Efficacy and Safety of Cold Snare Polypectomy of Colorectal Polyps 10-15 mm with a Hybrid Snare: A Prospective Observational Pilot Study

被引:0
作者
Ulrich, Joerg D. [1 ]
Rechberger, Paul [1 ]
Bachmann, Jeannine [2 ]
Herner, Alexander [3 ]
V. Figura, Guido [4 ]
Lahmer, Tobias [1 ]
Phillip, Veit [1 ]
Mayr, Ulrich [1 ]
Haller, Bernhard [5 ]
Jesinghaus, Moritz [6 ]
Schmid, Roland M. [1 ]
Abdelhafez, Mohamed [1 ]
Schlag, Christoph [3 ]
机构
[1] Tech Univ Munich, Dept Internal Med 2, Klinikum Rechts Isar, Munich, Germany
[2] Tech Univ Munich, Dept Surg, Klinikum Rechts Isar, Munich, Germany
[3] Univ Spital Zurich, Dept Gastroenterol & Hepatol, Zurich, Switzerland
[4] Private Practice Gastroenterol & Endoscopy, Munich, Germany
[5] Tech Univ Munich, Inst & Informat Med, Sch Med, Munich, Germany
[6] Philipps Univ Marburg, Inst Pathol, Marburg, Germany
关键词
Colorectal adenoma; Cold snare polypectomy; Colonoscopy; Prospective observational study; ENDOSCOPIC MUCOSAL RESECTION; EUROPEAN-SOCIETY; CANCERS; METAANALYSIS; COLONOSCOPY; VALIDATION; ADENOMAS;
D O I
10.1159/000530642
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction: Cold snare polypectomy (CSP) is a safe and effective procedure for small colorectal polyps & LE;9 mm. There are only limited data regarding CSP of larger neoplastic lesions. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of CSP for polyps between 10 and 15 mm in size. Methods: In this prospective single-arm observational pilot study, patients with a least one polyp 10-15 mm were included. These polyps were preferably removed by CSP using a dedicated hybrid snare. The primary outcome was the histological complete resection rate (CRR) determined by pathologically negative margins of the specimen and no neoplastic tissue obtained from biopsies of the resection site margin. Secondary outcomes were en bloc resection rate, failure of CSP, and incidence of adverse events. Results: A total of 61 neoplastic polyps were removed from 39 patients. Overall CRR was 80.3% (49/61). CSP was feasible in 78.7% (48/61) of polyps and the CRR in this group was 85.4% (41/48). When CSP failed (13/61; 21.3%), lesions were successfully resected by immediate HSP using the same snare with a CRR of 61.5% (8/13) in this group. One patient presented delayed hemorrhage after HSP of a polyp but successful hemostasis was achieved with two hemoclips. No other adverse events occurred. No recurrence was seen on follow-up colonoscopy in cases with incomplete resected polyps. Conclusion: CSP seems to be efficient and safe in removing colorectal polyps up to 15 mm. A hybrid snare seems to be particularly advantageous for these polyps as it allows immediate conversion to HSP if CSP might fail in larger polyps. This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04464837).
引用
收藏
页码:391 / 399
页数:9
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2003, GASTROINTEST ENDOSC, V58, pS3
[2]   Systematic review and meta-analysis of endoscopic submucosal dissection vs endoscopic mucosal resection for colorectal lesions [J].
Arezzo, Alberto ;
Passera, Roberto ;
Marchese, Nicola ;
Galloro, Giuseppe ;
Manta, Raffaele ;
Cirocchi, Roberto .
UNITED EUROPEAN GASTROENTEROLOGY JOURNAL, 2016, 4 (01) :18-29
[3]   Once-only flexible sigmoidoscopy screening in prevention of colorectal cancer: a multicentre randomised controlled trial [J].
Atkin, Wendy S. ;
Edwards, Rob ;
Kralj-Hans, Ines ;
Wooldrage, Kate ;
Hart, Andrew R. ;
Northover, John M. A. ;
Parkin, D. Max ;
Wardle, Jane ;
Duffy, Stephen W. ;
Cuzick, Jack .
LANCET, 2010, 375 (9726) :1624-1633
[4]   An audit of sample sizes for pilot and feasibility trials being undertaken in the United Kingdom registered in the United Kingdom Clinical Research Network database [J].
Billingham, Sophie A. M. ;
Whitehead, Amy L. ;
Julious, Steven A. .
BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 2013, 13
[5]   Cold snare endoscopic resection of nonpedunculated colorectal polyps larger than 10 mm: a systematic review and pooled-analysis [J].
Chandrasekar, Viveksandeep Thoguluva ;
Spadaccini, Marco ;
Aziz, Muhammad ;
Maselli, Roberta ;
Hassan, Seemeen ;
Fuccio, Lorenzo ;
Duvvuri, Abhiram ;
Frazzoni, Leonardo ;
Desai, Madhav ;
Fugazza, Alessandro ;
Jegadeesan, Ramprasad ;
Colombo, Matteo ;
Dasari, Chandra Skekhar ;
Hassan, Cesare ;
Sharma, Prateek ;
Repici, Alessandro .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2019, 89 (05) :929-+
[6]   Prophylactic clips to reduce delayed polypectomy bleeding after resection of large colorectal polyps: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials [J].
Chen, Binrui ;
Du, Lijun ;
Luo, Liang ;
Cen, Mengsha ;
Kim, John J. .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2021, 93 (04) :807-815
[7]   Efficacy and safety of cold versus hot snare polypectomy for small (5-9 mm) colorectal polyps: a multicenter randomized controlled trial [J].
de Benito Sanz, Marina ;
Hernandez, Luis ;
Garcia Martinez, Maria Isabel ;
Diez-Redondo, Pilar ;
Joao Matias, Diana ;
Gonzalez-Santiago, Jesus M. ;
Ibanez, Mercedes ;
Nunez Rodriguez, Maria Henar ;
Cimavilla, Marta ;
Tafur, Carla ;
Mata, Laura ;
Guardiola-Arevalo, Antonio ;
Feito, Jorge ;
Javier Garcia-Alonso, Francisco .
ENDOSCOPY, 2022, 54 (01) :35-44
[8]   Cold snare polypectomy: Does snare type influence outcomes? [J].
Din, Said ;
Ball, Alex J. ;
Riley, Stuart A. ;
Kitsanta, Panagiota ;
Johal, Shawinder .
DIGESTIVE ENDOSCOPY, 2015, 27 (05) :603-608
[9]   A Prospective Comparison of Cold Snare Polypectomy Using Traditional or Dedicated Cold Snares for the Resection of Small Sessile Colorectal Polyps [J].
Dwyer, Jeremy ;
Tan, Jonathan C. ;
Urquhart, Paul ;
Secomb, Robyn ;
Bunn, Catherine ;
Reynolds, John ;
La Nauze, Richard ;
Kemp, William ;
Roberts, Stuart K. ;
Brown, Gregor J. .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2016, 83 (05) :AB381-AB381
[10]   Colorectal cancers found after a complete colonoscopy [J].
Farrar, William D. ;
Sawhney, Mandeep S. ;
Nelson, Douglas B. ;
Lederle, Frank A. ;
Bond, John H. .
CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2006, 4 (10) :1259-1264