The comparison of pregnancy outcomes in fresh and frozen embryo transfer: A cross-sectional study

被引:7
作者
Bagheri, Ramesh Baradaran [1 ,2 ,9 ]
Bazrafkan, Mahshid [2 ]
Sabour, Abbas [3 ]
Ataei, Mina [2 ,4 ]
Badehnoosh, Bita [5 ]
Mashak, Banafsheh [6 ]
Khakifirooz, Bahareh [7 ]
Moghaddam, Ramin [8 ]
机构
[1] Alborz Univ Med Sci, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Karaj, Iran
[2] ACECR, Avicenna Res Inst, Reprod Biotechnol Res Ctr, Tehran, Iran
[3] Alborz Univ Med Sci, Karaj, Iran
[4] Alborz Univ Med Sci, Social Determinants Hlth Res Ctr, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Karaj, Iran
[5] Alborz Univ Med Sci, Dietary Supplements & Probiot Res Ctr, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Karaj, Iran
[6] Alborz Univ Med Sci, Sch Med, Karaj, Iran
[7] Alborz Univ Med Sci, Kamali Hosp, Sch Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Karaj, Iran
[8] Int Acad Hlth Sci Informat IAHSI, Geneva, Switzerland
[9] Kamali Training Med Ctr, Kamali St,Shohada Sq,Shahid Beheshti Ave, Karaj 3155736179, Iran
关键词
Assisted reproductive techniques; In vitro fertilization; Embryo transfer; Cryopreservation; Outcome assessment; IN-VITRO FERTILIZATION;
D O I
10.18502/ijrm.v21i7.13891
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Background: The benefits of frozen embryo transfer (FET) vs. fresh embryo transfer for in vitro fertilization (IVF) have been discussed in previous studies. Objective: To determine and compare the pregnancy outcomes following FET and frozen embryo transfer in women who underwent assisted reproductive techniques.Materials and Methods: In this cross-sectional study, 233 women candidates for IVF/intra cytoplasmic sperm injection who referred to the Kamali Training Medical Center, Karaj, Iran during 2019-2020 were evaluated in 2 groups of fresh (n = 127) and frozen (n = 106) embryo transfers. The rates of pregnancy outcomes including chemical and clinical pregnancy, live birth, preeclampsia, ectopic pregnancy, still birth, and pregnancy loss were compared between groups in 3 age subgroups (< 25, 25-35, and 35-40 yr old).Results: No significant difference in terms of chemical and clinical pregnancy and live birth rates were observed between groups in women aged < 25 yr. Chemical and clinical pregnancy and live birth rates were significantly higher in the FET group compared to fresh group in 25-35-yr-old women (p = 0.01, p = 0.03, and p = 0.01, respectively). In 35-40-yr-old women, no significant differences were observed in terms of chemical and clinical pregnancy rates, but live birth rate was found to be significantly higher in the FET group (p = 0.02). The pregnancy loss was lower in the FET group (p = 0.038).Conclusion: In conclusion, the FET method in women aged 25-35 yr significantly increases the chance of successful IVF/intra cytoplasmic sperm injection.
引用
收藏
页码:551 / 556
页数:6
相关论文
共 13 条
[1]  
Aflatoonian A, 2016, INT J REPROD BIOMED, V14, P167
[2]   Can fresh embryo transfers be replaced by cryopreserved-thawed embryo transfers in assisted reproductive cycles? A randomized controlled trial (Retraction of vol 27, pg 357, 2010) [J].
Aflatoonian, Abbas ;
Oskouian, Homa ;
Ahmadi, Shahnaz ;
Oskouian, Leila .
JOURNAL OF ASSISTED REPRODUCTION AND GENETICS, 2013, 30 (09) :1245-1245
[3]   E-Freeze - a randomised controlled trial evaluating the clinical and cost effectiveness of a policy of freezing embryos followed by thawed frozen embryo transfer compared with a policy of fresh embryo transfer, in women undergoing in vitro fertilisation: a statistical analysis plan [J].
Bell, Jennifer L. ;
Hardy, Pollyanna ;
Greenland, Melanie ;
Juszczak, Edmund ;
Cole, Christina ;
Maheshwari, Abha ;
Bhattacharya, Siladitya ;
Linsell, Louise .
TRIALS, 2020, 21 (01)
[4]   Cost-effectiveness of freeze-all policy - A retrospective study based upon the outcome of cumulative live births [J].
Chang, Jui-Chun ;
Yi, Yu-Chiao ;
Shen, Pao-sheng ;
Guu, Hwa-Fen ;
Chen, Ya-Fang ;
Kung, Hsiao-Fan ;
Chen, Li-Yu ;
Chen, Ming-Jer .
TAIWANESE JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2021, 60 (01) :125-131
[5]   Maternal and child-health outcomes in pregnancies following Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART): a prospective cohort study [J].
da Silva, Shana Ginar ;
da Silveira, Mariangela Freitas ;
Bertoldi, Andrea Damaso ;
Domingues, Marlos Rodrigues ;
dos Santos, Ina da Silva .
BMC PREGNANCY AND CHILDBIRTH, 2020, 20 (01)
[6]   Is frozen embryo transfer better for mothers and babies? Can cumulative meta-analysis provide a definitive answer? [J].
Maheshwari, Abha ;
Pandey, Shilpi ;
Raja, Edwin Amalraj ;
Shetty, Ashalatha ;
Hamilton, Mark ;
Bhattacharya, Siladitya .
HUMAN REPRODUCTION UPDATE, 2018, 24 (01) :35-58
[7]   Fresh embryo transfer versus frozen embryo transfer in in vitro fertilization cycles: a systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Roque, Matheus ;
Lattes, Karinna ;
Serra, Sandra ;
Sola, Ivan ;
Geber, Selmo ;
Carreras, Ramon ;
Angel Checa, Miguel .
FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2013, 99 (01) :156-162
[8]   Frozen Embryo Transfer and Preeclampsia Risk [J].
Severino, Ana Isabel ;
Povoa, Ana Margarida .
JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY OBSTETRICS AND HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2021, 50 (09)
[9]   Pregnancy-related complications and perinatal outcomes resulting from transfer of cryopreserved versus fresh embryos in vitro fertilization: a meta-analysis [J].
Sha, Tingting ;
Yin, Xunqiang ;
Cheng, Wenwei ;
Massey, Isaac Yaw .
FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2018, 109 (02) :330-+
[10]   Transfer of Fresh versus Frozen Embryos in Ovulatory Women [J].
Shi, Yuhua ;
Sun, Yun ;
Hao, Cuifang ;
Zhang, Heping ;
Wei, Daimin ;
Zhang, Yunshan ;
Zhu, Yimin ;
Deng, Xiaohui ;
Qi, Xiujuan ;
Li, Hong ;
Ma, Xiang ;
Ren, Haiqin ;
Wang, Yaqin ;
Zhang, Dan ;
Wang, Bo ;
Liu, Fenghua ;
Wu, Qiongfang ;
Wang, Ze ;
Bai, Haiyan ;
Li, Yuan ;
Zhou, Yi ;
Sun, Mei ;
Liu, Hong ;
Li, Jing ;
Zhang, Lin ;
Chen, Xiaoli ;
Zhang, Songying ;
Sun, Xiaoxi ;
Legro, Richard S. ;
Chen, Zi-Jiang .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2018, 378 (02) :126-136