Work and social reproduction in rural India: Lessons from time-use data

被引:4
作者
Rao, Smriti [1 ]
Ramnarain, Smita [2 ]
Naidu, Sirisha [3 ]
Uppal, Anupama [4 ]
Mukherjee, Avanti [5 ]
机构
[1] Assumption Univ, Worcester, MA 01609 USA
[2] Univ Rhode Isl, Kingston, RI USA
[3] Univ Missouri, Kansas City, MO USA
[4] Punjabi Univ, Patiala, Punjab, India
[5] SUNY Coll Cortland, Cortland, NY USA
关键词
gender; India; labour; Punjab; time-use; POLITICAL-ECONOMY; LABOR; CRITIQUE; QUESTION; GENDER; SOUTH;
D O I
10.1111/joac.12569
中图分类号
F0 [经济学]; F1 [世界各国经济概况、经济史、经济地理]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
0201 ; 020105 ; 03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
Efforts to decentre/decolonize our understanding of capitalist development in the Global South call for more complex and differentiated categories of work that acknowledge the significance of both non-waged and reproductive labour. These categories would allow us to more clearly 'see' the varying intersections of gender, class and caste within this world of work. Even as the literature on work in the Global South acknowledges the importance of forms of non-waged work, there is still more work to be done to sufficiently incorporate the labour of social reproduction. In this paper, which emerges from an effort to apply a feminist social reproduction lens in the field, we propose understanding work through four conceptual dyads: waged productive labour, non-waged productive labour, waged reproductive labour and non-waged reproductive labour. Through an in-depth description of three specific cases from a time-use survey we conducted in rural Punjab, India, we argue not only that all four dyads are required to encompass the world of work but also that this more expansive conceptualization can help us produce richer analyses of the intersections of class, caste and gender.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 65 条
  • [1] Arruzza C, 2016, SCI SOC, V80, P9
  • [2] Baglioni E., 2020, POLITICAL EC WORK GL
  • [3] Rethinking power, production, and social reproduction: Toward variegated social reproduction
    Bakker, Isabella
    Gill, Stephen
    [J]. CAPITAL AND CLASS, 2019, 43 (04) : 503 - 523
  • [4] Banaji Jairus., 2013, THEORY HIST ESSAYS M
  • [5] Banks N., 2020, REV BLACK POLIT ECON, V47, P343, DOI DOI 10.1177/0034644620962811
  • [6] Bansal G., 2020, LAND STRUGGLE TIME P
  • [7] Basole A., 2016, HDB RES METHODS APPL, DOI [10.4337/9781782548461.00014, DOI 10.4337/9781782548461.00014]
  • [8] Farmers' protests in India: introduction to the JPS Forum
    Baviskar, Amita
    Levien, Michael
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PEASANT STUDIES, 2021, 48 (07) : 1341 - 1355
  • [9] Berik G., 1997, Feminist Economics, V3, P121, DOI DOI 10.1080/135457097338735
  • [10] Bernstein H, 2017, RUDN J SOCIOL, V17, P7