The interactive influence of public service motivation, perceived reward equity, and prosocial impact on employee engagement: a panel study in Pakistan

被引:27
作者
Bashir, Mohsin [1 ]
Wright, Bradley E. [2 ]
Hassan, Shahidul [3 ]
机构
[1] Lahore Univ Management Sci, Lahore, Pakistan
[2] Ohio State Univ, Columbus, OH USA
[3] Univ Georgia, Dept Publ Adm & Policy, Athens, GA 30602 USA
关键词
Public service motivation; reward equity; prosocial impact; work engagement; PERSON-ORGANIZATION FIT; PERFORMANCE-RELATED PAY; WORK ENGAGEMENT; JOB DEMANDS; TRANSFORMATIONAL LEADERSHIP; ATTRACTION-SELECTION; SOCIETAL IMPACT; RED-TAPE; MANAGEMENT; SECTOR;
D O I
10.1080/14719037.2021.2013069
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
We examine independent and joint influences of public service motivation (PSM), job prosocial impact, and job reward equity on public employee engagement. Using panel data collected from 56 public managers in Pakistan, we find that managers with high levels of PSM feel more engaged when they experience high reward equity but job prosocial impact or when they experience high job prosocial impact but low reward equity. Managers with low to moderate levels of PSM, however, report being more engaged when both job reward equity and job prosocial impact are high. These findings provide a nuanced understanding of how PSM affects public employee engagement.
引用
收藏
页码:1213 / 1237
页数:25
相关论文
共 99 条
[11]   Performance-Related Pay and the Crowding Out of Motivation in the Public Sector: A Randomized Field Experiment [J].
Belle, Nicola .
PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION REVIEW, 2015, 75 (02) :230-241
[13]   Experimental Evidence on the Relationship between Public Service Motivation and Job Performance [J].
Belle, Nicola .
PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION REVIEW, 2013, 73 (01) :143-153
[14]   Toward Understanding Work Motivation Worker Attitudes and the Perception of Effective Public Service [J].
Boardman, Craig ;
Sundquist, Eric .
AMERICAN REVIEW OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION, 2009, 39 (05) :519-535
[15]   The Attitudinal, Behavioral, and Performance Outcomes of Work Engagement: A Comparative Meta-Analysis Across the Public, Semipublic, and Private Sector [J].
Borst, Rick T. ;
Kruyen, Peter M. ;
Lako, Christiaan J. ;
de Vries, Michiel S. .
REVIEW OF PUBLIC PERSONNEL ADMINISTRATION, 2020, 40 (04) :613-640
[16]   Exploring the Job Demands-Resources Model of Work Engagement in Government: Bringing in a Psychological Perspective [J].
Borst, Rick T. ;
Kruyen, Peter M. ;
Lako, Christiaan J. .
REVIEW OF PUBLIC PERSONNEL ADMINISTRATION, 2019, 39 (03) :372-397
[17]   Comparing Work Engagement in People-Changing and People-Processing Service Providers: A Mediation Model With Red Tape, Autonomy, Dimensions of PSM, and Performance [J].
Borst, Rick T. .
PUBLIC PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT, 2018, 47 (03) :287-313
[18]   Human resource management in the public and private sectors: An empirical comparison [J].
Boyne, G ;
Jenkins, G ;
Poole, M .
PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION, 1999, 77 (02) :407-420
[19]   Work motivation and public service motivation: disentangling varieties of motivation and job satisfaction [J].
Breaugh, Jessica ;
Ritz, Adrian ;
Alfes, Kerstin .
PUBLIC MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2018, 20 (10) :1423-1443
[20]  
Bright L., 2007, Review of Public Personnel Administration, V27, P361, DOI DOI 10.1177/0734371X07307149