Methods and measures to evaluate the impact of participatory model building on public policymakers: a scoping review protocol

被引:0
|
作者
Henson, Rosie Mae [1 ]
Purtle, Jonathan [2 ]
Headen, Irene [3 ]
Stankov, Ivana [4 ,5 ]
Langellier, Brent A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Drexel Univ, Dornsife Sch Publ Hlth, Hlth Management & Policy, Philadelphia, PA USA
[2] NYU, Dept Publ Hlth Policy & Management, New York, NY 10012 USA
[3] Drexel Univ, Dornsife Sch Publ Hlth, Community Hlth & Prevent, Philadelphia, PA USA
[4] Drexel Univ, Dornsife Sch Publ Hlth, Urban Hlth Collaborat, Philadelphia, PA USA
[5] Univ South Australia, Allied Hlth & Human Performance Acad Unit, Adelaide, SA, Australia
来源
BMJ OPEN | 2024年 / 14卷 / 01期
关键词
Health policy; Health Equity; PUBLIC HEALTH; Community-Based Participatory Research; Decision Making; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2023-074891
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction Public policymakers are increasingly engaged in participatory model building processes, such as group model building. Understanding the impacts of policymaker participation in these processes on policymakers is important given that their decisions often have significant influence on the dynamics of complex systems that affect health. Little is known about the extent to which the impacts of participatory model building on public policymakers have been evaluated or the methods and measures used to evaluate these impacts.Methods and analysis A scoping review protocol was developed with the objectives of: (1) scoping studies that have evaluated the impacts of facilitated participatory model building processes on public policymakers who participated in these processes; and (2) describing methods and measures used to evaluate impacts and the main findings of these evaluations. The Joanna Briggs Institute's Population, Concept, Context framework was used to formulate the article identification process. Seven electronic databases-MEDLINE (Ovid), ProQuest Health and Medical, Scopus, Web of Science, Embase (Ovid), CINAHL Complete and PsycInfo-will be searched. Identified articles will be screened according to inclusion and exclusion criteria and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews checklist for scoping reviews will be used and reported. A data extraction tool will collect information across three domains: study characteristics, methods and measures, and findings. The review will be conducted using Covidence, a systematic review data management platform.Ethics and dissemination The scoping review produced will generate an overview of how public policymaker engagement in participatory model building processes has been evaluated. Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and to communities of practice that convene policymakers in participatory model building processes. This review will not require ethics approval because it is not human subject research.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Protocol for a scoping review of measures and definitions of gender-based discrimination linked to health outcomes in low and middle-income countries
    Petitfour, Laurene
    Srivastava, Swati
    Shah-Rohlfs, Rupal
    Orduhan, Clara
    Quentin, Wilm
    De Allegri, Manuela
    BMJ OPEN, 2022, 12 (12):
  • [32] Reducing the incidence and impact of peer-to-peer online trolling: a protocol for a scoping review
    Beatson, Amanda Tracy
    Riedel, Aimee
    Mulcahy, Rory
    Keating, Byron William
    Wang, Shasha
    Campbell, Marilyn
    Johnson, Daniel
    BMJ OPEN, 2023, 13 (03):
  • [33] Impact of digital assistive technologies on the quality of life for people with dementia: protocol for a scoping review
    Schneider, Charlotte
    Kowatsch, Tobias
    Vinay, Rasita
    BMJ OPEN, 2023, 13 (12):
  • [34] Exploring how patients, carers and members of the public are recruited to advisory boards, groups and panels as partners in public and patient involved health research: a scoping review protocol
    Koskinas, Elena
    Gilfoyle, Meghan
    Salsberg, Jon
    BMJ OPEN, 2022, 12 (04):
  • [35] Current pesticide suicide surveillance methods used across the African continent: a scoping review protocol
    Brassell, Maxine
    Karunarathne, Ayanthi
    Utyasheva, Leah
    Eddleston, Michael
    Konradsen, Flemming
    Rother, Hanna-Andrea
    BMJ OPEN, 2022, 12 (08):
  • [36] Impact of child development at primary school entry on adolescent health—protocol for a participatory systematic review
    Michelle Black
    Amy Barnes
    Mark Strong
    David Taylor-Robinson
    Systematic Reviews, 10
  • [37] University-Community Partnerships Using a Participatory Action Research Model to Evaluate the Impact of Dance for Health
    Atkins, Rahshida
    Deatrick, Janet A.
    Bowman, Cory
    Bolick, Ansley
    McCurry, Ian
    Lipman, Terri H.
    BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES, 2018, 8 (12):
  • [38] Systems thinking and complexity science methods and the policy process in non-communicable disease prevention: a systematic scoping review protocol
    Astbury, Chloe Clifford
    McGill, Elizabeth
    Egan, Matt
    Penney, Tarra L.
    BMJ OPEN, 2021, 11 (09):
  • [39] Key elements and effects of cardiovascular disease management programs based on community-based participatory research: protocol for a scoping review
    Yang, Juhyeon
    Kim, Eunsim
    Park, Bohyun
    SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2021, 10 (01)
  • [40] Protocol for a scoping review to evaluate the extent of utilisation of healthcare services by asthma patients in sub-Saharan African countries
    Ndarukwa, Pisirai
    Chimbari, Moses John
    Sibanda, Elopy
    BMJ OPEN, 2021, 11 (08):