Airway Pressure Release Ventilation for Acute Respiratory Failure Due to Coronavirus Disease 2019: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

被引:9
作者
Roshdy, Ashraf [1 ,2 ]
Elsayed, Ahmad Samy [3 ]
Saleh, Ahmad Sabry [4 ]
机构
[1] Alexandria Univ, Fac Med, Crit Care Med Dept, Alexandria, Egypt
[2] East Kent Hosp Univ NHS Fdn Trust, William Harvey Hosp, Intens Care Unit, Canterbury, Kent, England
[3] King Fahd Mil Med Complex, Intens Care Unit, Dhahran, Saudi Arabia
[4] Alhayat Clin, Edku, El Beheira, Egypt
关键词
COVID-19; airway pressure release ventilation; mechanical ventilation; respiratory failure; ARDS; EXTRACORPOREAL MEMBRANE-OXYGENATION; ADULT PATIENTS; MANAGEMENT; APRV;
D O I
10.1177/08850666221109779
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Objective To explore the evidence surrounding the use of Airway Pressure Release Ventilation (APRV) in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Methods: A Systematic electronic search of PUBMED, EMBASE, and the WHO COVID-19 database. We also searched the grey literature via Google and preprint servers (medRxive and research square). Eligible studies included randomised controlled trials and observational studies comparing APRV to conventional mechanical ventilation (CMV) in adults with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure due to COVID-19 and reporting at least one of the following outcomes; in-hospital mortality, ventilator free days (VFDs), ICU length of stay (LOS), changes in gas exchange parameters, and barotrauma. Two authors independently screened and selected articles for inclusion and extracted data in a pre-specified form. Results: Of 181 articles screened, seven studies (one randomised controlled trial, two cohort studies, and four before-after studies) were included comprising 354 patients. APRV was initiated at a mean of 1.2-13 days after intubation. APRV wasn't associated with improved mortality compared to CMV (relative risk [RR], 1.20; 95% CI 0.70-2.05; I-2, 61%) neither better VFDs (ratio of means [RoM], 0.80; 95% CI, 0.52-1.24; I-2, 0%) nor ICU LOS (RoM, 1.10; 95% CI, 0.79-1.51; I-2, 57%). Compared to CMV, APRV was associated with a 33% increase in PaO2/FiO(2) ratio (RoM, 1.33; 95% CI, 1.21-1.48; I-2, 29%) and a 9% decrease in PaCO2 (RoM, 1.09; 95% CI, 1.02-1.15; I-2, 0%). There was no significant increased risk of barotrauma compared to CMV (RR, 1.55; 95% CI, 0.60-4.00; I-2, 0%). Conclusions: In adult patients with COVID-19 requiring mechanical ventilation, APRV is associated with improved gas exchange but not mortality nor VFDs when compared with CMV. The results were limited by high uncertainty given the low quality of the available studies and limited number of patients. Adequately powered and well-designed clinical trials to define the role of APRV in COVID-19 patients are still needed. Registration: PROSPERO; CRD42021291234.
引用
收藏
页码:160 / 168
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Airway Pressure Release Ventilation in Adult Patients With Acute Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis*
    Lim, Jolene
    Litton, Edward
    CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2019, 47 (12) : 1794 - 1799
  • [2] Airway pressure release ventilation during acute hypoxemic respiratory failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Carsetti, Andrea
    Damiani, Elisa
    Domizi, Roberta
    Scorcella, Claudia
    Pantanetti, Simona
    Falcetta, Stefano
    Donati, Abele
    Adrario, Erica
    ANNALS OF INTENSIVE CARE, 2019, 9 (1)
  • [3] Airway pressure release ventilation during acute hypoxemic respiratory failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Andrea Carsetti
    Elisa Damiani
    Roberta Domizi
    Claudia Scorcella
    Simona Pantanetti
    Stefano Falcetta
    Abele Donati
    Erica Adrario
    Annals of Intensive Care, 9
  • [4] The safety and efficacy of airway pressure release ventilation in acute respiratory distress syndrome patients A PRISMA-compliant systematic review and meta-analysis
    Sun, Xuri
    Liu, Yuqi
    Li, Neng
    You, Deyuan
    Zhao, Yanping
    MEDICINE, 2020, 99 (01)
  • [5] PREHOSPITAL CONTINUOUS POSITIVE AIRWAY PRESSURE FOR ACUTE RESPIRATORY FAILURE: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS
    Williams, Teresa A.
    Finn, Judith
    Perkins, Gavin D.
    Jacobs, Ian G.
    PREHOSPITAL EMERGENCY CARE, 2013, 17 (02) : 261 - 273
  • [6] Inconsistent Methods Used to Set Airway Pressure Release Ventilation in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Regression Analysis
    Lutz, Mark R.
    Charlamb, Jacob
    Kenna, Joshua R.
    Smith, Abigail
    Glatt, Stephen J.
    Araos, Joaquin D.
    Andrews, Penny L.
    Habashi, Nader M.
    Nieman, Gary F.
    Ghosh, Auyon J.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2024, 13 (09)
  • [7] Airway Pressure Release Ventilation in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome
    Maung, Adrian A.
    Kaplan, Lewis J.
    CRITICAL CARE CLINICS, 2011, 27 (03) : 501 - +
  • [8] Airway pressure release ventilation versus pressure-controlled ventilation in acute hypoxemic respiratory failure
    Ibrahim, Rafaat Talaat
    Mohamed, Yaser Ahmed
    Abd El-kader, Mohamed Saad
    Azouz, Ahmed Metwally
    EGYPTIAN JOURNAL OF CHEST DISEASES AND TUBERCULOSIS, 2022, 71 (01): : 74 - 80
  • [9] Early use of airway pressure release ventilation in acute respiratory distress syndrome induced by coronavirus disease 2019: a case report
    Sinatra, Jadeny
    Salim, Ronnie Wirawan
    Tanoto, Epifanus Arie
    Hariyanto, Hori
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL CASE REPORTS, 2022, 16 (01)
  • [10] Early use of airway pressure release ventilation in acute respiratory distress syndrome induced by coronavirus disease 2019: a case report
    Jadeny Sinatra
    Ronnie Wirawan Salim
    Epifanus Arie Tanoto
    Hori Hariyanto
    Journal of Medical Case Reports, 16