Enacting institutional drivers towards strategic corporate social responsibility: The sensemaking process in multinational companies

被引:1
作者
Yudarwati, Gregoria A. [1 ,3 ]
Sison, Marianne D. [2 ]
Putranto, Ignatius A. [1 ]
Wiratsari, Putu [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Atma Jaya Yogyakarta, Commun Dept, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
[2] RMIT, Sch Media & Commun, Melbourne, Australia
[3] Univ Atma Jaya Yogyakarta, Jalan Babarsari 6, Sleman 55281, Indonesia
关键词
corporate social responsibility; microanalysis institution; multinational companies; sensemaking; CSR; SUBSIDIARIES; PERSPECTIVE;
D O I
10.1002/csr.2454
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Following sensemaking process, this study examines how CSR policy makers of multinational companies (MNCs) interpret institutional drivers, assign meanings on them, and enact them to reduce uncertainties in conducting CSR initiatives. Based on a case study towards Australia MNCs, this study reveals the sensemaking process towards two ecological changes: (1) the communities' expectations and culture and (2) different regulatory and governance standards between home and host countries. Local communities in host countries were believed of having power to express their expectations and demands to the companies. Nevertheless, the communities may not really hold power over the companies. Sensemaking process, however, is about "believing is seeing ", which tends to follow a self-fulfilling prophecy and self-validating prophecy. When the corporate leaders selected the interpretation, they created a story to make sense of what happened and to carry on the current activities. They then decided to act upon their interpretations by enacting CSR initiatives. When it came to formulating the CSR policy, they followed the top-down processing by following the home country's standards that had been applied in many different host countries. Meanwhile, when it came to its implementation, they followed the bottom-up processing to gain acceptance from the communities. This study asserts that their sense making choices, that is, how they provide meanings and reasonings to their institutions and how their rationalities are enacted, shape their companies' CSR initiatives.
引用
收藏
页码:1782 / 1793
页数:12
相关论文
共 83 条
[21]   Corporate Social Responsibility and Organizational Psychology: An Integrative Review [J].
Glavas, Ante .
FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2016, 7
[22]   Critical Essay: The reconciliation of fraternal twins: Integrating the psychological and sociological approaches to 'micro' corporate social responsibility [J].
Gond, Jean-Pascal ;
Moser, Christine .
HUMAN RELATIONS, 2021, 74 (01) :5-40
[23]  
Haack P, 2020, RES SOCIOL ORGAN-RES, V65, P11, DOI 10.1108/S0733-558X2019000065A005
[24]   Multinational Enterprise Subsidiaries and their CSR: A Conceptual Framework of the Management of CSR in Smaller Emerging Economies [J].
Hah, Kristin ;
Freeman, Susan .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 2014, 122 (01) :125-136
[25]   How Do Internal and External CSR Affect Employees' Organizational Identification? A Perspective from the Group Engagement Model [J].
Hameed, Imran ;
Riaz, Zahid ;
Arain, Ghulam A. ;
Farooq, Omer .
FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2016, 7
[26]  
Hardy Cynthia., 2017, The sage handbook of organizational institutionalism, P261
[27]  
Heath R.L., 2000, HUMAN COMMUNICATION
[28]   The determinants of MNE subsidiaries' political strategies: evidence of institutional duality [J].
Hillman, AJ ;
Wan, WP .
JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS STUDIES, 2005, 36 (03) :322-340
[29]   "Society is Out There, Organisation is in Here": On the Perceptions of Corporate Social Responsibility Held by Different Managerial Groups [J].
Hine, James A. H. S. ;
Preuss, Lutz .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 2009, 88 (02) :381-393
[30]  
Hofstede Insights, 2022, Country Comparison