An evaluation of the feasibility of implementing the BeWEL lifestyle intervention programme for people at increased risk of colorectal cancer - from research to real life

被引:0
作者
Anderson, Annie S. [1 ,4 ]
Donaghy, Claire [2 ]
Lamb, Ross [2 ]
Steele, Robert J. C. [1 ]
Moug, Susan [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Dundee, Ninewells Hosp & Med Sch, Div Populat Hlth & Genom, Dundee, Scotland
[2] Bowel Canc UK, Edinburgh, Scotland
[3] Royal Alexandra Hosp, Dept Surg, Paisley, Scotland
[4] Univ Dundee, Ninewells Hosp Med Sch, Div Populat Hlth & Genom, Dundee DD1 9SY, Scotland
关键词
adenoma; behaviour change; bowel cancer; clinical practice; disease; therapeutic areas; lifestyle intervention; ASSOCIATION; ADENOMA; OBESITY;
D O I
10.1111/jhn.13117
中图分类号
R15 [营养卫生、食品卫生]; TS201 [基础科学];
学科分类号
100403 ;
摘要
BackgroundThe BeWEL randomised controlled trial (RCT) of weight loss in people with colorectal adenomas demonstrated that a significant proportion of people are interested in lifestyle interventions (49%) and clinically relevant changes in body weight were achieved at 12-month follow-up. The current work aimed to assess the feasibility of the BeWEL programme invitation and delivery in a nonresearch setting to assess whether the original results could be replicated. MethodsThe original BeWel programme was modified through the provision of verbal introductions (vs. letter), requirement for people to contact BeWEL team (vs. BeWEL team contacting them), community delivery (vs. home), duration (12 weeks vs. 12 months) and two intervention visits (vs. 3) and inclusion of people with predisposition to colorectal cancer. Eligible people were informed about the BeWel programme from National Health Service (NHS) staff after colonoscopy procedures and invited to contact a dedicated Bowel Cancer UK lifestyle team. ResultsFindings demonstrated that programme uptake (10.6% vs. 33%) and retention (71% vs. 93%) was significantly lower than that obtained from the BeWEL RCT. For people who participated in the 3-month programme (n = 21), self-reported weight loss (mean: -7% body weight) was successful, and the programme was well received. ConclusionsThe current approach to engaging clients with the BeWEL programme is unsustainable. Reliance on busy NHS staff to deliver invitations and the need for people to contact the delivery team (due to data protection) may have impacted on uptake. Alternative approaches to supporting weight management in this population should be explored further.
引用
收藏
页码:540 / 553
页数:14
相关论文
共 32 条
  • [1] A qualitative evaluation of the impact of a training programme on colorectal cancer risk reduction for Specialist Screening Practitioners on health promotion, knowledge and practice
    Anderson, Annie
    Barnett, Karen
    Bhagat, Meena
    Steele, Robert
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER CARE, 2021, 30 (01)
  • [2] A novel approach to increasing community capacity for weight management a volunteer-delivered programme (ActWELL) initiated within breast screening clinics: a randomised controlled trial
    Anderson, Annie S.
    Chong, Huey Yi
    Craigie, Angela M.
    Donnan, Peter T.
    Gallant, Stephanie
    Hickman, Amy
    McAdam, Chloe
    McKell, Jennifer
    McNamee, Paul
    Macaskill, E. Jane
    Mutrie, Nanette
    O'Carroll, Ronan E.
    Rauchhaus, Petra
    Sattar, Naveed
    Stead, Martine
    Treweek, Shaun
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL NUTRITION AND PHYSICAL ACTIVITY, 2021, 18 (01)
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2014, BMJ-BRIT MED J, DOI DOI 10.1136/BMJ.G1823
  • [4] Screening and brief intervention for obesity in primary care: a parallel, two-arm, randomised trial
    Aveyard, Paul
    Lewis, Amanda
    Tearne, Sarah
    Hood, Kathryn
    Christian-Brown, Anna
    Adab, Peymane
    Begh, Rachna
    Jolly, Kate
    Daley, Amanda
    Farley, Amanda
    Lycett, Deborah
    Nickless, Alecia
    Yu, Ly-Mee
    Retat, Lise
    Webber, Laura
    Pimpin, Laura
    Jebb, Susan A.
    [J]. LANCET, 2016, 388 (10059) : 2492 - 2500
  • [5] An introduction to implementation science for the non-specialist
    Mark S. Bauer
    Laura Damschroder
    Hildi Hagedorn
    Jeffrey Smith
    Amy M. Kilbourne
    [J]. BMC Psychology, 3 (1)
  • [6] Cancer Research UK, 2016, BOW CANC STAT
  • [7] Bowel health to better health: a minimal contact lifestyle intervention for people at increased risk of colorectal cancer
    Caswell, Stephen
    Anderson, Annie S.
    Steele, Robert J. C.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF NUTRITION, 2009, 102 (11) : 1541 - 1546
  • [8] Cancer has overtaken cardiovascular disease as the commonest cause of death in Scottish type 2 diabetes patients: A population-based study (The Ayrshire Diabetes Follow-up Cohort study)
    Collier, Andrew
    Meney, Carron
    Hair, Mario
    Cameron, Lyall
    Boyle, James G.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DIABETES INVESTIGATION, 2020, 11 (01) : 55 - 61
  • [9] Study protocol for BeWEL: The impact of a BodyWEight and physicaL activity intervention on adults at risk of developing colorectal adenomas
    Craigie, Angela M.
    Caswell, Stephen
    Paterson, Caron
    Treweek, Shaun
    Belch, Jill J. F.
    Daly, Fergus
    Rodger, Jackie
    Thompson, Joyce
    Kirk, Alison
    Ludbrook, Anne
    Stead, Martine
    Wardle, Jane
    Steele, Robert J. C.
    Anderson, Annie S.
    [J]. BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, 2011, 11
  • [10] Systematic review and meta-analysis of the association between diabetes mellitus and incidence and mortality in breast and colorectal cancer
    de Bruijn, K. M. J.
    Arends, L. R.
    Hansen, B. E.
    Leeflang, S.
    Ruiter, R.
    van Eijck, C. H. J.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2013, 100 (11) : 1421 - 1429