Methods and measures to evaluate the impact of participatory model building on public policymakers: a scoping review protocol

被引:0
|
作者
Henson, Rosie Mae [1 ]
Purtle, Jonathan [2 ]
Headen, Irene [3 ]
Stankov, Ivana [4 ,5 ]
Langellier, Brent A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Drexel Univ, Dornsife Sch Publ Hlth, Hlth Management & Policy, Philadelphia, PA USA
[2] NYU, Dept Publ Hlth Policy & Management, New York, NY 10012 USA
[3] Drexel Univ, Dornsife Sch Publ Hlth, Community Hlth & Prevent, Philadelphia, PA USA
[4] Drexel Univ, Dornsife Sch Publ Hlth, Urban Hlth Collaborat, Philadelphia, PA USA
[5] Univ South Australia, Allied Hlth & Human Performance Acad Unit, Adelaide, SA, Australia
来源
BMJ OPEN | 2024年 / 14卷 / 01期
关键词
Health policy; Health Equity; PUBLIC HEALTH; Community-Based Participatory Research; Decision Making; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2023-074891
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction Public policymakers are increasingly engaged in participatory model building processes, such as group model building. Understanding the impacts of policymaker participation in these processes on policymakers is important given that their decisions often have significant influence on the dynamics of complex systems that affect health. Little is known about the extent to which the impacts of participatory model building on public policymakers have been evaluated or the methods and measures used to evaluate these impacts.Methods and analysis A scoping review protocol was developed with the objectives of: (1) scoping studies that have evaluated the impacts of facilitated participatory model building processes on public policymakers who participated in these processes; and (2) describing methods and measures used to evaluate impacts and the main findings of these evaluations. The Joanna Briggs Institute's Population, Concept, Context framework was used to formulate the article identification process. Seven electronic databases-MEDLINE (Ovid), ProQuest Health and Medical, Scopus, Web of Science, Embase (Ovid), CINAHL Complete and PsycInfo-will be searched. Identified articles will be screened according to inclusion and exclusion criteria and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews checklist for scoping reviews will be used and reported. A data extraction tool will collect information across three domains: study characteristics, methods and measures, and findings. The review will be conducted using Covidence, a systematic review data management platform.Ethics and dissemination The scoping review produced will generate an overview of how public policymaker engagement in participatory model building processes has been evaluated. Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and to communities of practice that convene policymakers in participatory model building processes. This review will not require ethics approval because it is not human subject research.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Key elements and effects of cardiovascular disease management programs based on community-based participatory research: protocol for a scoping review
    Juhyeon Yang
    Eunsim Kim
    Bohyun Park
    Systematic Reviews, 10
  • [42] Developing patient-reported experience measures to evaluate an Emergency Department Outreach Programme for people experiencing homelessness in Toronto, Canada: a community-based participatory research study protocol
    Xiao, Sarah
    Handford, Curtis
    Pinto, Andrew
    Snider, Carolyn
    BMJ OPEN, 2025, 15 (02): : e094621
  • [43] Addressing Challenges When Applying GRADE to Public Health Guidelines: A Scoping Review Protocol and Pilot Analysis
    Kantorova, Lucia
    Friessova, Tereza
    Slezakova, Simona
    Langaufova, Alena
    Kantor, Jiri
    Munn, Zachary
    Barker, Timothy Hugh
    Katikireddi, Srinivasa Vittal
    Mustafa, Reem A.
    Zuljevic, Marija Franka
    Lukezic, Marina
    Klugarova, Jitka
    Riad, Abanoub
    Vrbova, Tereza
    Pokorna, Andrea
    Burilova, Petra
    Buril, Jiri
    Kirkovski, Aleksandar
    Cacic, Nensi
    Delac, Ljerka
    Tokalic, Ruzica
    Pericic, Tina Poklepovic
    Klugar, Miloslav
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 19 (02)
  • [44] Impact of urban greening on population health in sub-Saharan Africa: a scoping review protocol
    Ansah, Edward Wilson
    Antiri, Ebenezer Oduro
    Awuah, Hilary Konadu
    Salu, Promise
    Adoripore, John
    Boakye, Anthony Edward
    BMJ OPEN, 2024, 14 (10):
  • [45] Protocol for a multi-domain scoping review to identify measures of decision-making ability in an ageing population
    Ho, Emily H.
    Ece, Berivan
    Novack, Miriam A.
    Pila, Sarah
    Karpouzian-Rogers, Tatiana
    Mather, Molly A.
    Dworak, Elizabeth McManus
    Hosseinian, Zahra
    Bucko, Patricia
    Kaat, Aaron James
    Han, S. Duke
    Lichtenberg, Peter
    Hanmer, Janel
    Miller, Corinne H.
    Gershon, Richard
    Weintraub, Sandra
    BMJ OPEN, 2024, 14 (12):
  • [46] Impact of child development at primary school entry on adolescent health-protocol for a participatory systematic review
    Black, Michelle
    Barnes, Amy
    Strong, Mark
    Taylor-Robinson, David
    SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2021, 10 (01)
  • [47] Use of health-related quality-of-life measures for Indigenous child and youth populations: a scoping review protocol
    McCarty, Georgia
    Derrett, Sarah
    Sullivan, Trudy
    Crengle, Sue
    Wyeth, Emma
    BMJ OPEN, 2021, 11 (06):
  • [48] e-Learning Evaluation Framework and Tools for Global Health and Public Health Education: Protocol for a Scoping Review
    Bahattab, Awsan
    Hanna, Michel
    Voicescu, George Teo
    Hubloue, Ives
    Della Corte, Francesco
    Ragazzoni, Luca
    JMIR RESEARCH PROTOCOLS, 2023, 12
  • [49] Impact of cardiovascular evaluations and interventions on fall risk in older adults: a protocol for a scoping review and evidence map
    Wang, Liping
    van Poelgeest, Eveline P.
    Pronk, Anouschka C.
    Daams, Joost G.
    Leeflang, Mariska M. G.
    Hoekstra, Alfons G.
    van der Velde, Nathalie
    BMJ OPEN, 2022, 12 (04):
  • [50] Impact of remuneration, extrinsic and intrinsic incentives on interprofessional primary care teams: protocol for a rapid scoping review
    Aggarwal, Monica
    Hutchison, Brian
    Kokorelias, Kristina Marie
    Mehta, Kavita
    Greenberg, Leslie
    Moran, Kimberly
    Barber, David
    Samson, Kevin
    BMJ OPEN, 2023, 13 (06):