Dietary Bacillus spp. supplementation to both sow and progenies improved post-weaning growth rate, gut function, and reduce the pro-inflammatory cytokine production in weaners challenged with Escherichia coli K88

被引:4
作者
Sampath, Vetriselvi [1 ]
Cho, Sungbo [1 ]
Jeong, Jinuk [2 ]
Mun, Seyoung [3 ,4 ]
Lee, Choon Han [5 ]
Hermes, Rafael Gustavo [5 ]
Taechavasonyoo, Apichaya [5 ]
Smeets, Natasja [5 ]
Kirwan, Susanne [5 ]
Han, Kyudong [3 ,4 ]
Kim, In Ho [1 ]
机构
[1] Dankook Univ, Dept Anim Resource & Sci, 29 Anseodong, Chungnam 330714, South Korea
[2] Dankook Univ, Dept Bioconvergence Engn, Jukjeon 16890, South Korea
[3] Dankook Univ, Coll Sci & Technol, Dept Microbiol, Cheonan 31116, South Korea
[4] Dankook Univ, Ctr Biomed Engn Core Facil, Cheonan 31116, South Korea
[5] Kemin Ind Inc Headquarters, 1900 Scott Ave Moines, Des Moines, IA 50317 USA
关键词
Probiotics; Growth performance; Gut microbiome; Cytokine immune response; Weanling pig; NUTRIENT DIGESTIBILITY; PROBIOTIC SUPPLEMENTATION; REPRODUCTIVE-PERFORMANCE; HEALTH-STATUS; PIGS; MICROBIOTA; PIGLETS; COLONIZATION; ENVIRONMENT; RESPONSES;
D O I
10.1186/s42523-024-00290-y
中图分类号
Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 100705 ;
摘要
Background The use of probiotics (PRO) in late gestation sow and their impact on progenies' performance during the post-weaning stage has received more attention from the researchers recently. This study aimed to analyze the effect of probiotic mixture (Bacillus subtilis and Bacillus licheniformis) on both sow and offspring's performance. Methods First experiment (Exp.1) was conducted from the 100th day of gestation through to post-weaning. A total of twenty sows and their litters were assigned to one of two dietary treatments, Control (CON) based diet and PRO- CON+ 0.05% probiotic mixture. Dietary treatments were arranged in a split-plot pattern with sow and weaner treatment (CON and PRO diet) as the main and sub plot. Exp.2. E. coli challenge study was carried out two weeks after weaning with 40 piglets. Dietary treatments remained same while all pigs were orally administered with a 1.5 ml suspension of 1010 CFU of K88 strain of E. coli per ml. Result PRO group sow showed significantly decreased backfat thickness difference and body weight difference after farrowing and at the end of weaning d21. The nutrient digestibility of PRO group sows was significantly higher at the end of weaning. Moreover, piglets born from PRO group sow showed higher weaning weight and tend to increase average daily gain at the end of d21. The addition of mixed probiotic in sow and weaner diet had suppressed the production of TNF-alpha and interleukin-6 in E. coli challenged pigs. The phyla Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes in E. coli -challenged pigs were highly abundant while, the relative abundance of clostridium_sensu_stricto_1 at genus level was significantly reduced by the inclusion of probiotic in both the sow and weaner diet. Also, taxonomic distribution analysis showed significantly lower prevalence of Clostridium and Brachyspira and higher prevalence of Lactobacilli in E. coli-challenged pigs that were born from PRO group sow and fed CON and PRO weaner diet. Conclusion This study reveals that the inclusion of 0.05% mixed probiotics (Bacillus spp.) to both sow and their progenies diet would be more beneficial to enhance the post-weaning growth rate, gut health, and immune status of E. coli challenged pigs.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 65 条
  • [1] The Effects of Bacterial Lipopolysaccharide (LPS) on Turkey Poults: Assessment of Biochemical Parameters and Histopathological Changes
    Abou Elazab, Mohamed F.
    Nasr, Nasr E.
    Ahmed, Mohamed S.
    Alrashdi, Barakat M.
    Dahran, Naief
    Alblihed, Mohamed A.
    Elmahallawy, Ehab Kotb
    [J]. VETERINARY SCIENCES, 2022, 9 (05)
  • [2] Cytokine Tuning of Intestinal Epithelial Function
    Andrews, Caroline
    McLean, Mairi H.
    Durum, Scott K.
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN IMMUNOLOGY, 2018, 9
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2005, AOAC Official Method 994.12 Amino Acids in Feeds AOAC
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2001, Report of a joint FAO/WHO expert consultation
  • [5] Ayala Lázara, 2015, Cuban J. Agric. Sci., V49, P71
  • [6] The effect of a Bacillus-based direct-fed microbial supplemented to sows on the gastrointestinal microbiota of their neonatal piglets
    Baker, A. A.
    Davis, E.
    Spencer, J. D.
    Moser, R.
    Rehberger, T.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2013, 91 (07) : 3390 - 3399
  • [7] Practical aspects of the use of probiotics in pig production: A review
    Barba-Vidal, Emili
    Martin-Orue, Susana M.
    Castillejos, Lorena
    [J]. LIVESTOCK SCIENCE, 2019, 223 : 84 - 96
  • [8] Bezkorovainy A, 2001, AM J CLIN NUTR, V73, p399S, DOI 10.1093/ajcn/73.2.399s
  • [9] Dietary probiotic supplementation and resulting effects on performance, health status, and microbial characteristics of primiparous sows
    Boehmer, B. M.
    Kramer, W.
    Roth-Maier, D. A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ANIMAL PHYSIOLOGY AND ANIMAL NUTRITION, 2006, 90 (7-8) : 309 - 315
  • [10] Reproducible, interactive, scalable and extensible microbiome data science using QIIME 2
    Bolyen, Evan
    Rideout, Jai Ram
    Dillon, Matthew R.
    Bokulich, NicholasA.
    Abnet, Christian C.
    Al-Ghalith, Gabriel A.
    Alexander, Harriet
    Alm, Eric J.
    Arumugam, Manimozhiyan
    Asnicar, Francesco
    Bai, Yang
    Bisanz, Jordan E.
    Bittinger, Kyle
    Brejnrod, Asker
    Brislawn, Colin J.
    Brown, C. Titus
    Callahan, Benjamin J.
    Caraballo-Rodriguez, Andres Mauricio
    Chase, John
    Cope, Emily K.
    Da Silva, Ricardo
    Diener, Christian
    Dorrestein, Pieter C.
    Douglas, Gavin M.
    Durall, Daniel M.
    Duvallet, Claire
    Edwardson, Christian F.
    Ernst, Madeleine
    Estaki, Mehrbod
    Fouquier, Jennifer
    Gauglitz, Julia M.
    Gibbons, Sean M.
    Gibson, Deanna L.
    Gonzalez, Antonio
    Gorlick, Kestrel
    Guo, Jiarong
    Hillmann, Benjamin
    Holmes, Susan
    Holste, Hannes
    Huttenhower, Curtis
    Huttley, Gavin A.
    Janssen, Stefan
    Jarmusch, Alan K.
    Jiang, Lingjing
    Kaehler, Benjamin D.
    Bin Kang, Kyo
    Keefe, Christopher R.
    Keim, Paul
    Kelley, Scott T.
    Knights, Dan
    [J]. NATURE BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2019, 37 (08) : 852 - 857