Cefepime in vivo activity against carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales that test as cefepime susceptible or susceptible-dose dependent in vitro: implications for clinical microbiology laboratory and clinicians

被引:5
作者
Fouad, Aliaa [1 ]
Gill, Christian M. [1 ]
Simner, Patricia J. [2 ]
Nicolau, David P. [1 ,3 ]
Asempa, Tomefa E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Hartford Hosp, Ctr Anti Infect Res & Dev CAIRD, 80 Seymour St, Hartford, CT 06102 USA
[2] Johns Hopkins Univ, Dept Pathol, Sch Med, Baltimore, MD USA
[3] Hartford Hosp, Div Infect Dis, Hartford, CT USA
关键词
BLOOD-STREAM INFECTIONS; PSEUDOMONAS-AERUGINOSA; PIPERACILLIN-TAZOBACTAM; KLEBSIELLA-PNEUMONIAE; OUTCOMES; ESBL; PHARMACODYNAMICS; BREAKPOINTS; THERAPY; COMBINATION;
D O I
10.1093/jac/dkad229
中图分类号
R51 [传染病];
学科分类号
100401 ;
摘要
Background Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) are a public health concern. Among these isolates, there are reports of isolates that test as cefepime susceptible or susceptible-dose dependent (SDD) in vitro despite presence of a carbapenemase. This study aimed to evaluate the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic profile of cefepime against carbapenemase-producing (CP-CRE) and non-producing (non-CP-CRE) isolates with a range of cefepime MICs. Methods Reference broth microdilution and modified carbapenem inactivation method (mCIM) were performed on genotypically characterized clinical CRE isolates. Ultimately, CP-CRE (n = 21; bla(KPC)) and non-CP-CRE (n = 19) isolates with a distribution of cefepime MICs (& LE;0.5 to >256 mg/L) were utilized in the murine thigh infection model. Mice were treated with cefepime human-simulated regimens (HSRs) representative of a standard dose (1 g q12h 0.5 h infusion) or the SDD dose (2 g q8h 0.5 h infusion). Efficacy was assessed as the change in bacterial growth at 24 h compared with 0 h control, where & GE;1 log bacterial reduction is considered translational value for clinical efficacy. Results Among both cohorts of CRE isolates, i.e. CP-CRE and non-CP-CRE, that tested as SDD to cefepime in vitro, 1 log bacterial reduction was not attainable with cefepime. Further blunting of cefepime efficacy was observed among CP-CRE isolates compared with non-CP-CRE across both susceptible and SDD categories. Conclusions Data indicate to avoid cefepime for the treatment of serious infections caused by CRE isolates that test as cefepime susceptible or SDD. Data also provide evidence that isolates with the same antibiotic MIC may have different pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic profiles due to their antimicrobial resistance mechanism.
引用
收藏
页码:2242 / 2253
页数:12
相关论文
共 67 条
[1]   In vivo pharmacodynamics of new-generation β-lactamase inhibitor taniborbactam (formerly VNRX-5133) in combination with cefepime against serine-β-lactamase-producing Gram-negative bacteria [J].
Abdelraouf, Kamilia ;
Abuhussain, Safa Almarzoky ;
Nicolau, David P. .
JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL CHEMOTHERAPY, 2020, 75 (12) :3601-3610
[2]  
Abdelraouf K, 2019, ANTIMICROB AGENTS CH, V63, DOI [10.1128/AAC.00145-19, 10.1128/aac.00145-19]
[3]   Interventional strategies and current clinical experience with carbapenemase-producing Gram-negative bacteria [J].
Akova, M. ;
Daikos, G. L. ;
Tzouvelekis, L. ;
Carmeli, Y. .
CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTION, 2012, 18 (05) :439-448
[4]   Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Gram-Negative Infections Treated With Optimized Dosing Cefepime Over Various Minimum Inhibitory Concentrations [J].
Altshuler, Jerry ;
Guervil, David J. ;
Ericsson, Charles D. ;
Wanger, Audrey ;
Aitken, Samuel L. ;
Ostrosky-Zeichner, Luis .
JOURNAL OF PHARMACY PRACTICE, 2018, 31 (01) :34-39
[5]   Effect of cefepime dose on mortality of patients with Gram-negative bacterial bloodstream infections: a prospective cohort study [J].
Alves, Marcelle D. ;
Ribeiro, Vanessa B. ;
Tessari, Jardel P. ;
Mattiello, Francine ;
De Bacco, Giordanna ;
Luz, Daniela I. ;
Vieira, Fabiane J. ;
Behle, Taina F. ;
Pasqualotto, Alessandro C. ;
Zavascki, Alexandre P. .
JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL CHEMOTHERAPY, 2014, 69 (06) :1681-1687
[6]   Treatment of infections with ESBL-producing organisms: pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic considerations [J].
Andes, D ;
Craig, WA .
CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTION, 2005, 11 :10-17
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2015, Methods for Dilution Antimicrobial Susceptibility Tests for Bacteria That Grow Aerobically, V10th
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2022, Performance standards for Antimicrobial susceptibility testing, V32nd
[9]  
[Anonymous], 2018, Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing
[10]  
Asempa TE, 2023, J ANTIMICROB CHEMOTH, V78, P636, DOI 10.1093/jac/dkac425