Developing and Evaluating an Online Professional Development Model on Academic Writing Conventions and Norms in English

被引:0
作者
Kaya, Fatma [1 ,3 ]
Yagiz, Oktay [2 ]
机构
[1] Ataturk Univ, Sch Foreign Languages, Erzurum, Turkiye
[2] Ataturk Univ, Sch Educ, Dept English Teaching, Erzurum, Turkiye
[3] Ataturk Univ, Sch Foreign Languages, TR-25240 Erzurum, Turkiye
关键词
academic writing; feedback; online tutoring; higher education; professional development; PUBLISHING RESEARCH; GRADUATE-STUDENTS; DOCTORAL STUDENTS; RESEARCH ARTICLES; PUBLICATION; STRATEGIES; INSTRUCTION; PLAGIARISM; SCHOLARS; JOURNALS;
D O I
10.1177/21582440231212786
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
This study aimed to determine non-native speakers of English academics' knowledge and awareness of conventions and norms of academic writing (AW), to develop an online professional development model addressing all disciplines, and to evaluate the effect of this model on their AW performances with their views on the model. The study was based on the mixed methods evaluation design. The participants were nine academics in educational and social sciences at a state university in Turkey. An online professional development model encompassing eight themes related to AW was developed. Data were collected through pre- and post-tutorial semi-structured interviews and writing tasks. Textual and content analyses were used for the qualitative data, and the Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test was performed for quantitative analysis. The results showed that before the tutoring, the participants acknowledged various difficulties regarding AW conventions and norms. The data after the online asynchronous tutoring showed that explicit instruction increased the participants' knowledge and awareness, and the proposed model contributed to their writing performances, and promoted their AW skills. However, participants' hedging use was found limited to modal verbs use. Paraphrasing tasks also showed significant differences between before and after tutoring writing tasks. Participants highlighted the importance of long-term implementational writing instruction.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 75 条
[1]   Processing of cohesive ties by EFL Arab college students [J].
Al-Jarf, RS .
FOREIGN LANGUAGE ANNALS, 2001, 34 (02) :141-151
[2]   Learning the practice of scholarly publication in English - A Romanian perspective [J].
Bardi, Mirela .
ENGLISH FOR SPECIFIC PURPOSES, 2015, 37 :98-111
[3]  
Buckingham L., 2008, INT J DOCTORAL STUDI, V3, P1
[4]  
Butler H.G., 2006, A framework for course design in academic writing for tertiary education
[5]  
Cesme H., 2015, Paraphrase approaches, challenges and strategies of graduate students in the department of English language teaching
[6]  
Chiang S., 2003, System, V31, P471, DOI [10.1016/j.system.2003.02.002, DOI 10.1016/J.SYSTEM.2003.02.002]
[7]   Writing for Scholarly Publication in English for Taiwanese Researchers in the Field of English Teaching [J].
Chien, Shih-Chieh .
SAGE OPEN, 2019, 9 (03)
[8]  
CHOIYEONHEE, 2012, [English Teaching, 영어교육], V67, P51
[9]   Doctoral students writing: where's the pedagogy? [J].
Cotterall, Sara .
TEACHING IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2011, 16 (04) :413-425
[10]  
Creswell J. W., 2017, Organizational Research Methods, V3rd, DOI [DOI 10.1177/1094428108318066, DOI 10.1111/J.1753-6405.2007.00096.X]