Do Sit-Stand Tables Affect Physical Behavior and Body Composition Similarly in Normal-Weight and Overweight Office Workers? A Pilot Study

被引:1
作者
Barbieri, Dechristian Franca [1 ,2 ]
Brusaca, Luiz Augusto [2 ]
Mathiassen, Svend Erik [3 ]
Oliveira, Ana Beatriz [2 ]
Srinivasan, Divya [1 ]
机构
[1] Clemson Univ, Dept Ind Engn, Clemson, SC 29634 USA
[2] Univ Fed Sao Carlos, Dept Phys Therapy, Lab Clin & Occupat Kinesiol, Sao Carlos, Brazil
[3] Univ Gavle, Ctr Musculoskeletal Res, Dept Occupat Hlth Sci & Psychol, Gavle, Sweden
来源
IISE TRANSACTIONS ON OCCUPATIONAL ERGONOMICS & HUMAN FACTORS | 2023年 / 11卷 / 3-4期
基金
巴西圣保罗研究基金会;
关键词
Sedentary behavior; compositional data analysis; DXA; ENERGY-EXPENDITURE; SITTING TIME; WORKSTATIONS; HEALTH; INTERVENTION; STATEMENT; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1080/24725838.2023.2281964
中图分类号
TB18 [人体工程学];
学科分类号
1201 ;
摘要
Sedentary behavior is a significant health concern among office workers. We completed the same 6-month sit-stand table intervention at work for groups of normal-weight and overweight workers, and compared it to not having sit-stand tables. The intervention caused the intended decrease in sitting time in both groups and a corresponding increase in standing. We did not find compensation effects on physical behavior outside of work. Furthermore, the intervention did not change the composition of fat, lean, and bone mass in either group. Thus, strategies including initiatives to increase physical activity are likely needed to have effects on body composition; and an intervention needs to be sustained for longer than six months for any changes in body composition to be observed. Background: A sit-stand table (SST) at work may help office workers shorten and break up sitting by periods of standing. However, it is not clear whether SST use influences sitting at and outside work to similar extents among normal-weight and overweight office workers, and whether it can change body composition. Purpose: To investigate if introducing SSTs affects physical behavior and body composition similarly in normal-weight and overweight office workers. Methods: In this pilot intervention study, physical behavior and body composition were evaluated and compared between normal-weight (n = 8) and overweight (n = 14) office workers, both before and after using an SST for 6 months. Time spent sitting, standing, and moving was recorded using a triaxial thigh accelerometer during work and leisure. Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry was used to determine fat, lean, and bone mass. Physical behavior and body composition data were both processed using compositional data analysis. Results: The intervention was similarly effective for normal weight and overweight workers in changing physical behavior during work, mainly by reducing sitting time and increasing standing time, while no effects were seen during leisure. We found no effect of the intervention on body composition. Conclusion: A sit-stand table intervention for 6 months changed physical behaviors at work to a similar extent among normal weight and overweight office workers. No compensatory behaviors were observed during leisure, and the intervention had no significant effects on body composition.
引用
收藏
页码:81 / 93
页数:13
相关论文
共 60 条
  • [1] Sit-Stand Workstations A Pilot Intervention to Reduce Office Sitting Time
    Alkhajah, Taleb A.
    Reeves, Marina M.
    Eakin, Elizabeth G.
    Winkler, Elisabeth A. H.
    Owen, Neville
    Healy, Genevieve N.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2012, 43 (03) : 298 - 303
  • [2] Barbieri Dechristian Franca, 2022, Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, P495, DOI 10.1177/1071181322661217
  • [3] Effects of Time in Sitting and Standing on Pleasantness, Acceptability, Fatigue, and Pain When Using a Sit-Stand Desk: An Experiment on Overweight and Normal-Weight Subjects
    Barbieri, Dechristian Franca
    Brusaca, Luiz Augusto
    Mathiassen, Svend Erik
    Oliveira, Ana Beatriz
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL ACTIVITY & HEALTH, 2020, 17 (12) : 1222 - 1230
  • [4] Barbieri DF, 2017, IISE T OCCUP ERG HUM, V5, P39, DOI 10.1080/24725838.2016.1259191
  • [5] The Energy Cost of Sitting versus Standing Naturally in Man
    Betts, James A.
    Smith, Harry A.
    Johnson-Bonson, Drusus A.
    Ellis, Tom I.
    Dagnall, Joseph
    Hengist, Aaron
    Carroll, Harriet
    Thompson, Dylan
    Gonzalez, Javier T.
    Afman, Gregg H.
    [J]. MEDICINE AND SCIENCE IN SPORTS AND EXERCISE, 2019, 51 (04) : 726 - 733
  • [6] The accuracy and precision of DXA for assessing body composition in team sport athletes
    Bilsborough, Johann Christopher
    Greenway, Kate
    Opar, David
    Livingstone, Steuart
    Cordy, Justin
    Coutts, Aaron James
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SPORTS SCIENCES, 2014, 32 (19) : 1821 - 1828
  • [7] Advanced body composition assessment: from body mass index to body composition profiling
    Borga, Magnus
    West, Janne
    Bell, Jimmy D.
    Harvey, Nicholas C.
    Romu, Thobias
    Heymsfield, Steven B.
    Leinhard, Olof Dahlqvist
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATIVE MEDICINE, 2018, 66 (05) : 887 - 895
  • [8] Evaluating the effectiveness of organisational-level strategies with or without an activity tracker to reduce office workers' sitting time: a cluster-randomised trial
    Brakenridge, C. L.
    Fjeldsoe, B. S.
    Young, D. C.
    Winkler, E. A. H.
    Dunstan, D. W.
    Straker, L. M.
    Healy, G. N.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL NUTRITION AND PHYSICAL ACTIVITY, 2016, 13
  • [9] The sedentary office: an expert statement on the growing case for change towards better health and productivity
    Buckley, John P.
    Hedge, Alan
    Yates, Thomas
    Copeland, Robert J.
    Loosemore, Michael
    Hamer, Mark
    Bradley, Gavin
    Dunstan, David W.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2015, 49 (21) : 1357 - 1362
  • [10] Energy Expenditure of Standing Compared to Sitting While Conducting Office Tasks
    Burns, Jill
    Forde, Cuisle
    Dockrell, Sara
    [J]. HUMAN FACTORS, 2017, 59 (07) : 1078 - 1087