Clinical evaluation questionnaire in advanced cancer: a psychometric study of a novel measure of healthcare provider interactions

被引:3
|
作者
de Vries, Froukje E. [1 ,2 ]
Mah, Kenneth [2 ]
Malfitano, Carmine [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Shapiro, Gilla K. [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Zimmermann, Camilla [2 ,5 ,6 ,7 ,8 ]
Hales, Sarah [2 ,5 ]
Rodin, Gary [2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ,8 ]
机构
[1] Netherlands Canc Inst, Dept Psychiat, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Univ Hlth Network, Dept Support Care, Princess Margaret Canc Ctr, Toronto, ON, Canada
[3] Univ Hlth Network, Global Inst Psychosocial Palliat & End Life Care, Princess Margaret Canc Ctr, Toronto, ON, Canada
[4] Univ Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
[5] Univ Toronto, Dept Psychiat, Toronto, ON, Canada
[6] Univ Toronto, Dept Med, Div Med Oncol, Toronto, ON, Canada
[7] Univ Toronto, Dept Med, Div Palliat Med, Toronto, ON, Canada
[8] Univ Hlth Network, Princess Margaret Res Inst, Princess Margaret Canc Ctr, Toronto, ON, Canada
基金
加拿大健康研究院;
关键词
psychological care; quality of life; supportive care; cancer; BRIEF INDIVIDUAL PSYCHOTHERAPY; LIVING MEANINGFULLY CALM; WELL-BEING SCALE; PATIENT EXPERIENCE; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; MANAGING CANCER; PALLIATIVE CARE; SATISFACTION; DISTRESS; QUALITY;
D O I
10.1136/bmjspcare-2021-003408
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objectives The Clinical Evaluation Questionnaire (CEQ) is a patient-reported experience measure (PREM) that assesses the perceived benefit of therapeutic interactions of patients with advanced cancer with their healthcare providers concerning issues relevant to their illness. It was developed for a randomised controlled trial of Managing Cancer and Living Meaningfully (CALM), a brief supportive-expressive therapy for patients with advanced cancer. The present study evaluates the preliminary psychometric properties of the CEQ. Method Patients in the CALM and usual care groups completed the CEQ 3 (n=195) and 6 (n=186) months after randomisation. The CEQ's internal consistency, factor structure and concurrent validity were evaluated, and CEQ scores in the treatment groups were compared. Results The CEQ demonstrated high internal consistency for both treatment arms (Cronbach's alpha=0.94 to 0.95), and a single factor was consistently found in exploratory factor analyses. CEQ scores correlated significantly with satisfaction with the relationship with healthcare providers (r=0.23 to 0.61, p <= 0.02) and life completion (r=0.24 to 0.37, p <= 0.02) in both groups and with spiritual well-being in the CALM group (meaning: r=0.23 to 0.24, p=0.01 to 0.02; faith: r=0.24 to 0.34, p=0.001 to 0.02). The CALM group showed higher CEQ total scores than usual care at 6 months (CALM: 18.19 +/- 6.59; usual care: 14.36 +/- 7.67, p<0.001). Conclusions The CEQ is a reliable and valid PREM of the benefit perceived by patients with advanced cancer from their interactions with healthcare providers. Further study is needed to establish its value as a measure of perceived intervention benefit across different clinical and research settings.
引用
收藏
页码:e1093 / e1102
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Development and psychometric evaluation of a questionnaire to measure cancer patients' perception of care coordination
    Okado, Izumi
    Cassel, Kevin
    Pagano, Ian
    Holcombe, Randall F.
    BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2020, 20 (01)
  • [2] Development and psychometric evaluation of a questionnaire to measure cancer patients’ perception of care coordination
    Izumi Okado
    Kevin Cassel
    Ian Pagano
    Randall F. Holcombe
    BMC Health Services Research, 20
  • [3] Adaptation and Psychometric Evaluation of the Parenting Concerns Questionnaire-Advanced Disease
    Park, Eliza M.
    Wang, Mian
    Bowers, Savannah M.
    Muriel, Anna C.
    Rauch, Paula K.
    Edwards, Teresa
    Yi, Samantha M.
    Daniel, Brittany
    Hanson, Laura C.
    Song, Mi-Kyung
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HOSPICE & PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 2022, 39 (08) : 918 - 925
  • [4] Psychometric Evaluation of the Cancer Dependent Quality of Life (CancerDQoL) Questionnaire: An Individualised Measure of the Impact of Cancer and Its Treatment on Quality of Life
    Davidson, Jonathan
    Taylor, Michelle D.
    Gilbride, Charlie J.
    Romaine, Jacquelyn
    Tipples, Karen
    Powell, Melanie E.
    Wolstenholme, Virginia
    Bradley, Clare
    PSYCHO-ONCOLOGY, 2024, 33 (10)
  • [5] Psychometric Evaluation of a New Instrument to Measure Uncertainty in Children and Adolescents With Cancer
    Stewart, Janet L.
    Lynn, Mary R.
    Mishel, Merle H.
    NURSING RESEARCH, 2010, 59 (02) : 119 - 126
  • [6] Preliminary development and psychometric evaluation of an unmet needs measure for adolescents and young adults with cancer: the Cancer Needs Questionnaire - Young People (CNQ-YP)
    Clinton-McHarg, Tara
    Carey, Mariko
    Sanson-Fisher, Rob
    D'Este, Catherine
    Shakeshaft, Anthony
    HEALTH AND QUALITY OF LIFE OUTCOMES, 2012, 10
  • [7] Psychometric assessment of the Chinese version of the Problems and Needs in Palliative Care questionnaire-short version in advanced cancer patients
    Wang, Tao
    Molassiotis, Alex
    Chung, Betty Pui Man
    Tan, Jing-Yu
    BMC PALLIATIVE CARE, 2019, 18 (01)
  • [8] Measuring patient and family perceptions of team processes and outcomes in healthcare teams: questionnaire development and psychometric evaluation
    Kilpatrick, Kelley
    Tchouaket, Eric
    Paquette, Lysane
    Guillemette, Claudel
    Jabbour, Mira
    Desmeules, Francois
    Landry, Veronique
    Fernandez, Nicolas
    BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2019, 19 (1)
  • [9] Psychometric evaluation of the German version of the Patient Satisfaction with Cancer-related Care questionnaire
    Bokemeyer, Frederike
    Lange-Drenth, Lukas
    Jean-Pierre, Pascal
    Schulz, Holger
    Bleich, Christiane
    BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2020, 20 (01)
  • [10] Psychometric properties evaluation of persian version of the maastricht clinical teaching questionnaire
    Assarroudi, Abdolghader
    Zardosht, Roghayeh
    IRANIAN JOURNAL OF NURSING AND MIDWIFERY RESEARCH, 2023, 28 (05) : 581 - 586