, 2023, 9