Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy and Atrial Fibrillation: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Anticoagulation Strategy

BackgroundAtrial fibrillation (AF) frequently complicates hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM), and anticoagulation significantly decreases the risk of stroke in this population. To date, no randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have compared direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) and vitamin K antagonists (VKAs). The present study aimed to systematically compare the two anticoagulation strategies in terms of effectiveness and safety.MethodWe performed a systematic literature search and meta-analysis in the PubMed, MEDLINE, and EMBASE databases for studies reporting all-cause mortality, major bleeding, or thromboembolic events (TEs). Since no RCTs were available, we included observational studies only. The overall hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) for each analyzed parameter were pooled using a random-effects model.ResultsFive observational studies including 6919 patients were eligible for inclusion. Compared with VKAs, DOACs were associated with statistically significant lower rates of all-cause mortality (HR 0.64, 95% CI 0.35-0.54; p < 0.00001), comparable major bleeding events (HR 0.64, 95% CI 0.40-1.03; p = 0.07), and TEs (HR 0.94, 95% CI 0.73-1.22; p = 0.65).ConclusionsCompared with VKAs, a DOAC-based strategy might represent an effective and safe strategy regarding all-cause mortality, major/life-threatening bleeding complications, and TEs in HCM patients with concomitant AF. However, further prospective studies are necessary to reinforce a DOAC-based anticoagulation strategy in this population.