Ultrasound-guided percutaneous opening of the A1 pulley with surgical knife on anterograde versus retrograde approach: A comparative cadaver study (40 fingers)

被引:2
作者
Pages, Laure [1 ]
Cambon, Adeline [2 ]
机构
[1] Clin Drouot Laffitte Sport & Arthrose, Chirurg Orthoped & Traumatol Membre Super, 20 Rue Laffitte, F-75009 Paris, France
[2] Sorbonne Univ, St Antoine Hosp, Orthopaed Trauma & Hand Surg, Paris, France
关键词
Trigger finger; A1; pulley; Ultrasound; Tenolysis; Surgical knife; Percutaneous surgery; TRIGGER-FINGER; RELEASE; NEEDLE; EFFICACY; SAFETY;
D O I
10.1016/j.hansur.2023.07.014
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: Trigger finger is one of the most common pathologies of the finger flexor mechanism. Previous studies have shown the value of ultrasound-guided percutaneous tenolysis. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of anterograde versus retrograde percutaneous ultrasound-guided tenolysis. Materials and methods: This was a comparative cadaver study performed between December 2021 and April 2022 in France, with 40 fresh cadaver fingers. Thumbs were excluded. A single surgeon performed 20 ultrasound-guided anterograde releases and 20 ultrasound-guided retrograde releases, using a second-generation minimally invasive surgical knife, and a multipurpose linear ultrasound transducer. The primary endpoint was the success of ultrasound-guided release, defined as complete opening of the A1 pulley along its entire length. Results: The success rate was 90% in the retrograde group and 95% in the anterograde group (non-significant difference: p = 0.56). There was no significant difference in superficial flexor tendon slip injuries or partial A2 pulley injuries. There were no neurovascular pedicle lesions. Conclusion: The choice of anterograde or retrograde ultrasound-guided tenolysis should be left to the surgeon's discretion. (c) 2023 SFCM. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:512 / 516
页数:5
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]  
Bain, 1999, Hand Surg, V4, P45, DOI 10.1142/S0218810400000113
[2]   Ultrasound Features of Trigger Finger: Review of the Literature [J].
Bianchi, Stefano ;
Gitto, Salvatore ;
Draghi, Ferdinando .
JOURNAL OF ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE, 2019, 38 (12) :3141-3154
[3]   Anatomic Outcome of Percutaneous Release Among Patients With Trigger Finger [J].
Calleja, Henry ;
Tanchuling, Antonio ;
Alagar, David ;
Tapia, Carolina ;
Macalalad, Anna .
JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2010, 35A (10) :1671-1674
[4]   Percutaneous treatment of trigger finger - 34 fingers followed 0.5-2 years [J].
Cihantimur, B ;
Akin, S ;
Ozcan, M .
ACTA ORTHOPAEDICA SCANDINAVICA, 1998, 69 (02) :167-168
[5]  
Cromheecke Michiel, 2022, Tech Hand Up Extrem Surg, V26, P103, DOI 10.1097/BTH.0000000000000367
[6]  
Croutzet E, 2016, Hand Surg Rehabil.
[7]   Percutaneous trigger finger release: A comparison of a new push knife and a 19-gauge needle in a cadaveric model [J].
Dunn, MJ ;
Pess, GM .
JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 1999, 24A (04) :860-865
[8]   PERCUTANEOUS RELEASE OF THE TRIGGER FINGER - AN OFFICE PROCEDURE [J].
EASTWOOD, DM ;
GUPTA, KJ ;
JOHNSON, DP .
JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 1992, 17A (01) :114-117
[9]   Anatomical Study of the A1 Pulley: Length and Location by Means of Cutaneous Landmarks on the Palmar Surface [J].
Fiorini, Harold J. ;
Santos, Joao B. G. ;
Hirakawa, Celso K. ;
Sato, Edson S. ;
Faloppa, Flavio ;
Albertoni, Walter M. .
JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2011, 36A (03) :464-468
[10]   Minimally invasive thread trigger digit release: a preliminary report on 34 digits of the adult hands [J].
Guo, Danqing ;
McCool, Logan ;
Senk, Alexander ;
Tonkin, Brionn ;
Guo, Joseph ;
Lytie, Rachel M. ;
Guo, Danzhu .
JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-EUROPEAN VOLUME, 2018, 43 (09) :942-947