Does common ownership constrain managerial rent extraction? Evidence from insider trading profitability

被引:27
作者
Chen, Shenglan [1 ]
Ma, Hui [2 ]
Wu, Qiang [3 ]
Zhang, Hao [4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Zhejiang Univ Technol, Sch Econ, Hangzhou, Peoples R China
[2] Shanghai Univ Finance & Econ, Inst Accounting & Finance, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[3] Hong Kong Polytech Univ, Sch Accounting & Finance, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[4] Rochester Inst Technol, Saunders Coll Business, Rochester, NY USA
[5] Rochester Inst Technol RIT, Saunders Coll Business, 105 Lomb Mem Dr, Rochester, NY 14623 USA
关键词
Common ownership; Managerial opportunism; Insider trading; Institutional investors; PRODUCT MARKET COMPETITION; CORPORATE GOVERNANCE; INSTITUTIONAL INVESTORS; INFORMATION-CONTENT; EARNINGS; TRADES; FIRM; EXTERNALITIES; RESTRICTIONS; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2023.102389
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
This study identifies a new economic benefit of common institutional ownership, which refers to the increasingly contentious phenomenon of U.S. firms sharing stockholders with their industry competitors. We find a significantly negative relation between common ownership and insider trading profitability. The disciplinary effect of common ownership on opportunistic insider trading is particularly evident when the information effects of common ownership are greater, when common owners are more likely to benefit from positive governance externalities, and in the subset of trades made by opportunistic insiders. Using the exogenous variations in common ownership induced by financial institution mergers, we conduct a difference-in-differences analysis and find consistent results. We also provide evidence that common owners encourage firms to impose ex-ante restrictions on insider trading and take ex-post actions to discipline opportunistic insiders by voting against management. Overall, our findings suggest that common institutional shareholders have information advantages, governance incentives, and effective means to constrain opportunistic insider trading.
引用
收藏
页数:30
相关论文
共 50 条
[11]   Does social trust mitigate insiders' opportunistic behaviors? Evidence from insider trading [J].
Tian, Yonggang ;
Ang, James S. ;
Fu, Panpan ;
Ma, Chaoqun ;
Wang, Xiuhua .
GLOBAL FINANCE JOURNAL, 2024, 59
[12]   Corporate social responsibility and insider trading profitability: Evidence from an emerging market [J].
Li, Tao ;
Wang, Yan ;
Li, Haomin .
PACIFIC-BASIN FINANCE JOURNAL, 2023, 77
[13]   Key audit matters and insider trading profitability: Evidence from China [J].
Liu, Hui ;
Chang, Yufan ;
Zuo, Man .
JOURNAL OF CONTEMPORARY ACCOUNTING & ECONOMICS, 2023, 19 (03)
[14]   Does exposure to product market competition influence insider trading profitability? [J].
Rahman, Dewan ;
Kabir, Muhammad ;
Oliver, Barry .
JOURNAL OF CORPORATE FINANCE, 2021, 66
[15]   Common institutional ownership and opportunistic insider selling: Evidence from China [J].
Dai, Jingwen ;
Xu, Rong ;
Zhu, Tianqi ;
Lu, Chao .
PACIFIC-BASIN FINANCE JOURNAL, 2024, 88
[16]   Ownership Structure and Insider Trading: Evidence from China [J].
Qing He ;
Oliver M. Rui .
Journal of Business Ethics, 2016, 134 :553-574
[17]   The information content of managerial insider trading: evidence from analyst forecasts [J].
Esqueda, Omar ;
Ngo, Thanh ;
Wang, Daphne .
ASIAN REVIEW OF ACCOUNTING, 2021, 29 (03) :332-361
[18]   Common ownership and executive pay-for-performance sensitivity: Evidence from China [J].
Xu, Tianli ;
Xu, Longbing ;
Zhu, Siyuan .
RESEARCH IN INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS AND FINANCE, 2023, 65
[19]   Does institutional monitoring matter? Evidence from insider trading by information risk level [J].
Chung, Chune Young ;
Kang, Sanggyu ;
Ryu, Doojin .
INVESTMENT ANALYSTS JOURNAL, 2018, 47 (01) :48-64
[20]   The power of not trading: Evidence from index fund ownership [J].
Rawson, Caleb ;
Rowe, Stephen P. .
REVIEW OF ACCOUNTING STUDIES, 2024, 29 (01) :388-422