Methods and measures to evaluate the impact of participatory model building on public policymakers: a scoping review protocol

被引:0
|
作者
Henson, Rosie Mae [1 ]
Purtle, Jonathan [2 ]
Headen, Irene [3 ]
Stankov, Ivana [4 ,5 ]
Langellier, Brent A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Drexel Univ, Dornsife Sch Publ Hlth, Hlth Management & Policy, Philadelphia, PA USA
[2] NYU, Dept Publ Hlth Policy & Management, New York, NY 10012 USA
[3] Drexel Univ, Dornsife Sch Publ Hlth, Community Hlth & Prevent, Philadelphia, PA USA
[4] Drexel Univ, Dornsife Sch Publ Hlth, Urban Hlth Collaborat, Philadelphia, PA USA
[5] Univ South Australia, Allied Hlth & Human Performance Acad Unit, Adelaide, SA, Australia
来源
BMJ OPEN | 2024年 / 14卷 / 01期
关键词
Health policy; Health Equity; PUBLIC HEALTH; Community-Based Participatory Research; Decision Making; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2023-074891
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction Public policymakers are increasingly engaged in participatory model building processes, such as group model building. Understanding the impacts of policymaker participation in these processes on policymakers is important given that their decisions often have significant influence on the dynamics of complex systems that affect health. Little is known about the extent to which the impacts of participatory model building on public policymakers have been evaluated or the methods and measures used to evaluate these impacts.Methods and analysis A scoping review protocol was developed with the objectives of: (1) scoping studies that have evaluated the impacts of facilitated participatory model building processes on public policymakers who participated in these processes; and (2) describing methods and measures used to evaluate impacts and the main findings of these evaluations. The Joanna Briggs Institute's Population, Concept, Context framework was used to formulate the article identification process. Seven electronic databases-MEDLINE (Ovid), ProQuest Health and Medical, Scopus, Web of Science, Embase (Ovid), CINAHL Complete and PsycInfo-will be searched. Identified articles will be screened according to inclusion and exclusion criteria and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews checklist for scoping reviews will be used and reported. A data extraction tool will collect information across three domains: study characteristics, methods and measures, and findings. The review will be conducted using Covidence, a systematic review data management platform.Ethics and dissemination The scoping review produced will generate an overview of how public policymaker engagement in participatory model building processes has been evaluated. Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and to communities of practice that convene policymakers in participatory model building processes. This review will not require ethics approval because it is not human subject research.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Participatory approaches in the context of research into workplace health promotion to improve physical activity levels and reduce sedentary behaviour among office-based workers: protocol for a scoping review
    Buffey, Aidan John
    Carson, Brian
    Donnelly, Alan
    Salsberg, Jon
    BMJ OPEN, 2021, 11 (12):
  • [22] Assessing public health emergency preparedness: A scoping review on recent tools and methods
    Chiossi, Scott
    Tsolova, Svetla
    Ciotti, Massimo
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DISASTER RISK REDUCTION, 2021, 56
  • [23] Quantitative Methods Used to Evaluate Impact of Combination HIV Prevention Intervention: A Methodological Systematic Review
    Ravalihasy, Andrainolo
    Ante-Testard, Pearl Anne
    Kardas-Sloma, Lidia
    Yazdanpanah, Yazdan
    De Allegri, Manuela
    Ridde, Valery
    AIDS AND BEHAVIOR, 2023, 27 (08) : 2763 - 2773
  • [24] The use and application of Lean Management methods to research processes-a scoping review protocol
    Wraae, Caroline Ariane Dahl
    Opstrup, Niels
    Kyvik, Kirsten Ohm
    Brixen, Kim
    Wien, Charlotte
    BMJ OPEN, 2024, 14 (05):
  • [25] Methods and approaches for developing plain language versions of guidelines recommendations: Scoping review protocol
    Friessova, Tereza
    Langaufova, Alena
    Dolanova, Dana
    Beharkova, Natalia
    Vrbova, Tereza
    Burilova, Petra
    Pokorna, Andrea
    JOURNAL OF EVALUATION IN CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2024, 30 (08) : 1543 - 1545
  • [26] Patient involvement in patient safety measures: the impact of demographic and socioeconomic factors - a scoping review
    Monaca, Clara
    Weigl, Matthias
    Pfaff, Holger
    Hammer, Antje
    JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH-HEIDELBERG, 2024,
  • [27] Engaging people with lived experiences on community advisory boards in community-based participatory research: a scoping review protocol
    Nelson, Georgia
    Kettaneh, Hasan
    Knox, Bruce
    Purkey, Eva
    Chan-Nguyen, Sophy
    Jenkins, Meghan
    Bayoumi, Imaan
    BMJ OPEN, 2024, 14 (03):
  • [28] Youth involvement in policy processes in public health, education, and social work: Protocol for a scoping review
    Helleve, Arnfinn
    Flodgren, Gerd Monika
    Blanchard, Laurence
    Fismen, Anne-Siri
    Rutter, Harry
    Mathisen, Jonas Rekdal
    Klepp, Knut-Inge
    OBESITY REVIEWS, 2023, 24
  • [29] Exploring the Equity Impact of Current Digital Health Design Practices: Protocol for a Scoping Review
    Evans, Laura
    Evans, Jay
    Pagliari, Claudia
    Kallander, Karin
    JMIR RESEARCH PROTOCOLS, 2022, 11 (05):
  • [30] The Conceptualization and Measurement of Research Impact in Primary Health Care: Protocol for a Rapid Scoping Review
    Aggarwal, Monica
    Hutchison, Brian G.
    Kokorelias, Kristina M.
    Ramsden, Vivian R.
    Ivers, Noah M.
    Pinto, Andrew
    Uphsur, Ross E. G.
    Wong, Sabrina
    Pimlott, Nick
    Slade, Steve
    JMIR RESEARCH PROTOCOLS, 2024, 13