Exploring the interrelations and driving factors among typical ecosystem services in the Yangtze river economic Belt, China

被引:23
|
作者
He, Liujie [1 ,2 ]
Xie, Zeyang [1 ,2 ]
Wu, Hanqing [3 ]
Liu, Zhong [4 ]
Zheng, Bofu [1 ,2 ,5 ]
Wan, Wei [1 ,2 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Nanchang Univ, Sch Resources & Environm, Key Lab Poyang Lake Environm & Resource Utilizat, Minist Educ, Nanchang 330031, Peoples R China
[2] Nanchang Univ, Jiangxi Inst Ecol Civilizat, Nanchang 330031, Peoples R China
[3] Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Subtrop Agr, Changsha 410125, Peoples R China
[4] China Agr Univ, Coll Land Sci & Technol, Beijing 100193, Peoples R China
[5] Nanchang Univ, Sch Resources & Environm, Qianhu Campus,999 Xuefu Ave, Nanchang 330031, Jiangxi, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Ecosystem services; Spatiotemporal feature; Social -ecological driver; Threshold; Bundle; Trade-offs and synergies; TRADE-OFFS; LANDSCAPE INDEX; CLIMATE-CHANGE; SYNERGIES; IMPACTS; ZONE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.119794
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Exploring the spatiotemporal characteristics of ecosystem services (ESs) and their drivers is crucial for managers to develop significant scientific policies that further sustainable development. We used the Yangtze River Eco-nomic Belt (YREB) to explore the trends, hotspots, and drivers of water yield (WY), soil conservation (SC), carbon sequestration (CS), and food supply (FS) between 2000 and 2020. Similarly, we analyzed relationships among ESs and drivers of the multiple ecosystem services landscape index (MESLI). We used the self-organizing map method to obtain the types and distribution of the ES bundles, revealing the bundles, trade-offs, and synergies among ESs. The four ESs had an increasing trend, with CS having the highest increase; ES hotspot analysis showed differences among upper, middle, and lower reaches. Constraint lines among ESs and drivers were diverse; the corresponding SC and WY reached thresholds when CS values were 1477.81 and 460.5 t km-2, respectively. When FS values were 67.34 and 86.17 x 104 Yuan & sdot;km-2, CS and WY reached their thresholds. All critical drivers of the four ESs were natural factors. The thresholds that the MESLI reached with driver status were 1000 mm (evapotranspiration), 2121 mm (precipitation), 2.42 degrees (slope), 1.46% (soil organic matter), 36.08% (sand), 30.75% (proportion of non-agricultural population), 18.57% (cropland proportion), 1.05 x 104 persons & sdot;km-2 (population density), and 84.84% (proportion of non-agricultural industries in total gross domestic product), respectively. FS, water supply, and ecological conservation bundles changed over the 20 years, and trade-offs and synergies among ESs within bundles differed. We revealed the complexity of ESs from multiple perspectives, which will enable the development of ecosystem management and conservation recommendations for the YREB and large-scale economic zones worldwide.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Exploring the Response of Ecosystem Services to Socioecological Factors in the Yangtze River Economic Belt, China
    Zhang, Zhiming
    Fang, Fengman
    Yao, Youru
    Ji, Qing
    Cheng, Xiaojing
    LAND, 2024, 13 (06)
  • [2] Constraint relationship of ecosystem services in the Yangtze River Economic Belt, China
    Zihui Li
    Dongjie Guan
    Lilei Zhou
    Yanjun Zhang
    Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2022, 29 : 12484 - 12505
  • [3] Constraint relationship of ecosystem services in the Yangtze River Economic Belt, China
    Li, Zihui
    Guan, Dongjie
    Zhou, Lilei
    Zhang, Yanjun
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2022, 29 (09) : 12484 - 12505
  • [4] Exploring the Driving Forces of Ecosystem Services in the Yangtze River Basin, China
    Wang, Zhenwei
    Mao, Jinjin
    Peng, Yelin
    Wu, Jiahui
    Wang, Xiaochun
    Su, Lilan
    LAND, 2025, 14 (02)
  • [5] Spatial differences of ecosystem services and their driving factors: A comparation analysis among three urban agglomerations in China's Yangtze River Economic Belt
    Luo, Qiaoling
    Zhou, Junfang
    Li, Zhigang
    Yu, Bolin
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2020, 725
  • [6] Trade-off and Synergy of Ecosystem Services in the Yangtze River Economic Belt and Its Driving Factors
    He L.-J.
    Zheng B.-F.
    Wan W.
    Xie Z.-A.
    Song X.
    Zhu J.-Q.
    Liu Z.
    Huanjing Kexue/Environmental Science, 2024, 45 (06): : 3318 - 3328
  • [7] Spatiotemporal Evolution and the Driving Force of Tourism Ecosystem Health in the Yangtze River Economic Belt, China
    Luo, Run
    Zhou, Nianxing
    Li, Zaijun
    POLISH JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES, 2022, 31 (04): : 3235 - 3248
  • [8] The spatial spillover effects of ecosystem services: A case study in Yangtze River economic belt in China
    Qu, Hongjiao
    You, Chang
    Feng, Chen-Chieh
    Guo, Luo
    ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2024, 168
  • [9] Strengthening the effectiveness of nature reserves in representing ecosystem services: The Yangtze River Economic Belt in China
    Xu, Xibao
    Jiang, Bo
    Chen, Minkun
    Bai, Yang
    Yang, Guishan
    LAND USE POLICY, 2020, 96
  • [10] Does China's Yangtze River Economic Belt policy impact on local ecosystem services?
    Luo, Qiaoling
    Luo, Yanlong
    Zhou, Qingfeng
    Song, Yan
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2019, 676 : 231 - 241