Inter-comparison and integration of different soil moisture downscaling methods over the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau

被引:29
作者
Shangguan, Yulin [1 ]
Min, Xiaoxiao [1 ]
Shi, Zhou [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Zhejiang Univ, Inst Agr Remote Sensing & Informat Technol Applica, Coll Environm & Resource Sci, Hangzhou 310058, Peoples R China
[2] Minist Agr, Key Lab Spect Sensing, Hangzhou 310058, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Soil moisture; Downscaling; Machine learning; Integration; Inter-comparison; The Qinghai-Tibet Plateau; LAND-SURFACE TEMPERATURE; AMSR-E; SMAP; PRODUCTS; SMOS; RETRIEVALS; SCALE; REFLECTANCE; PERFORMANCE; VALIDATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.jhydrol.2022.129014
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Soil moisture (SM) is a key state variable in the water, energy cycle between atmosphere and land surface but existing passive microwave soil moisture products typically have spatial resolutions of tens of kilometers, which fails to meet the requirements of regional applications. Even though numerous machine/deep learning methods have been applied to downscale SM, few studies have investigated the performance differences of diverse approaches and attempted to integrate various methods to improve downscaling accuracy. Therefore, this study firstly evaluated and inter-compared the downscaling performances of six machine/deep learning approaches and further proposed a hybrid downscaling method based on Bayesian three-cornered hat merging (MATCH). The daily 1 km seamless soil moisture product during 2015-2019 over the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau was then obtained. Evaluation and inter-comparison results revealed that there was obvious performance discrepancy among different downscaling approaches and the gradient boosting decision tree (GBDT) and random forest (RF) were the best two methods, which performed best in the southern and eastern of the plateau, respectively. While the artificial neural network (ANN) outperformed other approaches in the northwestern areas. Validation against in-situ measurements showed that compared with SMAP SM, the MATCH SM exhibited comparable accuracy and lower error with mean R and ubRMSE values of 0.55 and 0.047 m3/m3. The mean R and ubRMSE values for SMAP SM were 0.67 and 0.056 m3/m3, respectively. In addition, the MATCH SM presented great improvement compared with any single downscaled SM data, having the highest correlation and the lowest ubRMSE scores. While, among different methods, the highest R was 0.50 (GBDT) and the lowest ubRMSE was 0.052 m3/m3 (residual network (ResNet)). Besides, the downscaled SM could accurately reflect the temporal variations of soil moisture and precipitation, and effectively represent the spatial patterns of soil moisture. Satisfactory downscaling results were achieved in arid and semi-arid areas whereas a certain degree of overestimation still existed in the eastern and southeastern regions with dense vegetation and high moisture conditions. Such overestimation was inherent from original SMAP SM but was mitigated after downscaling. In conclusion, performance differences existed among diverse downscaling approaches and the developed MATCH method could maximize the potentials of each method and show encouraging downscaling performances.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 109 条
  • [1] Downscaling SMAP Radiometer Soil Moisture Over the CONUS Using an Ensemble Learning Method
    Abbaszadeh, Peyman
    Moradkhani, Hamid
    Zhan, Xiwu
    [J]. WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2019, 55 (01) : 324 - 344
  • [2] Generating surface soil moisture at 30 m spatial resolution using both data fusion and machine learning toward better water resources management at the field scale
    Abowarda, Ahmed Samir
    Bai, Liangliang
    Zhang, Caijin
    Long, Di
    Li, Xueying
    Huang, Qi
    Sun, Zhangli
    [J]. REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, 2021, 255
  • [3] Review of Machine Learning Approaches for Biomass and Soil Moisture Retrievals from Remote Sensing Data
    Ali, Iftikhar
    Greifeneder, Felix
    Stamenkovic, Jelena
    Neumann, Maxim
    Notarnicola, Claudia
    [J]. REMOTE SENSING, 2015, 7 (12) : 16398 - 16421
  • [4] Validation of SMAP Soil Moisture at Terrestrial National Ecological Observatory Network (NEON) Sites Show Potential for Soil Moisture Retrieval in Forested Areas
    Ayres, Edward
    Colliander, Andreas
    Cosh, Michael H.
    Roberti, Joshua A.
    Simkin, Sam
    Genazzio, Melissa A.
    [J]. IEEE JOURNAL OF SELECTED TOPICS IN APPLIED EARTH OBSERVATIONS AND REMOTE SENSING, 2021, 14 : 10903 - 10918
  • [5] Initial soil moisture retrievals from the METOP-A Advanced Scatterometer (ASCAT)
    Bartalis, Zoltan
    Wagner, Wolfgang
    Naeimi, Vahid
    Hasenauer, Stefan
    Scipal, Klaus
    Bonekamp, Hans
    Figa, Julia
    Anderson, Craig
    [J]. GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2007, 34 (20)
  • [6] Random forests
    Breiman, L
    [J]. MACHINE LEARNING, 2001, 45 (01) : 5 - 32
  • [7] Soil moisture estimation through ASCAT and AMSR-E sensors: An intercomparison and validation study across Europe
    Brocca, L.
    Hasenauer, S.
    Lacava, T.
    Melone, F.
    Moramarco, T.
    Wagner, W.
    Dorigo, W.
    Matgen, P.
    Martinez-Fernandez, J.
    Llorens, P.
    Latron, J.
    Martin, C.
    Bittelli, M.
    [J]. REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, 2011, 115 (12) : 3390 - 3408
  • [8] Spatial-temporal variability of soil moisture and its estimation across scales
    Brocca, L.
    Melone, F.
    Moramarco, T.
    Morbidelli, R.
    [J]. WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2010, 46
  • [9] Soil as a natural rain gauge: Estimating global rainfall from satellite soil moisture data
    Brocca, Luca
    Ciabatta, Luca
    Massari, Christian
    Moramarco, Tommaso
    Hahn, Sebastian
    Hasenauer, Stefan
    Kidd, Richard
    Dorigo, Wouter
    Wagner, Wolfgang
    Levizzani, Vincenzo
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 2014, 119 (09) : 5128 - 5141
  • [10] Carlson T.N., 1994, Remote Sens. Rev, V9, P161, DOI [DOI 10.1080/02757259409532220, 10.1080/02757259409532220]