Reducing Social Stratification Bias in Referendum Participation: Evidence from the German Local Level

被引:0
作者
Velimsky, Jan A. [1 ,2 ]
Vetter, Angelika [1 ]
Baechtiger, Andre [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Germany
[2] Univ Stuttgart, Inst Social Sci, Breitscheidstr 2, D-70174 Stuttgart, Germany
关键词
direct democracy; referendum; unequal participation; local democracy; Germany; DIRECT DEMOCRACY; VOTER TURNOUT; UNEQUAL PARTICIPATION; ELECTORAL TURNOUT; INCOME INEQUALITY; ELECTIONS; MOBILIZATION; METAANALYSIS; INITIATIVES; MODELS;
D O I
10.1177/10659129241230901
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
Political participation is socially distorted: Socio-economic resources affecting the probability of individuals becoming politically active question the principle of political equality. Such inequality in participation based on social stratification is well documented for elections, while research on inequality in referendum participation is still scarce. Based on the observation that such inequality varies between referendums, this paper explores referendum-specific contextual factors that may affect socially distorted referendum participation. We leverage information from an original dataset covering 1788 districts in 35 German municipalities for 68 local referendums held between 2000 and 2019. The results of our multilevel models indicate that concurrent first-order elections boost referendum turnout and decrease social stratification, while the closeness of the decision increases turnout but does not affect stratification bias. Moreover, we find a curvilinear relationship between turnout and stratification, with stratification only diminishing from participation levels above 40-50%.
引用
收藏
页码:577 / 591
页数:15
相关论文
共 89 条
  • [1] Does an Active Use of Mechanisms of Direct Democracy Impact Electoral Participation? Evidence from the U.S. States and the Swiss Cantons
    Altman, David
    [J]. LOCAL GOVERNMENT STUDIES, 2013, 39 (06) : 739 - 755
  • [2] Social Inequality in Political Participation: The Dark Sides of Individualisation
    Armingeon, Klaus
    Schaedel, Lisa
    [J]. WEST EUROPEAN POLITICS, 2015, 38 (01) : 1 - 27
  • [3] The local roots of the participation gap: Inequality and voter turnout
    Bartle, John
    Birch, Sarah
    Skirmuntt, Mariana
    [J]. ELECTORAL STUDIES, 2017, 48 : 30 - 44
  • [4] Electoral reforms and the representativeness of turnout
    Bechtel, Michael M.
    Schmid, Lukas
    [J]. POLITICAL SCIENCE RESEARCH AND METHODS, 2021, 9 (03) : 485 - 499
  • [5] Does Compulsory Voting Increase Support for Leftist Policy?
    Bechtel, Michael M.
    Hangartner, Dominik
    Schmid, Lukas
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE, 2016, 60 (03) : 752 - 767
  • [6] Improving Tests of Theories Positing Interaction
    Berry, William D.
    Golder, Matt
    Milton, Daniel
    [J]. JOURNAL OF POLITICS, 2012, 74 (03) : 653 - 671
  • [7] Best Volker, 2023, Demokratievertrauen. Wie blicken die Menschen in Deutschland auf Politik, Institutionen und Gesellschaft?
  • [8] Core and Peripheral Voters: Predictors of Turnout Across Three Types of Elections
    Bhatti, Yosef
    Dahlgaard, Jens Olav
    Hansen, Jonas Hedegaard
    Hansen, Kasper M.
    [J]. POLITICAL STUDIES, 2019, 67 (02) : 348 - 366
  • [9] What affects voter turnout?
    Blais, Andre
    [J]. ANNUAL REVIEW OF POLITICAL SCIENCE, 2006, 9 : 111 - 125
  • [10] Understanding interaction models: Improving empirical analyses
    Brambor, T
    Clark, WR
    Golder, M
    [J]. POLITICAL ANALYSIS, 2006, 14 (01) : 63 - 82