Does Service Trade Liberalization Promote Service Productivity? Evidence from China

被引:1
作者
Fu, Xin [1 ]
Wang, Tangyou [2 ]
Yang, Hongxu [3 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Int Trade & Econ Cooperat, Beijing 100710, Peoples R China
[2] Cent Univ Finance & Econ, Sch Finance, Beijing 100081, Peoples R China
[3] Cent Univ Finance & Econ, Sch Int Trade & Econ, Beijing 100081, Peoples R China
关键词
service trade liberalization; service productivity; innovation pilot city policy of service trade liberalization; FOREIGN DIRECT-INVESTMENT; INTERNATIONAL-TRADE; MANUFACTURING FIRMS; TECHNOLOGY SPILLOVERS; IMPACT; GROWTH; POLICY; EFFICIENCY; BARRIERS;
D O I
10.3390/su15086440
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This paper investigates the effects of service trade liberalization on service productivity. Based on a city-level database from 2006 to 2019, we estimate the labor productivity of the service industry and show the varying trends of productivity growth. Additionally, by exploiting the cross-city, cross-time variation at the time of China's innovation pilot city policy of service trade liberalization, we employ a difference-in-difference strategy to estimate the effects. The empirical evidence suggests that liberalizing the service trade has a positive effect on service productivity. In addition, the evidence indicates that service trade liberalization could increase the productivity of the service industry in cities located in the eastern and central parts of China, as well as in those cities with a higher degree of marketization. The main influencing channels of service trade liberalization on productivity predominantly occur through the increase in technology spillover, market competition, and human capital. China's evidence highlights the positive relationship between trade liberalization and productivity in the service industry and provides implications for realizing the sustainable development of services in developing countries; therefore, China and other developing countries are suggested to continuously formulate and deepen their service trade liberalization strategy.
引用
收藏
页数:22
相关论文
共 69 条
  • [1] Trade liberalization, intermediate inputs, and productivity: Evidence from Indonesia
    Amiti, Mary
    Konings, Jozef
    [J]. AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2007, 97 (05) : 1611 - 1638
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2011, POLICY REWORKING P
  • [3] One way to the top: How services boost the demand for goods
    Ariu, Andrea
    Mayneris, Florian
    Parenti, Mathieu
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL ECONOMICS, 2020, 123
  • [4] The interconnections between services and goods trade at the firm-level
    Ariu, Andrea
    Breinlich, Holger
    Corcos, Gregory
    Mion, Girdani
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL ECONOMICS, 2019, 116 : 173 - 188
  • [5] Does services liberalization benefit manufacturing firms? Evidence from the Czech Republic
    Arnold, Jens M.
    Javorcik, Beata S.
    Mattoo, Aaditya
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL ECONOMICS, 2011, 85 (01) : 136 - 146
  • [6] Services Reform and Manufacturing Performance: Evidence from India
    Arnold, Jens Matthias
    Javorcik, Beata
    Lipscomb, Molly
    Mattoo, Aaditya
    [J]. ECONOMIC JOURNAL, 2016, 126 (590) : 1 - 39
  • [7] The China Shock: Learning from Labor-Market Adjustment to Large Changes in Trade
    Autor, David H.
    Dorn, David
    Hanson, Gordon H.
    [J]. ANNUAL REVIEW OF ECONOMICS, VOL 8, 2016, 8 : 205 - 240
  • [8] The Growth of Low-Skill Service Jobs and the Polarization of the US Labor Market
    Autor, David H.
    Dorn, David
    [J]. AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2013, 103 (05) : 1553 - 1597
  • [9] Does services liberalization affect manufacturing firms' export performance? Evidence from India
    Bas, Maria
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE ECONOMICS, 2014, 42 (03) : 569 - 589
  • [10] Baumol WJ, 1967, AM ECON REV, V57, P415