Methods and measures to evaluate the impact of participatory model building on public policymakers: a scoping review protocol

被引:0
|
作者
Henson, Rosie Mae [1 ]
Purtle, Jonathan [2 ]
Headen, Irene [3 ]
Stankov, Ivana [4 ,5 ]
Langellier, Brent A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Drexel Univ, Dornsife Sch Publ Hlth, Hlth Management & Policy, Philadelphia, PA USA
[2] NYU, Dept Publ Hlth Policy & Management, New York, NY 10012 USA
[3] Drexel Univ, Dornsife Sch Publ Hlth, Community Hlth & Prevent, Philadelphia, PA USA
[4] Drexel Univ, Dornsife Sch Publ Hlth, Urban Hlth Collaborat, Philadelphia, PA USA
[5] Univ South Australia, Allied Hlth & Human Performance Acad Unit, Adelaide, SA, Australia
来源
BMJ OPEN | 2024年 / 14卷 / 01期
关键词
Health policy; Health Equity; PUBLIC HEALTH; Community-Based Participatory Research; Decision Making; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2023-074891
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction Public policymakers are increasingly engaged in participatory model building processes, such as group model building. Understanding the impacts of policymaker participation in these processes on policymakers is important given that their decisions often have significant influence on the dynamics of complex systems that affect health. Little is known about the extent to which the impacts of participatory model building on public policymakers have been evaluated or the methods and measures used to evaluate these impacts.Methods and analysis A scoping review protocol was developed with the objectives of: (1) scoping studies that have evaluated the impacts of facilitated participatory model building processes on public policymakers who participated in these processes; and (2) describing methods and measures used to evaluate impacts and the main findings of these evaluations. The Joanna Briggs Institute's Population, Concept, Context framework was used to formulate the article identification process. Seven electronic databases-MEDLINE (Ovid), ProQuest Health and Medical, Scopus, Web of Science, Embase (Ovid), CINAHL Complete and PsycInfo-will be searched. Identified articles will be screened according to inclusion and exclusion criteria and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews checklist for scoping reviews will be used and reported. A data extraction tool will collect information across three domains: study characteristics, methods and measures, and findings. The review will be conducted using Covidence, a systematic review data management platform.Ethics and dissemination The scoping review produced will generate an overview of how public policymaker engagement in participatory model building processes has been evaluated. Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and to communities of practice that convene policymakers in participatory model building processes. This review will not require ethics approval because it is not human subject research.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Conceptualising, operationalising and measuring trust in participatory health research networks: a scoping review protocol
    Gilfoyle, Meghan
    MacFarlane, Anne
    Salsberg, Jon
    BMJ OPEN, 2020, 10 (10):
  • [2] National Public Health Dashboards: Protocol for a Scoping Review
    Yanovitzky, Itzhak
    Stahlman, Gretchen
    Quow, Justine
    Ackerman, Matthew
    Perry, Yehuda
    Kim, Miriam
    JMIR RESEARCH PROTOCOLS, 2024, 13
  • [3] Facilitators of and barriers to patient and public involvement in building learning health systems in community health services settings: a scoping review protocol
    Hung, Lillian
    Wong, Karen Lok Yi
    Chan, Ian
    Vasarhelyi, Krisztina
    BMJ OPEN, 2023, 13 (09):
  • [4] Mapping precision public health definitions, terminology and applications: a scoping review protocol
    Bosward, Rebecca
    Braunack-Mayer, Annette
    Frost, Emma
    Carter, Stacy
    BMJ OPEN, 2022, 12 (02):
  • [5] Evaluation instruments for public health policies for elderly care: a scoping review protocol
    de Amorim, Margareth Santos
    de Medeiros, Kleyton Santos
    Seixas, Clarissa Terenzi
    Nobre, Thaiza Teixeira Xavier
    BMJ OPEN, 2024, 14 (12):
  • [6] Characteristics of knowledge translation platforms and methods for evaluating them: a scoping review protocol
    Schmidt, Bey-Marrie
    Cooper, Sara
    Young, Taryn
    Jessani, Nasreen S.
    BMJ OPEN, 2022, 12 (06):
  • [7] Public health approaches to substance use: a scoping review protocol
    Kosteniuk, Brynn
    Speed, Kelsey
    Candler, Ethan
    Campbell, Sandy
    Penney, Greg
    Moen, Karin
    Hyshka, Elaine
    JBI EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS, 2022, 20 (09) : 2395 - 2407
  • [8] Describing youth participatory evaluation of educational interventions as a key domain of the social determinants of health: protocol for a scoping review
    Montrosse-Moorhead, Bianca
    Sutter, Amanda
    Phiri, Chisomo
    Perdomo, Luna De La Cruz
    BMJ OPEN, 2024, 14 (10): : e081978
  • [9] Mapping definitions, measures and methodologies of assessing police violence in the health literature: a scoping review protocol
    Harris, Latesha K.
    Conklin, Jamie L.
    Woods-Giscombe, Cheryl L.
    Cortes, Yamnia, I
    BMJ OPEN, 2023, 13 (03):
  • [10] A scoping review of methods to measure and evaluate citizen engagement in health research
    Shahid A.
    Lalani I.N.
    Rosgen B.K.
    Sept B.G.
    Longmore S.
    Parsons Leigh J.
    Stelfox H.T.
    Fiest K.M.
    Research Involvement and Engagement, 8 (1)