Assessing environmental, social and governance (ESG) performance of global electronics industry: an integrated MCDM approach-based spherical fuzzy sets

被引:11
作者
Hoang, Phi-Dinh [1 ]
Nguyen, Ly-Thi [1 ]
Tran, Binh-Quoc [1 ]
机构
[1] Vietnam Natl Univ, Hanoi Sch Business & Management, Hanoi, Vietnam
关键词
MCDM; spherical fuzzy; electronics industry; ESG; sustainability; DECISION-MAKING; SUSTAINABILITY; INVESTMENT; MANAGEMENT; SELECTION; RISK; ANP;
D O I
10.1080/23311916.2023.2297509
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
The integrity of environmental, social and governance (ESG) data in corporate sustainability reports is of heightened importance to socially responsible investors. This study aims to define essential ESG criteria influencing investment and assess corporate ESG performance. A novel method, combining Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Weighted Aggregated Sum Product Assessment (WASPAS) in a spherical fuzzy context, is introduced to address uncertainties linked to imprecision and subjectivity in ESG evaluations. Employing Spherical Fuzzy-AHP (SF-AHP) to determine evaluation criteria for global electronics companies, followed by Spherical Fuzzy-WASPAS (SF-WASPAS) to finalize rankings, this approach was examined within the global electronics industry. The research underscores the method's value in gauging ESG performance and guiding executives in investment decisions. Furthermore, comparative analysis (SF-WASPAS, SF-TOPSIS and Fermatean Fuzzy WASPAS) supports the framework's reliability, suggesting its applicability in resource management for attracting investors and enhancing stakeholder interaction. The results demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed SF-AHP-WASPAS method in assessing corporate ESG performance under uncertainty, providing executives with a robust decision-making framework for sustainable investment strategies.
引用
收藏
页数:21
相关论文
共 81 条
[1]   RETRACTED: An integrated neutrosophic ANP and VIKOR method for achieving sustainable supplier selection: A case study in importing field (Retracted article. See vol. 139, 2022) [J].
Abdel-Baset, M. ;
Chang, Victor ;
Gamal, Abduallah ;
Smarandache, Florentin .
COMPUTERS IN INDUSTRY, 2019, 106 :94-110
[2]   Environmental-, social-, and governance-related factors for business investment and sustainability: a scientometric review of global trends [J].
Ahmad, Hadiqa ;
Yaqub, Muhammad ;
Lee, Seung Hwan .
ENVIRONMENT DEVELOPMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY, 2024, 26 (02) :2965-2987
[3]  
Al-Dhahir Isabel, 2023, Decarbonizing the Electronics Industry with Sustainable Manufacturing
[4]   Corporate ESG reporting quantity, quality and performance: Where to now for environmental policy and practice? [J].
Arvidsson, Susanne ;
Dumay, John .
BUSINESS STRATEGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2022, 31 (03) :1091-1110
[5]   INTUITIONISTIC FUZZY-SETS [J].
ATANASSOV, KT .
FUZZY SETS AND SYSTEMS, 1986, 20 (01) :87-96
[6]  
Bain&Company, 2023, Do ESG Efforts Create Value?
[7]  
Ballestero E, 2015, INT SER OPER RES MAN, V219, P3, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-11836-9_1
[8]   An eco-critical perspective on business models: The value triangle as an approach to closing the sustainability gap [J].
Biloslavo, Roberto ;
Bagnoli, Carlo ;
Edgar, David .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2018, 174 :746-762
[9]  
British Safety Council, 2023, What is occupational health and safety?
[10]  
Business Ethics: Definition, 2023, Business ethics: Definition principles, why they're important