Farm to fork strategy: Animal welfare, EU trade policy, and public participation

被引:13
作者
Molitorisova, Alexandra [1 ,2 ]
Burke, Ciaran [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bayreuth, Fac Life Sci Food Nutr & Hlth, Bayreuth, Germany
[2] Masaryk Univ, Fac Law, Brno, Czech Republic
[3] Friedrich Schiller Univ, Jena Ctr Reconciliat Studies, Jena, Germany
[4] EFTA Surveillance Author, Brussels, Belgium
关键词
animal welfare; EU trade; public consultations; Farm to fork strategy; INTERNATIONAL-TRADE; STANDARDS; IMPACTS;
D O I
10.1002/aepp.13326
中图分类号
F3 [农业经济];
学科分类号
0202 ; 020205 ; 1203 ;
摘要
This article presents an analysis of the Farm to Fork Strategy (F2F Strategy) on animal welfare matters though the lens of EU trade policy and public participation. It shows that the mix of cooperation tools contained in bilateral agreements with trade components support in aggregate the Strategy's actions on animal welfare. However, individual bilateral agreements may need to be renegotiated and modernised to include more powerful cooperation tools to achieve sustainable food systems through the adoption and implementation of animal welfare standards. One way of achieving this is to negotiate the inclusion of sustainable food systems chapters that highlight the linkages between animal welfare, agriculture, sustainability, climate, environment, and public health. However, such robust chapters should be monitored and enforced in a correspondingly robust manner, for example, by restructuring chapters' committees and work groups. The article concludes that enhanced public participation, both at the level of legislative proposals (public consultations) and at the level of trade policy (domestic advisory groups, standardisation committees), may better support achieving policy objectves of animal welfare measures of the F2F Strategy.
引用
收藏
页码:881 / 910
页数:30
相关论文
共 103 条
[11]   Productivity and efficiency of large and small field crop farms and mixed farms of the old and new EU regions [J].
Blazejczyk-Majka, Lucyna ;
Kala, Radoslaw ;
Maciejewski, Krzysztof .
AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS-ZEMEDELSKA EKONOMIKA, 2012, 58 (02) :61-71
[12]  
Boyle LA, 2011, WOODHEAD PUBL FOOD S, P169
[13]  
Bradford A, 2012, NORTHWEST U LAW REV, V107, P1
[14]  
Branch A.E., 1994, EXPORT PRACTICE MANA, Vthird
[15]   Global perspectives on animal welfare: Europe [J].
Caporale, V ;
Alessandrini, B ;
Dalla Villa, P ;
Del Papa, S .
REVUE SCIENTIFIQUE ET TECHNIQUE-OFFICE INTERNATIONAL DES EPIZOOTIES, 2005, 24 (02) :567-577
[16]  
Carere Claudio., 2019, WELFARE INVERTEBRATE, DOI [DOI 10.1007/978-3-030-13947-6, 10.1007/978-3-030-13947-6_1]
[17]  
Cheng B., 1987, General Principles of Law as Applied by International Courts and Tribunals
[18]  
Commission E., 2017, OFFICIAL J EUROPEAN, P141
[19]  
Conrad ChristianeR., 2011, PROCESSES PRODUCTION
[20]  
Csaki Csaba., 2009, POLICY STUD RURAL TR, V4, P44