Use of proton pump inhibitors during pregnancy: A systematic review and meta-analysis of congenital malformations

被引:3
作者
Peron, Audrey [1 ,5 ]
Ripoche, Emmanuelle [2 ]
Picot, Cyndie [1 ]
Ajiji, Priscilla [2 ,3 ]
Cucherat, Michel [1 ,4 ]
Cottin, Judith [1 ]
机构
[1] Serv Hosp Univ Pharmaco Toxicol, Hosp Civils Lyon, Lyon, France
[2] Agence Natl Secur Medicament & Prod St ANSM, Adverse Events & Incidents Dept, Surveillance Div, St Denis, France
[3] Univ Paris Est Creteil, Fac St, EA 7379, Creteil, France
[4] Univ Lyon 1, Dept Biostat & Modelisat St & Environm, Equipe Evaluat & Modelisat Effets Medicaments, CNRS,Lab Biometrie & Biol Evolut,UMR5558, Lyon, France
[5] Serv Hosp Univ Pharmacotoxicol, Hosp Civils Lyon, Bat A162,162 Ave Lacassagne, F-69424 Lyon 03, France
关键词
Proton pump inhibitors; Systematic review; Meta-analysis; Pregnancy; Congenital malformations; ROBINS-I; SAFETY; RISK; OMEPRAZOLE; BIAS; HYPOSPADIAS; MEDICATION; WOMEN; DRUG;
D O I
10.1016/j.reprotox.2023.108419
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Use of proton pump inhibitors (PPI) are common among pregnant women to relieve gastrointestinal symptoms. The number of exposed pregnancies is therefore considerable, and a recent meta-analysis (MA) from 2020 raised concern about their teratogenicity. The aim of the study was to provide a MA of the risk of major congenital malformations (MCM) after PPI exposure during the first trimester of pregnancy. A systematic review and random-effects model approach were performed using a collaborative WEB-based meta-analysis platform (metaPreg.org) with a registered protocol (osf.io/u4gva). The primary outcome was the incidence of overall MCM. The secondary outcomes of interest were specific MCM reported by at least three studies. All comparative studies assessing these outcomes in PPI exposed pregnancies were searched from inception to April 2022. From the 211 initially identified studies, 11 were included in the MA. The pooled odds ratio (OR) for the primary outcome showed no significant results based on 5 618 exposed pregnancies (OR 1.10, 95% CI [0.95;1.26]; I2=0%). Similarly, no result was significant for the secondary outcomes. The total exposed sample size ranged from 3 161-5 085; OR ranged between 0.60 and 1.92; heterogeneity was between 0% and 23%. Based on the results of the present MA, first trimester PPI exposure was not associated with a significantly increased risk of overall or specific MCM. However, this MA included only observational studies which are prone to bias and there were insufficient data to evaluate PPI at a substance level. Future studies are needed to address this concern.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]   Letter: safety of proton pump inhibitors during pregnancy [J].
Acar, Selin ;
Keskin-Arslan, Elif ;
Uysal, Nusret ;
Karadas, Baris ;
Kaplan, Yusuf C. .
ALIMENTARY PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 2020, 52 (04) :739-739
[2]   Medications used to treat nausea and vomiting of pregnancy and the risk of selected birth defects [J].
Anderka, Marlene ;
Mitchell, Allen A. ;
Louik, Carol ;
Werler, Martha M. ;
Hernandez-Diaz, Sonia ;
Rasmussen, Sonja A. .
BIRTH DEFECTS RESEARCH PART A-CLINICAL AND MOLECULAR TERATOLOGY, 2012, 94 (01) :22-30
[3]   Summarizing systematic reviews: methodological development, conduct and reporting of an umbrella review approach [J].
Aromataris, Edoardo ;
Fernandez, Ritin ;
Godfrey, Christina M. ;
Holly, Cheryl ;
Khalil, Hanan ;
Tungpunkom, Patraporn .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EVIDENCE-BASED HEALTHCARE, 2015, 13 (03) :132-140
[4]  
Assurance maladie, AM LIOR QUAL SANT MA
[5]   PLACENTAL-TRANSFER OF OMEPRAZOLE IN MATERNAL AND FETAL SHEEP [J].
CHING, MS ;
MORGAN, DJ ;
MIHALY, GW ;
HARDY, KJ ;
SMALLWOOD, RA .
DEVELOPMENTAL PHARMACOLOGY AND THERAPEUTICS, 1986, 9 (05) :323-331
[6]  
Colvin L, 2011, PHARMACOEPIDEM DR S, V20, pS45
[7]   The safety of proton pump inhibitors in pregnancy: a multicentre prospective controlled study [J].
Diav-Citrin, O ;
Arnon, J ;
Shechtman, S ;
Schaefer, C ;
Tonningen, MR ;
Clementi, M ;
Santis, M ;
Robert-Gnansia, E ;
Valti, E ;
Malm, H ;
Ornoy, A .
ALIMENTARY PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 2005, 21 (03) :269-275
[8]   Trim and fill: A simple funnel-plot-based method of testing and adjusting for publication bias in meta-analysis [J].
Duval, S ;
Tweedie, R .
BIOMETRICS, 2000, 56 (02) :455-463
[9]   Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test [J].
Egger, M ;
Smith, GD ;
Schneider, M ;
Minder, C .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1997, 315 (7109) :629-634
[10]   Using random rather than fixed effects models in meta-analysis: Implications for situational specificity and validity generalization [J].
Erez, A ;
Bloom, MC ;
Wells, MT .
PERSONNEL PSYCHOLOGY, 1996, 49 (02) :275-306