The how and why of handgrip strength assessment

被引:1
作者
Myles, Louise [1 ]
Massy-Westropp, Nicola [2 ]
Barnett, Fiona [3 ]
机构
[1] James Cook Univ, Coll Healthcare Sci, Townsville, Qld, Australia
[2] Univ South Australia, Sch Hlth Sci, Adelaide, SA, Australia
[3] James Cook Univ, Coll Healthcare Sci, 3 Sport & Exercise Sci, Townsville, Qld, Australia
关键词
Handgrip; assessment; testing protocol;
D O I
10.1177/03080226231208409
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
Introduction: Occupational therapists and physiotherapists routinely assess Hand grip Strength (HGS) to evaluate hand function. This study explored the experiences of clinicians who regularly assess and evaluate HGS including the testing protocol utilised, evaluation methods and the influence of various biological and functional factors. Method: This exploratory survey (n=49) was distributed online to members of the Australian Hand Therapy Association. The questionnaire asked recipients to identify HGS testing protocols, evaluation methods, use of normative data, reasons for assessment and the influence of biological and functional factors on HGS. Demographic data was also collected. Results: Sixty-four percent of respondents were occupational therapists and 59% had over 10years' experience assessing HGS. The standardised American Society of Hand Therapists (ASHT) testing protocol was consistently adopted by only 67% of respondents . Variations in contraction time, scoring and evaluation methods were identified. Gender, age, employment and lifestyle were considered the functional and biological factors which influence HGS. Conclusion: This study details how and why occupational therapists and physiotherapists in Australia assess and evaluate HGS. Use of the ASHT testing protocol is not universal. Clinicians rely on the reason for assessment, clinical experience and practice context to determine how they assess and evaluate HGS.
引用
收藏
页码:321 / 328
页数:8
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]   Age-related change in handgrip strength in men and women: is muscle quality a contributing factor? [J].
Abe, Takashi ;
Thiebaud, Robert S. ;
Loenneke, Jeremy P. .
AGE, 2016, 38 (01) :1-7
[2]  
AGNEW PJ, 1982, ARCH PHYS MED REHAB, V63, P269
[3]  
Agnihotri Arun Kumar, 2008, J Forensic Leg Med, V15, P479, DOI 10.1016/j.jflm.2008.03.002
[4]   Prediction of grip and key pinch strength in 978 healthy subjects [J].
Angst, Felix ;
Drerup, Susann ;
Werle, Stephan ;
Herren, Daniel B. ;
Simmen, Beat R. ;
Goldhahn, Joerg .
BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS, 2010, 11
[5]   A comparison of dominant and non-dominant hand strengths [J].
Armstrong, CA ;
Oldham, JA .
JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-BRITISH AND EUROPEAN VOLUME, 1999, 24B (04) :421-425
[6]  
Australian Bureau of Statistics, 2021, Australian statistical geography standard (ASGS)
[7]  
Bhat Anil K, 2021, J Clin Orthop Trauma, V21, P101504, DOI 10.1016/j.jcot.2021.101504
[8]   Reference values for adult grip strength measured with a Jamar dynamometer: a descriptive meta-analysis [J].
Bohannon, RW ;
Peolsson, A ;
Massy-Westropp, N ;
Desrosiers, J ;
Bear-Lehman, JB .
PHYSIOTHERAPY, 2006, 92 (01) :11-15
[9]   Grip Strength across the Life Course: Normative Data from Twelve British Studies [J].
Dodds, Richard M. ;
Syddall, Holly E. ;
Cooper, Rachel ;
Benzeval, Michaela ;
Deary, Ian J. ;
Dennison, Elaine M. ;
Der, Geoff ;
Gale, Catharine R. ;
Inskip, Hazel M. ;
Jagger, Carol ;
Kirkwood, Thomas B. ;
Lawlor, Debbie A. ;
Robinson, Sian M. ;
Starr, John M. ;
Steptoe, Andrew ;
Tilling, Kate ;
Kuh, Diana ;
Cooper, Cyrus ;
Sayer, Avan Aihie .
PLOS ONE, 2014, 9 (12)
[10]   Investigation of the relationship between anthropometric measurements and maximal handgrip strength in young adults [J].
Eidson, Christopher A. ;
Jenkins, Gavin R. ;
Yuen, Hon K. ;
Abernathy, Anne M. ;
Brannon, Mary Beth ;
Pung, Anna R. ;
Ward, Kiara D. ;
Weaver, Tara E. .
WORK-A JOURNAL OF PREVENTION ASSESSMENT & REHABILITATION, 2017, 57 (01) :3-8